Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-18-2013, 07:22 PM   #11 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawk2100n View Post
I had been wondering what people did to calibrate the odo specifically on civics. I'll have to check my numbers now. I just replaced my 175 70 R 13s Prime Wells with a set of LRR Michelin Defenders 175 65 R 14 with aluminum rims from an 04 Civic hybrid.

Old were about 917 rev/mile
New are rated 905 rev/mile

wich gives a 1.31% difference

I always just use the stock calibration on my scan gauge for its numbers however my fuel econ numbers come from the stock odometer versus gallons pumped with no correction and no scangauge data. Perhaps I should do some analysis on my new and old setups to see if any big adjustments are in the cards for me. I still have the old tires so it would be easy. A 5.5% bump would be huge even if it is only an arbitrary number at that point with no actual bearing on consumption.
The revs/mile of tirerack are just corporate reporting. Worth testing for yourself in the real world conditions of your car and specific set up. The GPS I'm playing with has confirmed, almost, what ridewithgps.com showed me... so if you don't have a GPS, plot out your daily commute carefully on ridewithgps.com and compare what your OEM odo reports. I'd like to know, because I still find my calibration correction astonishing and hard to believe. I'm waiting for an error to appear.

__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-18-2013, 10:04 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,016

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 48.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
I recently put a new set of tires on my truck. The old tires were not quite down to the wear bars. The revolutions per mile changed about 1%. There is also a tire pressure effect where increased pressure reduces the revolutions per mile. I do not know if that effect is significant, but it is definitely there.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2013, 10:43 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMichler View Post
There is also a tire pressure effect where increased pressure reduces the revolutions per mile. I do not know if that effect is significant, but it is definitely there.

it's a steel belt.....40 or 50 psi isnt going to change the diameter
__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2013, 11:10 PM   #14 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 433 Times in 283 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMichler View Post
I recently put a new set of tires on my truck. The old tires were not quite down to the wear bars. The revolutions per mile changed about 1%. There is also a tire pressure effect where increased pressure reduces the revolutions per mile. I do not know if that effect is significant, but it is definitely there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcrews View Post
it's a steel belt.....40 or 50 psi isnt going to change the diameter
Seems to me it could, if the lower pressure is allowing a flat spot. The smaller effective diameter of the flat spot leads to higher revs/mile. Increasing pressure can push that out closer to round, making the tire act like it's bigger.
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 09:38 AM   #15 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
I can see low pressure with a car sitting on top of it, allowing deformation and reduced diameter. Higher pressures really shouldn't stretch the steel belts past nominal size. I'd think higher pressures would increase resistance to deformation (=LRR) without an actual increase in diameter.

This doesn't account for people like Ford specifying really low pressures in their Firestones for a cushy ride, but if reasonable people set the spec, going to max sidewall or beyond shouldn't affect size.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 11:04 AM   #16 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Charlie View Post
I can see low pressure with a car sitting on top of it, allowing deformation and reduced diameter. Higher pressures really shouldn't stretch the steel belts past nominal size. I'd think higher pressures would increase resistance to deformation (=LRR) without an actual increase in diameter.

This doesn't account for people like Ford specifying really low pressures in their Firestones for a cushy ride, but if reasonable people set the spec, going to max sidewall or beyond shouldn't affect size.
This makes sense, but I think Pale still has a point. If the OEM psi spec is low enough to allow deformation under the car's weight (which it does of course) then higher pressure might help the tire keep more of its max design diameter. If the car makers factor the deformation into their expectations for the odometer/speedometer, then wouldn't higher pressure produce fewer revs per mile? What am I misunderstanding?
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 12:25 PM   #17 (permalink)
Coasting in the Carolinas
 
wolydotmatrix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: CLT, NC
Posts: 33

Blue - '94 Honda Civic DX
Team Honda
90 day: 47.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Does the outter diameter actually change? Does the tire just touch more ( or less) of the road. A ballons circumference will change due to its phisical properties. Does the total circumference change or does the tire just become more round?
__________________
Proper Prior Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 02:05 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,016

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 48.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
Increased pressure causes the cords, even steel cords, to get longer. The exact amount is pretty small for steel cords. I did some rough calculations that seem to show the effect is too small to measure. But it is there.

Increased pressure will make for a smaller contact spot. I don't know if this changes revolutions per mile in a car tire.

I know that tire pressure changed revolutions per mile in a bicycle tire. I could tell the tire pressure from the odometer distance for a known trip.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JRMichler For This Useful Post:
California98Civic (06-19-2013)
Old 06-19-2013, 03:03 PM   #19 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by wolydotmatrix View Post
Does the outter diameter actually change? Does the tire just touch more ( or less) of the road. A ballons circumference will change due to its phisical properties. Does the total circumference change or does the tire just become more round?
Q: Does outer diameter actually change?
A: Yes!

FWIW, the "loaded" tire diameter (what you'd use to calculate tire-revolutions per mile) is typically about 0.97 of the tires un-loaded diameter (my analysis of Michelin and Goodyear tire data)

But, the amount of diameter INCREASE from higher airpressure is MUCH smaller due to the constricting force of the steel belts (<0.03).
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to gone-ot For This Useful Post:
California98Civic (06-19-2013), mcrews (06-19-2013), PaleMelanesian (06-19-2013)
Old 06-19-2013, 04:26 PM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
you gotta love Mr. Wiki!!!!

__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com