Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-14-2010, 12:57 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Meph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: ontario
Posts: 84

240Z - '73 Datsun 240Z 240Z
90 day: 34.41 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 8 Times in 4 Posts
Reducing Tire Width

What could one expect to gain reducing two tires on a car from 285/40 to 225/50, the larger tire being a soft 180 tread wear compound and the new tire being a 400+ LLR.

The car seems to do 35MPG on a good day so lets use that as a starting point. The newer tire would be 1-2% smaller that the original so hopefully the gain would outweigh the loss in diameter.


For kicks what would be your guess at a final MPG if I did the following

- New tires
- Alignment (currently pull a bit to the right and totally ate the inside tread of the front right tire in a couple thousand km's, Toe is off, and at least 3/16ths toe in
- Switching from dino to synthetic oil in the trans and diff, lightest weight possible.

Wanna see if I can hit 40mpg one day

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-14-2010, 01:23 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
Meph,

not sure where to begin......
How about you giver us enough info to make a decission????



For starters, how about the last number on the tire size???
it's kinda important.......

The car came stock with 205/60/14. they wiegh 19lbs and have a diameter of 23.8 inches.

THere is no 285 in a 14, 15, or 16 (at tirerack.com so I can only assume they are 17 inch??????
I 285/40/17 wieghs 30lbs. that is just the tire!!!!! so you have 11lbs X 4 spinning on each corner 44extra lbs.
the diameter is 26inches.
Again, I assume you are staying with 17 inch rims to runn the 225/50/17. they wiegh 31lbs.....1lb more or 48 extra lbs from stock spinning. They are 25.9ijnches in diameter.....why bother????? the only upside is the high sidewall "COULD" give a little softer ride.

Bottom line .....you will not get better mileage.
225/50/17 wieghs more and the profile is 9.5inches down from 11inches.

more info needed....


good luck
__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 01:40 AM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Meph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: ontario
Posts: 84

240Z - '73 Datsun 240Z 240Z
90 day: 34.41 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 8 Times in 4 Posts
sorry its been a long day, new baby in the extended family (not mine). They are 15's and you'll never find them for sale, long outdated.

The 285/40/15 is on there now, balding like a middle aged man. My only option is to stretch a 225/50/15. We already discussed the stretching issue in another thread so if we put that to the side and focus on the reduction in tread width, weight and switching to a much stiffer compound. what gains could be expected?

sorry for the confusion
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 02:04 AM   #4 (permalink)
oldschool
 
Olympiadis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 184

White2003Focus - '03 Ford Focus SE 4-door sedan
Team Ford
90 day: 38.53 mpg (US)

White2001S10pickup - '01 Chevy S10 extended cab LR
Last 3: 24.51 mpg (US)

1989DodgeOMNI - '89 Dodge Omni
Last 3: 30.38 mpg (US)

1991ChevyC1500pickup - '91 Chevy C1500
Last 3: 24.03 mpg (US)

White1986Irocz - '86 Chevy Irocz LB9
Last 3: 30.14 mpg (US)

1999 C5 Corvette - '99 Chevy Corvette

2008 Infinity G37 - '08 Infinity G37
Thanks: 21
Thanked 35 Times in 25 Posts
You know those things can't be predicted with much accuracy. It always depends. The first thing that comes to mind for me is your driving style.
If you are hypermiling and already doing a lot of coasting, then your tire upgrade and improved alignment are going to help proportionally more.

The individual gains are going to depend on how bad your situation is presently, - how much your current specs are hurting you while using your current driving style.

I think I've seen several people post individual gains between 3% and 6% by just increasing tire pressure from 32 PSI to 45 - 50 PSI. I'm sure that was for all four tires.

The LRR tires have claimed as much as 7% if I am remembering correctly.

I would just expect the worst and hope for the best.

