View Poll Results: Should Tahoe Hybrids be allowed to park in "Hybrid" parking stalls?
|
NO
|
|
7 |
17.07% |
YES
|
|
34 |
82.93% |
06-21-2014, 05:51 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,668
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,187 Times in 813 Posts
|
That is the beauty of this forum, ecomoding works on everything!
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
06-21-2014, 08:49 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,827
Thanks: 4,328
Thanked 4,481 Times in 3,446 Posts
|
The special parking spots shouldn't exist in the first place. What does a hybrid have to do with the occupants ability to walk further distances to the entrance?
That said, it is not illegal to park in hybrid, senior, veteran, or take-out parking spots. However, since it is private property, the owners may have the vehicles towed for failure to comply with their rules for parking.
That reminds me, I took advantage of many senior perks when I was a senior in high school. Most businesses were willing to give me the senior discount after I explained how I was a senior.
Last edited by redpoint5; 06-21-2014 at 11:43 PM..
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-21-2014, 09:11 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Auburn/Felton CA
Posts: 90
Thanks: 45
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
Only if the majority of it's seats are filled.
|
|
|
06-21-2014, 10:42 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Hydrogen > EV
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NW Ohio, United States
Posts: 2,025
Thanks: 994
Thanked 402 Times in 285 Posts
|
It's a hybrid. Is a rabbit that helps someone process PTSD less of a service animal than a seeing eye dog?
|
|
|
06-21-2014, 11:41 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Urbana, IL
Posts: 1,939
Thanks: 199
Thanked 1,807 Times in 943 Posts
|
Look at it this way:
Over the course of 100,000 miles, a Tahoe hybrid at 21mpg (combined) will save 1121 gallons of gasoline versus a conventional Tahoe at 17mpg. A Civic hybrid at 44mpg saves 853 gallons versus a conventional 32mpg Civic. If a person is going to drive a big SUV anyway, there is a greater impact overall if it's a hybrid than if the person driving a small car switches to a small hybrid.
In a perfect world, only people utilizing the extra capacity of a large vehicle all the time would drive one. In a reality where this does not happen, anything that mitigates the impact of these vehicles should be encouraged.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Vman455 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-21-2014, 11:44 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,827
Thanks: 4,328
Thanked 4,481 Times in 3,446 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vman455
...anything that mitigates the impact of these vehicles should be encouraged.
|
Anything?
Isn't saving enormous sums of money on fuel incentive enough?
|
|
|
06-21-2014, 11:50 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,572 Times in 2,836 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kYLEMtnCRUZr
Only if the majority of it's seats are filled.
|
Motor cycles?
As long as they dont have a side car.
Or how about a half ton suburban towing a loaded18 foot trailer with a GVW of 16,000lb?
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
Last edited by oil pan 4; 06-21-2014 at 11:57 PM..
|
|
|
06-22-2014, 12:01 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,697 Times in 1,515 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mechman600
Should they be allowed because they are at least trying a bit, or is the whole idea of a Tahoe hybrid purely ridiculous to begin with?
|
I disagree with the way the Tahoe hybrid was conceived, it sounds kinda odd that the "greenest" version had the biggest engine, but if it's hybrid it still qualifies to the parking spots as much as a stereotypical small hybrid.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to cRiPpLe_rOoStEr For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-22-2014, 12:26 AM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Greater Milwaukee area, Wisconsin
Posts: 157
Thanks: 46
Thanked 30 Times in 23 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecomodded
A spade is a spade so it gets to park in the spot , embarrassingly , with its shameless 20/23 mpg city/highway mileage.
|
Let's look at this from a different perspective. My Taurus is rated 18/25 according to fueleconomy.gov. We're talking about a smaller, lighter, more aerodynamic 5 passenger sedan. With the amount of city driving I'm doing as of late, I'd probably save a bunch of gas with a Tahoe hybrid. Heck, despite the EPA rating I'm willing to bet I could pull similar or even better numbers out of that Tahoe on the highway than I can with the Taurus.
We could even go more modern and do this. A 2013 V6 Camry (2013 is when the Tahoe hybrid was discontinued) is rated 21 mpg in the city. We're talking about a 1mpg difference between a lightweight, aerodynamic 5-passenger sedan and a 7-passenger brick.
Granted, moving up to a more comparable model year adjusts the highway mileage to put the sedan far ahead at 31. But the sedan doesn't seat seven, and we're still comparing apples to watermelons.
My point is, the Chevy does pretty damn well for what it is. Sure, they went nuts with the Hybrid stickers. But it does what it's supposed to; it massively improves fuel economy. Is improving the fuel economy of a thirsty, popular SUV less important than improving the fuel economy of a Corolla? GM could, and has, put a bunch of effort into smaller hybrid/gas vehicles. But rather than only do that (looking at you Japanese automakers), they've put effort into practically every vehicle across the board, including trucks and SUVs.
Hell, they should be praised for this.
There are far better vehicles to spend time hating. Toyota, for instance, that automaker so often heralded as a champion of fuel economy, makes this pig:
2014 Toyota Sequoia 2WD, 5.7L 8 Cylinder: 13/17
|
|
|
06-22-2014, 12:48 AM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
Hydrogen > EV
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NW Ohio, United States
Posts: 2,025
Thanks: 994
Thanked 402 Times in 285 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Other Andy
... But rather than only do that (looking at you Japanese automakers), they've put effort into practically every vehicle across the board, including trucks and SUVs....
|
Compare Side-by-Side
Highlander- 27/28/28
Pathfinder- 25/28/26
RX 450h- 32/28/30
QX60- 26/28/26
Honda is the only one without a hybrid SUV.
Not tit for tat, since these are all 2014s vs the Tahoe, but Japan is still doing hybrid SUVs.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to UltArc For This Useful Post:
|
|
|