Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-28-2011, 03:16 PM   #1 (permalink)
Muscle Car Modder
 
Floordford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nashville
Posts: 117

QuikSilver - '00 Ford Mustang GT
90 day: 24.7 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Possibly an awful idea

So on a normal car before 08, or so, doesn't have any ignition or fuel canceling programing for cruising. Instead of giving a car a whole new custom ECM, which could cost $100-300, could 1 piston or 2 be shut off manually without too adverse of effects?

As I thought about it here are the negative things I came up with. I know it would make the engine run very choppy. Also that disabled piston in still compressing air which takes energy. If a car needs 20 horsepower to stay in motion at 60mph it will probably need 20hp @ 60mph no matter the pistons that get it there. It would mess with the vacuum and possible throw misfire codes.

But does anyone know of any aftermarket programing to let an older car do what these newer cars are doing?

__________________
2000 Mustang GT
273hp/ 309ft.lbs.
Cd 0.36 Im working on it
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-28-2011, 06:54 PM   #2 (permalink)
5 Gears of Fury
 
War_Wagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vancouver B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,230

Spunky - '90 Honda Civic CX
90 day: 35.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 175
Thanked 176 Times in 137 Posts
Well if your idea was just to shut off the injector to that cylinder manually, I can see another issue. The air being drawn in to the non-firing cylinder would then be forced out into the exhaust, the O2 sensors would read 4 cylinders worth of air and only 3 cylinders worth of burnt fuel, and the computer would think the engine is running way too lean and richen up the 3 cylinders that were still firing. At least I think that's what would happen, though I may be totally wrong!
__________________
"Don't look for one place to lose 100 pounds, look for 1600 places to lose an ounce." - Tony DeFeo
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2011, 09:47 PM   #3 (permalink)
Muscle Car Modder
 
Floordford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nashville
Posts: 117

QuikSilver - '00 Ford Mustang GT
90 day: 24.7 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Good point too. Maybe the newer cars with the cylinder canceling systems compensate for that in the programing. Im not sure how to counteract for that being a shade tree guy. I wonder if welding the O2 very far upstream would help. If the cylinder closest to the firewall was deadend but the O2 was placed in the area of the 3rd piston it might help. But no guarantees. Its still getting hit with only 3 fires instead of 4 but at least its not 3 fires and a shot of cooler air.
__________________
2000 Mustang GT
273hp/ 309ft.lbs.
Cd 0.36 Im working on it
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2011, 10:56 PM   #4 (permalink)
Depends on the Day
 
RH77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,761

Teggy - '98 Acura Integra LS
Sports Cars
90 day: 32.74 mpg (US)

IMA - '10 Honda Insight EX
Team Honda
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)

Tessie - '06 Acura TSX Base
90 day: 28.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 41 Times in 35 Posts
This has been tried many times without success. I tried a cylinder deactivation project back in 2007 by cutting the injectors, but it didn't work. The ECU expects more oxygen from the 02 sensors and dumps more fuel in the mix. Plus, the setup created quite a lot of vibration in . The only way this works is to physically close the valves and re-program the fuel delivery.

It's a great idea, but difficult to implement.
__________________
“If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research” ― Albert Einstein

_
_
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2011, 09:23 AM   #5 (permalink)
Muscle Car Modder
 
Floordford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nashville
Posts: 117

QuikSilver - '00 Ford Mustang GT
90 day: 24.7 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
I wonder how the newer vehicles compensate for that vibration.
__________________
2000 Mustang GT
273hp/ 309ft.lbs.
Cd 0.36 Im working on it
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2011, 11:51 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903

honda cb125 - '74 Honda CB 125 S1
90 day: 79.71 mpg (US)

green wedge - '81 Commuter Vehicles Inc. Commuti-Car

Blue VX - '93 Honda Civic VX
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
I think they compensate by having slightly heavier fly wheels, with a v6 or 8v engine you kill half the cylinders so the firing is still balanced just less often, with the Honda civic hybrid they kill 3 of the 4 cylinders and close the valves of the dead cylinders then use the motor that is part of the fly wheel, to even out the firing so it runs smoothly, the closed valves alow the o2 sensor to work properly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2011, 01:43 PM   #7 (permalink)
Muscle Car Modder
 
Floordford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nashville
Posts: 117

QuikSilver - '00 Ford Mustang GT
90 day: 24.7 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Wow. So valve and camshaft modification is required. I know some cars come with butterfly valves in the intake manifold to help with low end torque, i wonder if they could be modified to independently close to achieve a similar operation.
__________________
2000 Mustang GT
273hp/ 309ft.lbs.
Cd 0.36 Im working on it
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2011, 10:13 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
comptiger5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 544

RaceJeep - '98 Jeep Grand Cherokee (ZJ) 5.9 Limited
90 day: 13.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
^ Yup. If you don't close the valves, you're saving nothing, even putting the fueling issues aside. You need to make those cylinders stop pumping air to gain anything in the pumping loss department.
__________________
Call me crazy, but I actually try for mpg with this Jeep:



Typical driving: Back in Rochester for school, driving is 60 - 70% city
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 01:54 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194

White Whale - '07 Dodge Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 37.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
In theory, there are ways to get around things like the O2 sensor and the pumping loses. For example, you could block off your intake and/or exhaust ports on the deactivated cylinders, and drill holes through the deactivated pistons.

However, the issue that is going to be extremely hard (or even impossible) to get around is the vibration issue. This is going to depend a lot of the specific engine that you have. Engines that use cylinder deactivation have been specifically designed so that they're still mechanically balanced even when cylinders are deactivated. You have to realize that an engine doesn't really run at a "constant" speed--the crankshaft (and everything else) is constantly undergoing acceleration and deceleration. A lot is going to depend on the configuration of your specific engine (number of cylinders, firing order, cylinder V angle, flywheel design, etc.).

That being said, I'm not saying this can't be done--but you better really know what you're doing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 10:12 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
GM does it by disabling injectors and the pushrods on four cylinders. It works really well but needed a LOT of engineering - beyond your average Joe.

__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com