Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-01-2012, 09:47 PM   #61 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
What's the latest with this project ?
I'm still impressed with the simplicity of the front skirt idea.

Since the skirts are shower liner material, I was wondering about if they flap in the breeze as you drive sine the material is so flexible.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-02-2012, 09:17 AM   #62 (permalink)
Master Ecomadman
 
arcosine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,154

sc1 - '98 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.17 mpg (US)

Airplane Bike - '11 home built Carp line Tour

rans - '97 rans tailwind

tractor - '66 International Cub cadet 129

2002 Space Odyssey - '02 Honda Odyssey EX-L
90 day: 28.25 mpg (US)

red bug - '00 VW beetle TDI

big tractor - '66 ford 3400

red vw - '00 VW new beetle TDI
90 day: 58.42 mpg (US)

RV - '88 Winnebago LeSharo
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 337 Times in 227 Posts
The bungee cords keep it from flapping, but if one gets loose, then watch out! I drove through a harvested corn field last fall and the corn stumps ripped off the bungee cords and when I got on the highway they flew off. I put a half skirt back on one side so far.
__________________
- Tony

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2012, 09:31 AM   #63 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Such a simple solution to what is usually a complex area.
The thing I like most about your skirts are that they don't add any frontal area.
I'd like to copy your idea someday.

What other mods have you done to the car lately ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2012, 09:50 AM   #64 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,179
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cd View Post
Yes, the Impact looked so much better that the EV-1 after it. It's like GM tried to de-style and uglify the car for some reason.
Little subtle style elements like the shape of the front turn signal lights, as well as the rear styling of the car never made it with the EV-1. The character line on the back end of the car above the tail lights really made the back of the Impact more attractive than the EV-1, and the way that the tail lights met up with the body line made the car appear less bulbous. Even the body colored roof looked better than the blacked out version on the EV-1 which seemed to emphasize the jelly bean look.
The bumper opening even looks good on the Impact versus the EV-1 bumper which ended up looking like a pair of swollen lips.
Personally, i love the look of the Impact.

Congrats on the CRX. I certainly jealous !
I had no idea that there were so many differences.

Thanks for posting.


Quote:
Originally Posted by arcosine View Post
The difference between style and aerodynamics is aerodynamics never go out of style, cool a pop out boat tail...

Tony
Well said Tony.

Quote:
Originally Posted by arcosine View Post
I drove through a harvested corn field last fall and the corn stumps ripped off the bungee cords ...........
Why?

I liked the way the covers opened up at full turn (with black material). Reminded me of the wheel well venting you see on race cars.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............

Last edited by kach22i; 03-02-2012 at 10:01 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2012, 08:26 PM   #65 (permalink)
Master Ecomadman
 
arcosine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,154

sc1 - '98 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.17 mpg (US)

Airplane Bike - '11 home built Carp line Tour

rans - '97 rans tailwind

tractor - '66 International Cub cadet 129

2002 Space Odyssey - '02 Honda Odyssey EX-L
90 day: 28.25 mpg (US)

red bug - '00 VW beetle TDI

big tractor - '66 ford 3400

red vw - '00 VW new beetle TDI
90 day: 58.42 mpg (US)

RV - '88 Winnebago LeSharo
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 337 Times in 227 Posts
I haven't made any mods lately, I want to out the front skirts back on, but use a tougher material, the PVC shower liner rips easily, HDPE sheet would be good. I drive the car only once a week and cycle to work and back.
__________________
- Tony

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2012, 01:19 AM   #66 (permalink)
herp derp Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,049

Saturn-sold - '99 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 28.28 mpg (US)

Yukon - '03 GMC Yukon Denali
90 day: 13.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 331 Times in 233 Posts
Arcosine -
Did you do any testing before removing your rear spoiler? Or know if there are any interactions between the belly pan and the spoiler?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2012, 10:41 AM   #67 (permalink)
Master Ecomadman
 
arcosine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,154

sc1 - '98 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.17 mpg (US)

Airplane Bike - '11 home built Carp line Tour

rans - '97 rans tailwind

tractor - '66 International Cub cadet 129

2002 Space Odyssey - '02 Honda Odyssey EX-L
90 day: 28.25 mpg (US)

red bug - '00 VW beetle TDI

big tractor - '66 ford 3400

red vw - '00 VW new beetle TDI
90 day: 58.42 mpg (US)

RV - '88 Winnebago LeSharo
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 337 Times in 227 Posts
NO, I consider the spoiler completely architectural. Spoiler is on top belly pan on bottom, hope they would never meet! I did consider mounting the spoiler lower, in back of the trunk lid.
__________________
- Tony

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2012, 11:06 AM   #68 (permalink)
Master Ecomadman
 
arcosine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,154

sc1 - '98 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.17 mpg (US)

Airplane Bike - '11 home built Carp line Tour

rans - '97 rans tailwind

tractor - '66 International Cub cadet 129

2002 Space Odyssey - '02 Honda Odyssey EX-L
90 day: 28.25 mpg (US)

red bug - '00 VW beetle TDI

big tractor - '66 ford 3400

red vw - '00 VW new beetle TDI
90 day: 58.42 mpg (US)

RV - '88 Winnebago LeSharo
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 337 Times in 227 Posts
I just orders some HDPE sheet for the new front skirts, I'll report the installation.
__________________
- Tony

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2012, 06:39 PM   #69 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
arcosine -

Quote:
Originally Posted by arcosine View Post
NO, I consider the spoiler completely architectural. Spoiler is on top belly pan on bottom, hope they would never meet! I did consider mounting the spoiler lower, in back of the trunk lid.
The only(?) difference between the SC1 and the SC2 is the spoiler, so that might be related to the Cd difference :



CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2012, 01:11 AM   #70 (permalink)
herp derp Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,049

Saturn-sold - '99 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 28.28 mpg (US)

Yukon - '03 GMC Yukon Denali
90 day: 13.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 331 Times in 233 Posts
cfg83-
i'm having my doubts if that chart is correct, a few years ago i remember seeing another sc car (dont recall whose) getting some impressive numbers. they hadn't done testing either, just thought it'd be better w/o the spoiler. i'd seen that chart then and so just didnt worry about it. now heres another (arcosine) sc1 putting up good numbers w/o a spoiler.

so i did some testing... well, my results are dirty / sloppy at best due to traffic. measuring with a sg2, at 70mph i averaged 2.86% better mileage w/o the spoiler. looking for a way to skew the results for the spoiler, if i look at only my southbound runs i still averaged 1.08% better mileage w/o the spoiler.

because of traffic, i need to retest under better circumstances, but at this point i would be surprised if it came out any worse than a wash for removing the spoiler.

i had thought that the portions of the spoiler extending over the fenders must cause drag, but figured that the spoiler would be a benefit, basically extending the trunk lid. now i'm thinking the best case scenario is going to either be no spoiler, or a narrower spoiler.

sorry to invade the thread, but it is 'sc1 aero' still

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
saturn





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com