01-09-2019, 01:56 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,230
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,229 Times in 1,719 Posts
|
Survey says: Chevrolet is more reliable than Honda and Toyota!
Those are all of the useful details from the ad. Obviously, it is Chevrolet.
Based on a survey?
Data?
Quote:
That claim would come as a surprise to anyone familiar with reliability rankings from the most trusted nonprofit testing cars these days. In fact, if you dug into the data, you’d have to conclude Chevy’s claim is dubious at best (and incredibly misleading at worst).
Consumer Reports ranks Chevy among the least reliable car companies.
Going by 2019 Consumer Reports rankings, Chevrolet ranked 23rd among 29 car brands evaluated. That made Chevy vehicles seventh-worst overall. The Traverse SUV and Silverado 2500 HD pickup showed up among the year’s poorest-scoring vehicles for reliability.
|
Quote:
So what about those other brands Chevy bragged it was beating in its TV commercial? Well, they would be surprised to learn they were less reliable than Chevy. After all, Toyota places first or second in reliability studies every year. If you looked at the decade’s 20 most reliable vehicles, 10 are Toyotas. None are Chevys.
Honda also consistently ranks among the top 10 auto brands for reliability. (Its 2019 rating was an exception.) As for Ford, the Dearborn-based automaker typically lands in the middle of the pack — but usually better than Chevy.
|
Quote:
If you look at the fine print in Chevy’s ad — and we recommend doing this for any car commercial — you’ll see a footnote referencing a 2015 study by Ipsos. It also suggests viewers head to ChevyReliability.com to learn more about the study.
Anyone who typed in that web address would find themselves redirected to a page authored by Chevy’s press team with details on the study. Apparently, market-research company Ipsos came up with the results that looked great for Chevy based on vehicles in service from December 2014 to June 2015. About 49,000 people completed the surveys.
So Chevy’s claim that its vehicle scored so well on “a recent nationwide survey” doesn’t really hold water. A lot can change in four years for a car model. Meanwhile, that sample looks very small compared to annual Consumer Reports surveys that include data from over 500,000 replies.
|
https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertain...-ad-says.html/
A four year-old survey.
Quote:
This study, performed by Ipsos, surveyed owners of Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac versus competitive brands in the area of parts replaced or repaired in the past 12-months – excluding fluids, filters and those related to accident/collision.
|
This is not Chevrolet, it is GM.
Quote:
For the purpose of this study, reliability is defined as the percentage of vehicle owners who reported they have not repaired or replaced any vehicle components in the past 12 months (excluding fluids, filters and those related to accident/collision).
|
Quote:
Using a nationwide sample, a total of 840,979 non-sponsored letter invitations were mailed to 2015 Model Year vehicle owners (time in service starting December 2014 to June 2015).
Via the survey, respondents were screened to ensure they still owned or leased the vehicle and ensure they were the original owners of the vehicle. All data was weighed to reflect the population of model ownership.
In total, 48,679 surveys were completed.
|
https://www.chevrolet.com/content/da...lity-Study.pdf
They then list the thirty-two brands of cars these people owned.
Is it significant that less than 6% of people receiving junk mail responded?
1. Do you still own or lease this vehicle?
2. Are you the original owner of the vehicle?
3. Has your vehicle required a repair in the last twelve months?
Quote:
Consumer Reports obtains its reliability data from an Annual Questionnaire that is sent to members of CR.org and Consumer Reports magazine. In all, we received responses on over 500,000 vehicles in our latest survey, detailing 2000 to 2018 models.
|
More than ten times as many responses and the inquire regarding cars up to eighteen years old, instead of up to twelve months old.
Cars really break down the first year?
Quote:
In the questionnaire, we ask members to note any problems with their cars that occurred in the past 12 months. They are asked to identify problems that they considered serious (because of cost, failure, safety, or downtime). We ask them to include problems covered by warranty, but not the ones resulting from accident damage or due solely to recall. Respondents check off problems from a list of trouble areas, ranging from the engine and transmission to climate system, brakes, electrical system, and power accessories. They also tell us specifically what their experiences were to help us understand precisely what problems they are having. (See the full list of trouble spots below.)
|
It sounds like they forgo the first two questions and expound greatly on the last one.
Quote:
Since 2015, we use an online questionnaire exclusively instead of our previous mix of electronic and paper ballots from members. That change shrank our respondent pool, but the Internet-only survey allows us to ask more in-depth questions and solicit detailed comments about problems.
|
Yay! Saving the world! Woo!
