Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Reply  Post New Thread
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-29-2014, 01:15 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Miami FL
Posts: 121
Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
A small displacement engine with an Oxygen concentrator when power is needed?

What about a small displacement engine for economy during stop and go traffic jams.

During uphills, passing or otherwise called to make serious power it would have an electric supercharger passing air thru an Oxygen concentrator
Oxygen concentrator - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Oxygen concentrator feeds Oxygen enriched air to the engine allowing more fuel to be burned thus being capable of generating much more power for a given engine size. Even more power than a turbo engine of the same displacement.

It remains to be seen if such high Oxygen concentrations would make the engine any more prone to predetonation although I suspect air temperatures would be more important than Oxygen content.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

Old 08-29-2014, 01:19 PM   #2 (permalink)
Daox's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,175

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,474
Thanked 2,537 Times in 1,529 Posts
Interesting idea.

I think a turbocharger would be more efficient than a device using electricity. They effectively do the same thing, but the turbo uses primarily waste energy where as the concentrator does not.
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Daox For This Useful Post:
Cobb (08-29-2014), pgfpro (08-30-2014)
Old 08-29-2014, 01:47 PM   #3 (permalink)
herp derp Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,049

Saturn-sold - '99 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 28.28 mpg (US)

Yukon - '03 GMC Yukon Denali
90 day: 13.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 331 Times in 233 Posts
i think you're going to need a bigger oxygen concentrator.... or compressor and storage tanks. Since about 1999, units capable of supplying up to 10 lpm have been available. Oxygen concentrator - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
10 lpm, would be about .35cfm
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 2000mc For This Useful Post:
Cobb (08-29-2014)
Old 08-29-2014, 01:55 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 114

Volvo 360 - '85 Volvo 360

Peugeot - '01 Peugeot 306
Thanks: 47
Thanked 96 Times in 34 Posts
I read an article today about the 2019 VW Golf 8. They want to use an 1.0 liter 3-cylinder engine with electric turbo. Because at low rpm, the small engine doesn't have enough exhaustgasses to power a conventional turbo. They also want to integrate a flywheel system, variable compression, full wheel covers and 'engine off coasting-technology' (which we all know). They are also thinking about a four-seater XL1, which will be called the XL2.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2014, 02:35 PM   #5 (permalink)
kafer65's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 282

Silver - '15 Mazda CX-5 Sport
Team Mazda
90 day: 37.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 60 Times in 52 Posts
Even if you could get enough volume the high oxygen concentration would make the fuel charge burn so much hotter that you may burn through a piston. Think oxy/acetolene torch. Even with NOS (which is used for its enriched oxygen content, NO4 I think) is still buffered somewhat by the Nitrogen. You may be able to stiffle the excess heat by enriching the charge with a bunch of added fuel, but I agree a turbo would be more efficient and it compresses air which is about 3/4 Nitrogen anyway. Smartcar turbos are tiny and used on mopeds for boost.

Mirror deletes, 80% grill blocks, wheel covers, 50 psi tires = 6% better MPG avg. over a year. Wheel skirts overcoming ethanol winter fuel mpg losses and more!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2014, 05:50 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 276 Times in 226 Posts

Most people with problems absorbing oxygen into their blood system uses these machines. Sounds like a compressor running 247, dad was on one.

I think for quick bursts of performance a wet NOS kit is a better choice. I ran the idea by a few mechanics about using a 25 shot or less on my insight and they said not for every day use.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2014, 01:35 AM   #7 (permalink)
Lots of Questions
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Jose
Posts: 642

Motor-Rolla - '01 Toyota Corolla LE
Team Toyota
90 day: 28.3 mpg (US)

Gaia - '99 Toyota 4Runner SR5 Highlander
90 day: 19.78 mpg (US)

Gaia - Round 2 - '99 Toyota 4runner SR5 Highlander
90 day: 17.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 333
Thanked 87 Times in 66 Posts
You mean something like this:

Burning Pure Oxygen vs. Air

Don't forget to like our Facebook page!

Best EM Quotes:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
It has been said, that if you peel the duct tape back on Earth's equator, you'll find that the two hemispheres are held together with J B Weld.
Originally Posted by Dan9 View Post
subscribed with a soda.
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
If you're burning,and someone throws gasoline on you,there will be a localized cooling effect, but you're still on fire.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2014, 01:17 PM   #8 (permalink)
EV convert
oil pan 4's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 9,614

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 228
Thanked 3,134 Times in 2,454 Posts
I think a wet shot of nitrous would be better.
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2014, 02:54 PM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
ecoTex's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 180

green VX - '95 Honda civic VX
Team Honda
90 day: 59.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 209
Thanked 162 Times in 47 Posts
Or you could use an electric traction motor

Toyota Prius - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

My adjustable WAI / HAI build thread

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2014, 04:38 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 276 Times in 226 Posts
Im wondering if the "wet" or fuel added would negate any fuel economy using NOS over forced induction? Is the fuel used during the shot the same used for a turbo application? At least with the NOS you can use a switch to arm it, rpm range or a progressive setup where as the turbo is always on.

Ive toyed around with the idea of a chemical intercooler or methanol water injection or using that in place of the fuel when spraying NOS so you keep your MPG?

Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
I think a wet shot of nitrous would be better.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com