Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-29-2009, 10:16 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: KC
Posts: 62
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Stirling engine in lieu of radiator

I was reading an article in Racecar Engineering and thought I'd pass along the clever idea that I read. One of the racecar engineers (speaking about a prototype Ricardo diesel engine) mentioned the idea of using a Stirling engine to power some accessories instead of wasting all that heat with a radiator. The key thing about the idea was that the intent was to decrease aerodynamic drag.

I thought this was a clever bit. First, you'd get an immediate gain from blocking the grill and then you'd get a secondary efficiency gain by recovering wasted energy to power to run accessories like an electric water pump, alternator, etc.

The only thing that I'd add to the idea is a water jacketed turbo. If you want lots of heat...that's a good place to find it!

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-29-2009, 10:55 AM   #2 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,745

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,324
Thanked 749 Times in 476 Posts
There are a few threads on thermoelectrically recovering waste heat from the exhaust, for example VW Golf with exhaust thermoelectric power: +5% MPG . But maybe putting thermoelectrics on the radiator might be a good idea. I'd think it's at least as hot as the tailpipe. And aspera is right: maybe the best place to recover waste heat from is the turbo or intercooler.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2009, 11:53 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
FastPlastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 419

98 Cherokee - '98 Jeep Cherokee
90 day: 17.18 mpg (US)

ZX7R Ninja - '99 Kawasaki ZX7R Ninja
90 day: 42.45 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Interesting idea. You may still want some cooling, but not nearly as much. Stirling engines work off the temperature difference, so the cooler you can get the cold side, the more power you can generate.
__________________

Adjusted for my driving habits. 80%city/20%Highway.
20mpg city/30mpg highway or bust! Check out my mods so far
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2009, 02:22 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
Even a Stirling needs a heat sink. Since the heat rejection will presumably be at a lower delta-T the "radiator" would have to be even bigger.

Stirlings are awfully heavy/bulky for the power you get. They may be of value in stationary or even marine applications, but I doubt they would be worth the space/weight/cost on a land vehicle that rarely operates at over 50% of rated power.

Again, a technology that has not been widely used for good reason.
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2009, 03:26 PM   #5 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Where does one get a Stirling engine?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2009, 06:11 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
FastPlastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 419

98 Cherokee - '98 Jeep Cherokee
90 day: 17.18 mpg (US)

ZX7R Ninja - '99 Kawasaki ZX7R Ninja
90 day: 42.45 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Can't say I've seen anyone selling a big one. Only ones I've found were little models like this one "The Stirling Design External Combustion Engine". For the most part they are relatively simple machines. So I'm guessing it's more of a, you need a big one, you build it.
__________________

Adjusted for my driving habits. 80%city/20%Highway.
20mpg city/30mpg highway or bust! Check out my mods so far
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2009, 09:43 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: KC
Posts: 62
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw View Post
There are a few threads on thermoelectrically recovering waste heat from the exhaust, for example VW Golf with exhaust thermoelectric power: +5% MPG . But maybe putting thermoelectrics on the radiator might be a good idea. I'd think it's at least as hot as the tailpipe. And aspera is right: maybe the best place to recover waste heat from is the turbo or intercooler.
Thanks for the link. It looks like engineers are all working on ways to delete alternators and/or recover waste heat energy. Thermoelectrics on the radiator sounds like a good way to get a relatively constant difference in temperature, but much smaller than the difference between EGT and ambient temp.

One thing that came to mind in the other thread was the cost of the parts. Manufacturers would save loads of money if they didn't have to put alternators on engines. That's a lot of weight off the nose of the car, too.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2009, 09:51 PM   #8 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
I don't know about alot of weight... most alternators are in the <20# range, aren't they?

I can see how it would save money, because of the "complex" electronics that are used with alternators, and of course, it would save drag on the engine, and make the "total package" more compact, so there is really no reason to *not* get rid of the alternator.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 03:07 PM   #9 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
A Stirling engine won't be a good replacement for a radiator. There are several reasons why. First it will act as a layer of thermal resistance to the cooling system of your other engine which can lead to over heating. Secondly your thermostat isn't open all the time and tends to release hot coolant in pulses (Stirling engines are only efficient with a constant supply of heat). The problem with the extra cooling area has already been mentioned.

Stirling engines work best with constant heat supply and a constant load at a constant speed. The best place for a Stirling engine to recover heat energy from would be the exhaust.

This company makes a Stirling engine however I doubt you can afford it. Infinia Corporation
I applied there for a job last year.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 06:55 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,805

Appliance White - '93 Geo Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Chevy Sprint Base
Thanks: 91
Thanked 460 Times in 328 Posts
The Stirling was much improved, but rendered more mysterious, in the free-piston type. Now, the latest development is the thermoacoustic Stirling, in which the only moving part is a magnet, and efficiencies are up to 30% - close to the Carnot limit using normal burners. It would not do that well on exhaust, already cooled by expansion, but it looks better than many other techniques. The motors consist of heavy tubing with heat exchangers at each end, with careful shaping and a magnet and pickup coil in the middle.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Stirling Engine Hybrid Car ConnClark Hybrids 3 04-29-2009 11:50 PM
Moving air intake into the engine compartment? pasadena_commut Aerodynamics 5 07-25-2008 04:24 PM
Coasting experiment: engine on VS engine off on a fixed route = 12.9% gain MetroMPG Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 6 02-22-2008 09:38 AM
Basic EcoDriving Techniques and Instrumentation SVOboy Instrumentation 2 11-17-2007 12:38 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com