The toe alignment can actually make a very large difference on some vehicles. Of course you'll have to check for play at all of your mounting points. Odd wear on just one tire usually means slop on one side. I know little to nothing about your particular car model.
__________________
#####################################
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 04:58 AM   #5 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 796
Thanks: 4
Thanked 393 Times in 240 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meph View Post
What could one expect to gain reducing two tires on a car from 285/40 to 225/50, the larger tire being a soft 180 tread wear compound and the new tire being a 400+ LLR.........
First, no one is going to be able to answer your question with any degree of accuracy. To understand why, you need to read this:

Barry's Tire Tech

and this:

Barry's Tire Tech


So your proposed going from a 285/40R15 to a 225/50R15 is going the wrong direction for load carrying capacity. You are going smaller in load carrying capacity and that's the wrong direction for RR. Try a 255/50R15 or something like that.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 10:20 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Patrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Northern Florida, USA
Posts: 510

Hot Tamale - '10 Toyota Prius III
Thanks: 27
Thanked 96 Times in 70 Posts
Here's my SWAG (Scientific Wild Ass Guess) at it: +5 mpg.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2010, 02:09 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapriRacer View Post
So your proposed going from a 285/40R15 to a 225/50R15 is going the wrong direction for load carrying capacity. You are going smaller in load carrying capacity and that's the wrong direction for RR. Try a 255/50R15 or something like that.
Or pick the higher load index versions (XL) of a given tyre size.

That'd help too, wouldn't it ?
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2010, 07:02 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Meph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: ontario
Posts: 84

240Z - '73 Datsun 240Z 240Z
90 day: 34.41 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 8 Times in 4 Posts
So does this all mean there are no gains to be had going from a wider to narrow tire? All this points to everything being a big catch 22.

At the very least I know my current performance tires are not anywhere close to a LLR tire, and the potential gains of switching to a LLR are probably at their greatest.

Would we not all be rolling around on the widest tires available if they key to minimizing resistance was a wider tire?

Im very much in limbo as to what I should do.

Also did my alignment today, my measurements showed almost 1" of toe out. Im not surprised after all the new parts on it. I used some DIY skills on it and now im about 1/32" toe in. Drives about the same but I notice when its int he garage, it wants to roll a lot easier. I use to push it out if I didn't want to start it, now i just give it a nudge and it rolls out all by itself. The results from my 15 miles test drive showed about a 1mpg increase from before, but my speeds were a lot higher at times 60-70km/h before and up to 90 or so today with a couple boost incidents as well.

I think the lower temps here are starting to have a noticeable effect, Ive dropped a few mpg from when it was 80 outside, its about 55 now so maybe that accounts for lower numbers.
__________________

Last edited by Meph; 09-15-2010 at 07:21 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2010, 07:16 PM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 28

Saber Rolla - '98 Toyota Corolla VE

White Yaris - '13 Toyota Yaris L
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
ah, The classic Z...

skinny tires reduce the tire friction with the road, but I guess you'd need to change all 4 to make it worthwhile, including the aerodynamic improvements.

I'd suppose the difference would be minimal regardless and not worth the loss of traction to keep you safe

and what Capri said...
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2010, 05:57 AM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meph View Post
So does this all mean there are no gains to be had going from a wider to narrow tire?
Aside from the rolling resistance, there's also the aerodynamic drag to consider.
60mm (almost 2.5") narrower on every tyre is a lot.

Quote:
Would we not all be rolling around on the widest tires available if they key to minimizing resistance was a wider tire?
All eco-cars built as such, are rolling on narrow tyres - usually the skinniest tyres found on a given model.

Quote:
I think the lower temps here are starting to have a noticeable effect
Yeah.
Time to move to the southern hemisphere

__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CdA list Daox Aerodynamics 206 10-25-2023 07:32 PM
tire width vs. drag (Cd) MetroMPG Aerodynamics 62 01-05-2022 09:41 AM
Top 5 most fuel efficient tires (Lowest Rolling resistance: LRR) blackjackel General Efficiency Discussion 144 01-26-2016 12:39 AM
Discussion on tire efficiency Ernie Rogers General Efficiency Discussion 69 12-27-2014 02:17 PM
Tire size vs. hub width and weight limits Piwoslaw EcoModding Central 3 06-25-2009 07:50 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com