Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-30-2013, 09:05 AM   #41 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard View Post
The closest parallel to this vehicle that I can think of is the original VW L1 prototype - it had an 8.5HP single cylinder diesel and a teardrop shape. It was built using virtually every bit of unobtainium, though and it was *not* very quick; in fact I'm sure that it was quite slow.

I think that gearing is going to be your challenge, and weight. Your aero looks damn good, and it seems to be very robust, and carefully constructed.
LOL, Neil. you posted this reply while I was typing the one above. We're thinking alike. I saw the first write ups on the VW 1liter and wish they had built that version, but it would have cost a bundle with all the higher tech materials. My design is basically something a decent body shop could repair in the event of a collsion, without having to fly engineers from Germany to advise the shop of how they should repair the VW model.

Anything built from scratch is going to be expensive, unless like yourself, you spend a lot of time and effort on your own as you have done with your design.

I see this vehicle as a rolling billboard for my ideas and designs. It should certainly draw attention!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I need to get an ecomodder sticker .

regards
Mech

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-30-2013, 10:17 AM   #42 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mikeyjd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 838

Matchbox - '93 Ford Festiva L
Team Ford
Last 3: 70.16 mpg (US)

Salamander - '99 Chrysler Concorde LXI
Team Dodge
90 day: 30.3 mpg (US)

Urquhart - '97 Toyota Tacoma 4x4 V6 3.4L DLX
Pickups
90 day: 25.81 mpg (US)

Smudge - '98 Toyota Tacoma
90 day: 40.65 mpg (US)

Calebro - '15 Renault Trafic 1.25 dci
90 day: 39.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,380
Thanked 209 Times in 155 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic View Post
Pictures.

regards
Mech
I want one.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2013, 11:05 AM   #43 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194

White Whale - '07 Dodge Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 37.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
Sweet project! Subscribed.
__________________
Diesel Dave

My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".

1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg

BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html


  Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2013, 01:45 PM   #44 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 21

Eggy - '06 Citroën C3 1.4 HDi (DV4TD 8HZ) Exclusive
Diesel
90 day: 49.8 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Amazing, posting to get subscribed.
Thanks for share!
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2013, 02:22 PM   #45 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
Excellent work.

Watching like a hawk.

Reverse gear?
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2013, 03:04 PM   #46 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Old mech - Since it looks like the 'cage' of your design will be, ultimately, it's structure, could you save some weight using thin fiber-plastic [FRP] paneling for a body? Or even some non-structural fiberglass...

Might help cut down on road noise if you used PVC panels, since PVC is acoustically inert... and sort of temperature inert as well, which could also save on heating/cooling load.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Christ For This Useful Post:
HHOTDI (05-17-2014), user removed (08-30-2013)
Old 08-30-2013, 03:05 PM   #47 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Dave View Post
Excellent work.

Watching like a hawk.

Reverse gear?
Donut.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2013, 03:12 PM   #48 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,320
Thanks: 24,442
Thanked 7,387 Times in 4,784 Posts
Cd 0.15

I think it would be quite remarkable if you didn't realize 0.15.
She's a more proper half-body than the Cd 0.14 B'o'chum University solar car and has the effective fineness ratio more like Cambridge University's Eco Racer CUER,which Tokai University is reporting at Cd 0.11.
Hucho reproduced Buchheim et al's Volkswagen research of 1981 publication which represented a bevy of Cd 0.15-0.16 shapes measured in the climatic tunnel.If you throw in Buchheim's 'Flow-body' long-tail version reported in Hucho's 1978 SAE paper,they got Cd 0.14.
And Hucho says that with further integration of the wheels into the body,that Cds on the order of 0.09 to 0.07 can be approached (as with NUNA-3).
If I were a gambling man,I'd say 0.15 is in the bag.
If every member here at the Aero Forum put a few bucks in a magic hat,we could underwrite a trip to the the A-2 Tunnel for a measurement.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
Christ (08-30-2013), HHOTDI (09-10-2013), mikeyjd (08-31-2013), user removed (08-30-2013)
Old 08-30-2013, 04:06 PM   #49 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
Old mech - Since it looks like the 'cage' of your design will be, ultimately, it's structure, could you save some weight using thin fiber-plastic [FRP] paneling for a body? Or even some non-structural fiberglass...

Might help cut down on road noise if you used PVC panels, since PVC is acoustically inert... and sort of temperature inert as well, which could also save on heating/cooling load.
It will have sheet metal on the sides of the passengers compartment, welded to the frame for side collision protection. Every thing else will be aluminum. That's the choice of the owner of the machine shop and I tend to agree with him. Don't think there would be much room for weight savings unless you used something like mylar. He and I think alike, I told him that what HE has built is as close to my visualization as anything I have ever done in my life.

I just don't see a real benefit in taking them out of their race car building experience, since it is their comfort zone. I might paint the steel parts silver and just polish the aluminium. For insulation I plan on using panels and or spray type insulation, but it needs to be fire resistant.

As far as reverse, it could be anything from a motor that would engage the drive chain, to floor flaps and my feet. It certainly is a valid point but for now I can always just push it backwards inititally.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2013, 05:15 PM   #50 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 29.5 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 49.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
RE what Neil was saying about the original VW 1L - I remember reading the article where they described the prototype and how the chairman of VW drove it over 100km to a meeting. He didn't baby it, said it plugged right along at 110-120kph. That's about 75mph, not bad at all.

Of course he was probably getting buzzed big time by enormous BMWs tearing by on the German highways, but there's only so much you can accomplish when you're going to make this many sacrifices to economy.

__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com