08-29-2014, 02:15 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Miami FL
Posts: 121
Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
|
A small displacement engine with an Oxygen concentrator when power is needed?
What about a small displacement engine for economy during stop and go traffic jams.
During uphills, passing or otherwise called to make serious power it would have an electric supercharger passing air thru an Oxygen concentrator
Oxygen concentrator - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Oxygen concentrator feeds Oxygen enriched air to the engine allowing more fuel to be burned thus being capable of generating much more power for a given engine size. Even more power than a turbo engine of the same displacement.
It remains to be seen if such high Oxygen concentrations would make the engine any more prone to predetonation although I suspect air temperatures would be more important than Oxygen content.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
08-29-2014, 02:19 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
|
Interesting idea.
I think a turbocharger would be more efficient than a device using electricity. They effectively do the same thing, but the turbo uses primarily waste energy where as the concentrator does not.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Daox For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-29-2014, 02:47 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
herp derp Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,049
Thanks: 43
Thanked 331 Times in 233 Posts
|
i think you're going to need a bigger oxygen concentrator.... or compressor and storage tanks. Since about 1999, units capable of supplying up to 10 lpm have been available. Oxygen concentrator - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
10 lpm, would be about .35cfm
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to 2000mc For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-29-2014, 02:55 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 114
Thanks: 47
Thanked 96 Times in 34 Posts
|
I read an article today about the 2019 VW Golf 8. They want to use an 1.0 liter 3-cylinder engine with electric turbo. Because at low rpm, the small engine doesn't have enough exhaustgasses to power a conventional turbo. They also want to integrate a flywheel system, variable compression, full wheel covers and 'engine off coasting-technology' (which we all know). They are also thinking about a four-seater XL1, which will be called the XL2.
|
|
|
08-29-2014, 03:35 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Tinkerer
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 284
Thanks: 7
Thanked 63 Times in 54 Posts
|
Even if you could get enough volume the high oxygen concentration would make the fuel charge burn so much hotter that you may burn through a piston. Think oxy/acetolene torch. Even with NOS (which is used for its enriched oxygen content, NO4 I think) is still buffered somewhat by the Nitrogen. You may be able to stiffle the excess heat by enriching the charge with a bunch of added fuel, but I agree a turbo would be more efficient and it compresses air which is about 3/4 Nitrogen anyway. Smartcar turbos are tiny and used on mopeds for boost.
|
|
|
08-29-2014, 06:50 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
|
Most people with problems absorbing oxygen into their blood system uses these machines. Sounds like a compressor running 247, dad was on one.
I think for quick bursts of performance a wet NOS kit is a better choice. I ran the idea by a few mechanics about using a 25 shot or less on my insight and they said not for every day use.
|
|
|
08-30-2014, 02:35 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Lots of Questions
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Jose
Posts: 665
Thanks: 343
Thanked 101 Times in 79 Posts
|
You mean something like this:
Burning Pure Oxygen vs. Air
?
__________________
Don't forget to like our Facebook page!
Best EM Quotes:
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
It has been said, that if you peel the duct tape back on Earth's equator, you'll find that the two hemispheres are held together with J B Weld.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan9
subscribed with a soda.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
If you're burning,and someone throws gasoline on you,there will be a localized cooling effect, but you're still on fire.
|
|
|
|
08-30-2014, 02:17 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
I think a wet shot of nitrous would be better.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
08-30-2014, 03:54 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 180
Thanks: 209
Thanked 162 Times in 47 Posts
|
|
|
|
08-30-2014, 05:38 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
|
Im wondering if the "wet" or fuel added would negate any fuel economy using NOS over forced induction? Is the fuel used during the shot the same used for a turbo application? At least with the NOS you can use a switch to arm it, rpm range or a progressive setup where as the turbo is always on.
Ive toyed around with the idea of a chemical intercooler or methanol water injection or using that in place of the fuel when spraying NOS so you keep your MPG?
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
I think a wet shot of nitrous would be better.
|
|
|
|
|