Quote:
Problems with the engine-major, engine cooling, transmission-major, and drive system are more likely to take a car out of service and to be more expensive to repair than the other problem areas. Consequently, we weigh these areas more heavily in our calculations of model year Overall Reliability Verdict. Problems such as broken trim and in-car electronics have a much smaller weight. Problems in any area can be an expense and a bother, though, so we report them all in the Reliability History charts.
|
https://www.consumerreports.org/car-...liability-faq/
So, the Ipso-facto survey treats a blown head gasket or thrown rod equally with a panel gap.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
01-09-2019, 02:45 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,265
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
So buy a 2015?
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
01-09-2019, 02:54 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,230
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,229 Times in 1,719 Posts
|
Consumer Reports' 2015 Annual Auto Reliability Survey
- Lexus
- Toyota
- Audi
- Mazda
- Subaru
- Kia
- Buick
- Honda
- Hyundai
- Mini
- BMW
- Volvo
- Volkswagen
- Porsche
- Nissan
- Lincoln
- Ford
- Acura
- GMC
- Chevrolet
- Mercedes-Benz
- Chrysler
- Dodge
- Infiniti
- Cadillac
- Ram
- Jeep
- Fiat
https://www.consumerreports.org/cars...bility-survey/
Toyota was #2 (and #1), Honda was #8, and Chevrolet was #20--out of 28.
|
|
|
01-09-2019, 03:22 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,743
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,471 Times in 3,436 Posts
|
The thing is, I've never cared how reliable a car is while under warranty. It's not my problem regardless.
Reliability matters after the vehicle is out of warranty and owners are stuck with the bill for repair.
Perhaps VW has better than average reliability for vehicles under warranty, but there's no way the older vehicles hold up better than average.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-10-2019, 03:52 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
The thing is, I've never cared how reliable a car is while under warranty. It's not my problem regardless.
|
True, but then I've never bought a car that came with a warranty :-) There's really no point in trying to assess reliability until it's at least a decade old.
|
|
|
01-10-2019, 04:12 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,743
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,471 Times in 3,436 Posts
|
I bought a 2006 Acura in 2010, so I think the bumper to bumper had just expired, but the powertrain should have been covered for another 2 years.
Still, I don't expect major problems within the first 6 years of ownership.
I just had the first thing fail on my Acura, which is the cruise control switch. Bought a new one for $1 and haven't put it in yet, but should be super easy.
It would be a shorter to list what hasn't been replaced multiple times on my 1998 Dodge 3/4 ton. To be fair, it's got 350,000 miles, but some basic parts like low pressure fuel pumps only go 20,000 miles before crapping out.
|
|
|
01-13-2019, 05:42 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,528
Thanks: 8,077
Thanked 8,871 Times in 7,323 Posts
|
The Lounge isn't your personal forum. I suggest you have the mods move this. How about https://ecomodder.com/forum/general-...iscussion.html
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
01-13-2019, 06:07 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Thalmaturge
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The edge of nowhere
Posts: 1,164
Thanks: 766
Thanked 643 Times in 429 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
|
This hasn't got anything to do with efficiency though. Seems perfect for the lounge.
|
|
|
01-13-2019, 06:40 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 1,372
Thanks: 324
Thanked 483 Times in 368 Posts
|
A bit surprised to see Kia and especially Audi up there. Honda and Toyota have both been rock solid as far as reliability goes, and from my own family's experience Honda has been a bit more reliable than Toyota, but you'll find people arguing for both. We've owned both (Sienna, Civic, Prius, Insight). Vehicles 10-15 years old.
__________________
2013 Toyota Prius C 2 (my car)
2015 Mazda 3 iTouring Hatchback w/ Tech Package (wife's car)
|
|
|
01-13-2019, 07:54 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
home of the odd vehicles
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 506
Thanked 867 Times in 654 Posts
|
Mini being above Chevy makes the whole data set suspect
I would expect mini somewhere below Chrysler
Further newer VWs are some of the biggest turds ever created, timing belts, injection pumps and failed auto transmissions just outside warranty.
The interior was uncleanable, even the glovebox broke, hidden bolt and all.
Last edited by rmay635703; 01-13-2019 at 08:02 PM..
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to rmay635703 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|