04-22-2021, 11:15 AM
|
#61 (permalink)
|
Somewhat crazed
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,431
Thanks: 541
Thanked 1,208 Times in 1,065 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH
I get it. I prefer wagons but the cheapest wagon left in the US market is a $41,000 Volvo V60.
So it looks like my next vehicle will be a crossover.
|
Depends on your definition of wagon. Those hearse look alike GM products with awful mileage come to mind
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
04-22-2021, 12:08 PM
|
#62 (permalink)
|
AKA - Jason
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,601
Thanks: 325
Thanked 2,147 Times in 1,454 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
The Metro was fairly extreme for its ground clearance in its cohort.
Also, mine FORMERLY had 6.3" of clearance... :P
|
The 2020 Mitsubishi Mirage also has 6.3 inches of ground clearance. It is on the high side while the Sonic was on the low end. Most are in the mid 5 inch range. Yaris 5.3 inches, Versa Note 5.5 inches, Kia Rio 5.5 inches, Hyundai Veloster 5.6 inches.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
The Chevy Trax is probably illustrative of the trend of going from a car to a CUV/Crossover format. It's built on the Sonic platform/chassis, which had 4.9" ground clearance.
I'd wager if you compared clearance for CUV's developed from car platforms, the majority (if not all) are jacked up relative to the car they're based on.
|
Certainly most will have a modest increase in ride height. Going from somewhere in the 5 inch range to somewhere in the 6 inch range.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotrsko
Depends on your definition of wagon. Those hearse look alike GM products with awful mileage come to mind
|
You will need to be more specific on which Chevy crossovers you think look like a hearse.
However, that comes back to my point - what is a "Crossover". It has no real definition and has become a catch-all classification for anything that isn't a clearly a sedan, truck, or van. It is a marketing term more than anything.
A VW Alltrack is just about the perfect vehicle for me. I don't need AWD but the 7 inches of ground clearance is high enough for forest service roads but the car isn't so tall that it is hard to put things in a topbox or roof rack. It carries 4 adults with gear OK although the rear seat is a bit cramped.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to JSH For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-22-2021, 12:50 PM
|
#63 (permalink)
|
Somewhat crazed
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,431
Thanks: 541
Thanked 1,208 Times in 1,065 Posts
|
The might be 'burbs, I dunno. They are black tall and ugly, I 've only seen a couple, always black with little chrome and limo tint windows.
|
|
|
04-24-2021, 10:45 AM
|
#64 (permalink)
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
Imagine someone in 1979 trying to convince you that in the year 2021, people would be driving CUVs, and that THIS was "futuristic" :
( This the 1980 AMC Eagle )
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cd For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-24-2021, 12:29 PM
|
#65 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,819
Thanks: 4,327
Thanked 4,480 Times in 3,445 Posts
|
I liked when cars had bumpers you could bump into something with and not get a $1000 bill to repair.
|
|
|
04-24-2021, 01:03 PM
|
#66 (permalink)
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cd
Imagine someone in 1979 trying to convince you that in the year 2021, people would be driving CUVs, and that THIS was "futuristic" :
( This the 1980 AMC Eagle )
|
BTW folks, in case you were not familiar with the car in the previous post, this is not a station wagon that someone modified with ridiculous wheels.
They actually sold this thing back in 1980.
And about the bumpers- i think it would be possible to have bumpers that are not 'tacked on' and ugly, but still not destroy the rest of the car if meerely brushed up against.
|
|
|
04-24-2021, 01:38 PM
|
#67 (permalink)
|
AKA - Jason
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,601
Thanks: 325
Thanked 2,147 Times in 1,454 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
I liked when cars had bumpers you could bump into something with and not get a $1000 bill to repair.
|
That is why I'm a fan of current bumpers. They can take a pretty good hit (straight on) and flex back into place. Old metal bumpers would dent from those hits.
Move beyond the design limits though and the old metal bumpers win.
|
|
|
04-24-2021, 02:04 PM
|
#68 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,819
Thanks: 4,327
Thanked 4,480 Times in 3,445 Posts
|
I whacked a parked car with a 1985 Volvo at about 10 MPH when I was 17, and no visible damage was done to either vehicle. The rubber covered steel bumper absorbed the impact without even maring the other vehicle.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-24-2021, 05:42 PM
|
#69 (permalink)
|
AKA - Jason
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,601
Thanks: 325
Thanked 2,147 Times in 1,454 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
I whacked a parked car with a 1985 Volvo at about 10 MPH when I was 17, and no visible damage was done to either vehicle. The rubber covered steel bumper absorbed the impact without even maring the other vehicle.
|
Ah, you are talking about the really ugly rubber bumpers. I'm thinking of before bumpers grew rubber warts and still looked good.
|
|
|
04-24-2021, 07:08 PM
|
#70 (permalink)
|
Eco-ventor
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,645
Thanks: 76
Thanked 709 Times in 450 Posts
|
Ugly? These things are pieces of art:
__________________
2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jakobnev For This Useful Post:
|
|
|