Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-18-2011, 05:26 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 116
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Roof Rack Decision (looking at mounting Nissan Frontier racks on Sentra)

How heavy of a hit do roof racks make on a vehicle if they have an air dam to divert the air over the bars? Is there any impact if the only thing on the vehicle is the side rails, until the rest is needed?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-19-2011, 09:43 AM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 116
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Let me ask a more pointed question. I am wanting to install the roof rack from my totaled Frontier onto my Sentra. Yes it will take some resizing, anyway, back on point. I am debating on installing it and running some tests to see if I can keep my gas mileage the same (38.5~) and still have the rack. I am debating on moving the cross bars all the way forward so the air diverts over them and down the back of the car. I do have a need for a roof rack, more than less. What are your thoughts?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2011, 01:42 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
3-Wheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Southern WI
Posts: 827

AlienMobile - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 80.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 101
Thanked 560 Times in 191 Posts
A picture of the roof rack would help....

Round tubes create a large wake, almost a large as a flat plate of the same dimension.

If you could shape winglets around each tube, well maybe that could minimize the effect of the rack up there.

There is a lot of high velocity air in that location, so making the tubes into airfoils would be something I would think about.

Jim.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2011, 02:22 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
Just having the side rails will hurt your FE. It may not be enough to notice, but I have a gut feeling that it will. Having the cross-bars on will hurt even more. Having the air dam on will probably mitigate that impact to some extent, but likely the MPG will be worse than without any roof rack at all.

The only way to quantify things, though, is to try with and without.

-soD
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2011, 08:54 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 116
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
The fuel economy is the big deciding factor in this. I have a temporary rack I put on from time to time, but it would be nice to have it readily available. The tubes are very broad, so I probably won't, that and it will take major modifications to get it to fit. Anywho, I will see if I can find a difference of fuel economy for the trucks, and see how big it is. The pick is of the same type rack, not my rack.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	E198D0A7-1230-4F0D-B402-DE91ED8E3EDA_1.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	41.6 KB
ID:	9914  
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2011, 10:01 AM   #6 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,960 Times in 3,604 Posts
Back to the question:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sentraguy View Post
to see if I can keep my gas mileage the same (38.5~) and still have the rack.
Short answer: not possible.

A roof rack adds to frontal area and increases the vehicle's drag coefficient. Even side rails alone will do this. So your fuel economy will decrease, and the question is: how much?

Answer is: it depends on the vehicle & the rack design.

FYI, I've "tested" (not vigorously; judge the data for yourself) racks on two vehicles:

Edit: Note the speeds of the tests; the faster you drive, the larger the % change will be.

1998 Pontiac Firefly (Geo Metro - 1.0L 3cyl - 5 spd manual)



@ 88 km/h (54.7 mph)
  • 55.2 mpg (US) = no roof racks
  • 48.2 mpg (US)(-7.0 mpg / -12.7%) empty roof racks (fixed rectangular cross bars)
  • 40.1 mpg (US) (-15.1 mpg / -27.3%) roof racks with mountain bike
Details: Mini-experiment: the wrath of roof racks - MetroMPG.com

2005 Pontiac Montana (3.x L V6 automatic)



@ 88.5 km/h (55 mph)

33.7 mpg (US) - racks off (including side rails off)
32.8 mpg (US) - racks on (-0.9 mpg)

Details in this thread: http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...-6-a-6069.html

---

I think these may represent extreme examples. If I had to guess, I bet your results would fall somewhere between the two.

So instead of modifying the racks to permanently attach them to the car, I would recommend designing some kind of mounting plate/hardware that you can get the racks on & off fairly easily.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
aerohead (12-22-2011)
Old 12-22-2011, 10:06 AM   #7 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,960 Times in 3,604 Posts
Quote:
I will see if I can find a difference of fuel economy for the trucks, and see how big it is.
As you can see from the above examples, it's not as simple as comparing the truck with/without to your car. The impact of the same/similar racks on very different vehicles will be different.

It's too bad there's no easy answer!
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
aerohead (12-22-2011)
Old 12-22-2011, 05:01 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,892
Thanks: 23,969
Thanked 7,221 Times in 4,648 Posts
rack

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sentraguy View Post
How heavy of a hit do roof racks make on a vehicle if they have an air dam to divert the air over the bars? Is there any impact if the only thing on the vehicle is the side rails, until the rest is needed?
If you had a ScanGauge you might alter the rack as your were thinking about,then attach it temporarily,test it,then decide.
I'm not sure how to think about the air dam itself.It would mean quite a frontal area increase.And that would be permanent.
I've seen many racks in which the crossbars were the lowest drag item on the vehicle.They're operating in the fastest air around the body due to the way the windshield divides the airstream,so their local drag is deceptively high,but might be lower than with the airdam.Maybe you can get 'results' without setting anything into cement.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com