Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-11-2010, 03:28 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 8
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
How do "Performance Mods" effect a car's economy???

I accidentally stumbled upon this site and have become very intrigued with different ideas to improve my efficiency. I would like a car that can get good gas mileage but can still be pretty quick when needed. I would like to know if anybody has any insight as to how adding things like intake, headers, and/or exhaust to a car would impact its efficiency? Im looking to have a car make decent power while still maintaining the stock fuel injectors and fuel pump. Thanks in advance!

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-11-2010, 09:00 AM   #2 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...it "takes" a certain amount of power to drive 55mph due to aero+rolling losses, so ANY improvements in power (HP) "making" ability--if bi-lateral--can likewise (usually) yield improvement in fuel economy (MPG).

NOTE -- by "bi-lateral" I mean something that's NOT just a "oneway" change, such as changing from smaller diameter carburetor jets (good for MPG) up to larger diameter jets (good for HP, but kills MPG).

...headers are a "give & take" situation--they "give" you power at the engine speeds where they "tune" but also "take" power at intermediate engine speeds...kinda like childrens' "teeter-totter" where one end is UP while the other end is DOWN but the 'middle' (pivot) location never changes...the process of "tuning" is a proverbial "...rob Peter to pay Paul..." situation.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2010, 09:20 AM   #3 (permalink)
Almost fuel free!
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 24
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Check out Autospeed's website, they have a few articles on setting up cars for both performance and fuel economy
Browser Warning
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2010, 03:42 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
AeroModder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 471

Tank - '96 Ford Aspire 4 door
Team Ford
90 day: 46.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 65 Times in 48 Posts
The simplest ways to get better power and economy are to reduce parasitic power loss. This includes things like manual steering conversions, AC deletion, use thinner grade motor oil, reduce exhaust backpressure, as well as non-engine work like weight reductions. Reducing weight could be as simple as cleaning out your car or replacing a spare tire with a can of Fix-a-Flat to more expensive measures like fiberglass/carbon fiber hoods.

Power and economy can work hand in hand, but if one is going for maximum fuel mileage, power must be sacrificed.
__________________
In Reason we Trust
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2010, 04:10 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: N.C. / USA
Posts: 118
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Better efficiency on today's gasolines?

Have you ever wondered what this "gasoline" actually contains (or doesn't contain) per unit volume? I'm not looking to start a firestorm here, but has anyone smelled this "stuff" as you pump it into your gas tank? Smells oily to me.... Gasoline used to smell sharp! Comments?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2010, 09:25 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
comptiger5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 544

RaceJeep - '98 Jeep Grand Cherokee (ZJ) 5.9 Limited
90 day: 13.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
Performance mods can help FE. Some, such as roller rockers, free up parasitic power loss, which helps both power and mpg. Others, such as exhaust, reduce pumping losses. If you get a set of headers well tuned for low end and midrange, you'll gain low end torque, and possibly FE. You can also tune the computer for good performance when you put your foot down, and be efficient at part throttle (more timing = more power and FE, but needs higher octane).
__________________
Call me crazy, but I actually try for mpg with this Jeep:



Typical driving: Back in Rochester for school, driving is 60 - 70% city
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2010, 09:47 PM   #7 (permalink)
EV OR DIESEL
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 1,758

FarFarfrumpumpen - '03 Volkswagen Jetta Wagon GLS Premium

Quorra - '12 Tesla Model S P85
Thanks: 57
Thanked 113 Times in 86 Posts
Send a message via AIM to dremd
As a rule anything that moves the powerband up will hurt FE, this includes but is not limited to headers, cams, intakes.
Any reductions in parasitic loss will help, but keep in mind where they save x hp.
__________________
2016 Tesla Model X
2022 Sprinter
Gone 2012 Tesla Model S P85
Gone 2013 Nissan LEAF SV
2012 Nissan LEAF SV
6 speed ALH TDI Swapped in to a 2003 Jetta Wagon
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2010, 11:04 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lancaster Ca
Posts: 362

Tank - '76 Chevy El Camino Classic
90 day: 25.89 mpg (US)

Sabrina - '91 Mercedes Benz 190 E
90 day: 37.07 mpg (US)

Angel - '88 Mercedes-Benz 420SEL
Last 3: 23.01 mpg (US)

Quicksilver - '04 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG Cabrio
Thanks: 52
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroModder View Post
The simplest ways to get better power and economy are to reduce parasitic power loss. This includes things like manual steering conversions, AC deletion, use thinner grade motor oil, reduce exhaust backpressure, as well as non-engine work like weight reductions. Reducing weight could be as simple as cleaning out your car or replacing a spare tire with a can of Fix-a-Flat to more expensive measures like fiberglass/carbon fiber hoods.

Power and economy can work hand in hand, but if one is going for maximum fuel mileage, power must be sacrificed.
Whoah WHOOOAH DUde I'm all for performance parts Everyone knows that but i found one HUUUGE gap in your logic *Reduce Exhaust backpressure*
Yes it can be good to an extent but you also have to add in how much torque you may lose from different exhaust mods, Which may add horsepower however if you reduce your torque then you have to give the car MORE gas to make it perform the same in bottom end from lights and such, So you can't just put out things like that without backing Trust me i know
__________________


Tank:
(No actual EPA numbers for car just used F/E numbers when i first got it)
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2010, 11:08 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lancaster Ca
Posts: 362

Tank - '76 Chevy El Camino Classic
90 day: 25.89 mpg (US)

Sabrina - '91 Mercedes Benz 190 E
90 day: 37.07 mpg (US)

Angel - '88 Mercedes-Benz 420SEL
Last 3: 23.01 mpg (US)

Quicksilver - '04 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG Cabrio
Thanks: 52
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
One performance gain i've never heard of hurting FE is Advance your timing with running Higher octane fuel, I do it in my el camino i run 91 octane with advanced timing and it saves exactly 1 MPG
__________________


Tank:
(No actual EPA numbers for car just used F/E numbers when i first got it)
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2010, 11:09 PM   #10 (permalink)
EV OR DIESEL
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 1,758

FarFarfrumpumpen - '03 Volkswagen Jetta Wagon GLS Premium

Quorra - '12 Tesla Model S P85
Thanks: 57
Thanked 113 Times in 86 Posts
Send a message via AIM to dremd
reduced exaust backpressure will not help
2 reasons
1) the increased flow will be directly ofdfset with decreased throttle position.
2) reduced scavenging will bring the power band up.

__________________
2016 Tesla Model X
2022 Sprinter
Gone 2012 Tesla Model S P85
Gone 2013 Nissan LEAF SV
2012 Nissan LEAF SV
6 speed ALH TDI Swapped in to a 2003 Jetta Wagon
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Side mirror drag & effect on fuel economy - quantified MetroMPG Aerodynamics 179 11-10-2022 03:25 PM
Fuel Economy related papers tasdrouille General Efficiency Discussion 41 03-19-2021 06:31 PM
Article: Want cars to eat less? Put 'em on a diet MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 34 07-14-2013 01:38 AM
Excel PROVES why oil companies do not want more FE cars capn The Lounge 10 03-13-2010 11:24 AM
The New York Times: Economy Champs Get the Cold Shoulder akcapeco EcoModding Central 4 06-14-2008 12:42 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com