Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-28-2009, 11:08 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
QuickLTD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 188

Flying Brick - '96 Pontiac Bonneville SE
90 day: 23.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 15 Times in 8 Posts
Send a message via AIM to QuickLTD Send a message via Yahoo to QuickLTD
Tuft Testing Questions

I want to tuft the nose of the car to see what the "holes" are doing but I have a few questions first. Is there a generally accepted spacing and length for the yarn? Also I will be having another vehicle filming me. Is there a recommended distance either to the side or front that vehicle should be so their wake turbulence does not seriously affect the airflow over my car? The MPH should be 50 at a minimum because Aerodynamics become active around 45MPH if my understanding is correct?

Thanks
Dean

__________________
1996 Pontiac Bonneville SE 3.8L V6
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-29-2009, 09:30 AM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
Aerodynamics become active as soon as you start moving! Seriously, you don't need to get up to 50 mph. You can do your testing at 35 with no problem (assuming no winds). There won't be any noticeable difference between 35 and 50. You have to get going REEEALLY fast (think jet fast) in order to substantially alter aerodynamic flow over a body.

If you have any question about how important aero is even at low speeds, click the 'tools' link on the top and go to the Aerodynamic & rolling resistance, power & MPG calculator - EcoModder.com. This will show you your % of rolling resistance vs aerodynamic drag. For most vehicles, even at 30 mph, 50% of your energy expended is going to overcome aero drag vs rolling resistance. So, even at very low speeds, its still very important.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2009, 01:11 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
QuickLTD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 188

Flying Brick - '96 Pontiac Bonneville SE
90 day: 23.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 15 Times in 8 Posts
Send a message via AIM to QuickLTD Send a message via Yahoo to QuickLTD
Thanks for that info. I didnt realize the amount of resistance at lower speeds. I went to the link but I am unsure of line four "frontal area." My uneducated guess would be "Area (ft2 ) 24.30" but thats because of the "ft" on that line.

The same body style ran from 92-99. A 92 has a slightly more blunt bumper/grille than my 96 but this info is the closest I could find

1992 Pontiac Bonneville
Cd 0.360
Area (m2 ) 2.258
Area (ft2 ) 24.30
Cd x m2 0.81
Cd x ft2 8.75

I posted this in "Ecomodder Central" because of its description "Discuss everything related to vehicle mods here, from ideas to experiments to results." If the Mods think its better placed in Aerodynamics then ship it over.
__________________
1996 Pontiac Bonneville SE 3.8L V6
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2009, 01:20 PM   #4 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
Those numbers are fine for estimating purposes. This isn't an exact science.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2009, 01:28 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
QuickLTD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 188

Flying Brick - '96 Pontiac Bonneville SE
90 day: 23.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 15 Times in 8 Posts
Send a message via AIM to QuickLTD Send a message via Yahoo to QuickLTD
LOL yeah I know. I'm not trying to split hairs but I do prefer to make smarter/informed decisions.

Thanks again
__________________
1996 Pontiac Bonneville SE 3.8L V6

Last edited by QuickLTD; 05-31-2009 at 10:52 AM.. Reason: Correcting my first grade spelling.. LOL
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2009, 06:37 PM   #6 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
Can you explain again what are you trying to see via tuft testing? "Holes" in the front of the car?

As for being filmed, you'll want that vehicle off to the side, not at all in front.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2009, 06:54 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
QuickLTD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 188

Flying Brick - '96 Pontiac Bonneville SE
90 day: 23.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 15 Times in 8 Posts
Send a message via AIM to QuickLTD Send a message via Yahoo to QuickLTD
Sure, The upper grilles and the four lower openings. I want to put the tufts right near the openngs and around the nose in general. The factory chin air dam has been missing since way before I owned the car and I have no cooling issues so it will not be replaced. Yes the air goes through the radiator I was just illustrating that it is not sealed between the radiator support and the hood. Interestingly enough the sides are sealed between the radiator and the nose. Really I am just trying to establish a baseline for my "improvements" LOL I tend to over think sometimes.

Thanks,
Dean



__________________
1996 Pontiac Bonneville SE 3.8L V6
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2009, 03:24 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,306
Thanks: 24,436
Thanked 7,384 Times in 4,782 Posts
tufts

Id be real wary of a film car anywhere near your nose.Is there an overpass in your area that your photographer could use.My dad and I gave up trying to film our Dodge truck from another car,and we ended up with him driving the thing under a bridge overpass while I stood above with camera and telephoto lense.No wind,no traffic.You can position yourself wherever you like for the proper perspective view.---------- You can also rig a pump-up garden sprayer with remote nozzle spraying forward of the area of interest above 20-mph.Dish soap and food coloring makes the solution stand out against the body color.It dries pretty fast,leaves a "history" of where it went,and you can do that alone.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2009, 03:08 AM   #9 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,750

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,336
Thanked 749 Times in 476 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
You can also rig a pump-up garden sprayer with remote nozzle spraying forward of the area of interest above 20-mph.Dish soap and food coloring makes the solution stand out against the body color.It dries pretty fast,leaves a "history" of where it went,and you can do that alone.
Same as driving in the winter with salt on the road...

How about mounting a camera on the car, maybe on something sticking slightly out. Maybe 2 cameras in different positions? Cfg83 put a webcam in his bumper when testing his Spring mounted Grill Block.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2009, 04:14 AM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 109
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
You can buy tiny cheap spy cameras off Ebay that would be fine for this and they are the size of chewing gum pack and weight well under an Oz, so hanging them out the front would be easy and almost invisible, just do multiple runs to get the different angles.
Dont go with the 320x240 to low a resolution for clarity.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Video: tuft testing (rear) 1993 Ford Mustang notchback MetroMPG Aerodynamics 12 02-05-2011 10:40 AM
My 300zx Tuft Testing Mods Video forgottenmindset Aerodynamics 4 09-16-2008 02:02 PM
Video: tuft testing rear wheel skirts - Geo Metro MetroMPG Aerodynamics 6 07-11-2008 09:26 AM
Tuft testing: how to nwbabybronco Aerodynamics 5 06-25-2008 12:43 PM
tuft testing on 93 Sentra back window jim-frank Aerodynamics 5 06-16-2008 05:59 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com