Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-05-2011, 02:22 PM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: duluth mn
Posts: 117
Thanks: 20
Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Okay there is nothing new about his idea....

Same problem exists too. Turbos spin at 100,000+ rpm. Alternators spin at 6000 rpm max.

There is a company that is marketing a design and the only way they are getting around the problems is a custom alternator driven by a rather large turbine.
Couldn't it just be geared down?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-05-2011, 02:25 PM   #12 (permalink)
A madman
 
brucey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WV
Posts: 1,018

Pequod - '17 Subaru Outback
90 day: 22.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 73
Thanked 183 Times in 98 Posts
Send a message via AIM to brucey
You can buy geared down turbos meant to be used as 'superchargers', as well.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2011, 04:18 PM   #13 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mnmarcus View Post
Couldn't it just be geared down?
It could but you will loose efficiency
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2011, 05:27 PM   #14 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Gears that withstand 100,000 rpms are not garden variety.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2011, 06:29 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Zerohour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PA
Posts: 314

Pooparu - '01 Subaru Outback Limited
90 day: 28.12 mpg (US)

Cop Car - '94 Chevy Caprice Interceptor 9C1
Last 3: 18.48 mpg (US)

Mini - '11 Mini Cooper
90 day: 37.63 mpg (US)

Gramps - '95 Subaru Legacy Postal
90 day: 23.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 17 Times in 10 Posts
I knew there was a reason I hesitated on posting this up. I know there are alot of nay-sayers about such an idea. But there are 50+ other variables that go into the rate of rotation...

...So does anyone know of any posts/documents about a completed unit? or semi-feasible prototype?
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2011, 06:43 PM   #16 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,891

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 506
Thanked 867 Times in 654 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConnClark View Post
Okay there is nothing new about his idea....

Same problem exists too. Turbos spin at 100,000+ rpm. Alternators spin at 6000 rpm max.

There is a company that is marketing a design and the only way they are getting around the problems is a custom alternator driven by a rather large turbine.
No offense but why does an electric producing body have to be an alternator?

An antique solid state magneto like device could make current at very hi RPM and be built into the shaft, no brushes = better
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rmay635703 For This Useful Post:
Zerohour (01-05-2011)
Old 01-05-2011, 07:33 PM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
NHRABill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 191

Tahoe - '95 Chevrolet Tahoe LT
90 day: 13.22 mpg (US)

SRX - '04 Cadillac SRX AWD

XL - '05 Harley Davidson Sportster XL
90 day: 49.97 mpg (US)

Alero - '02 Oldsmobile Alero GLS

Corvette - '75 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray
Thanks: 3
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
No need to gear them down when the small engine boost is reduced by using multiple alternators in a serpintine setup the gasses won't create much boost to begin with and will be lessesned by the load an excess can be dealt with via traditional means Blow off valve tube.

you also have to look at the type of turbo being used you can get a sealed unit where it will have more drag due to its internal oiling system as compared to a f low through like in older car models.

1,000 different ways and no one has actually done it yet and talked about it at least ...

Good topic for discussion my 1st comment is because I thought that it needs to be tied that is why I try and not draw too much attention to it untill I did it myself and then let the criticism come out.
__________________
2012 Chevrolet Traverse *active*
2002 Oldsmobile Alero GLS *active*
2002 S10 2wd p/u 139,000mi. *active*
1975 Corvette Stingray *active*
1994 Camaro Z28 Convertible 149k *Sold 2013*
1998 Blazer ZR2 189k *Sold 2012*
1995 Tahoe LT 250k *Sold 2011*

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NHRABill For This Useful Post:
Zerohour (01-05-2011)
Old 01-05-2011, 08:59 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
IamIan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 692
Thanks: 371
Thanked 227 Times in 140 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zerohour View Post
...So does anyone know of any posts/documents about a completed unit? or semi-feasible prototype?
I know this one from a company founded in 1966 ... been building Turbo-Alternators sense 1980.

Barber-Nichols: Engineering, Manufacturing, & Testing Climatics Test Chamber Blowers
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to IamIan For This Useful Post:
Zerohour (01-05-2011)
Old 01-14-2011, 02:18 AM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ivins UT
Posts: 213

the green machine :P - '97 Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ
90 day: 20.92 mpg (US)

Thee s10 - '00 Chevy S10
90 day: 24.27 mpg (US)

Freedom - '05 Kawasaki Ninja 250EX
90 day: 75.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 24 Times in 22 Posts
just put like a 1 inch gear on the turbo and a 6 inch gear on the alternater it's about a 36 to 1 gearing i think, if i did the math right so then thats about 2777 rpm on the alternater and at that gearing it should have quit a bit of torque, don't you think??? and you only need to have about a 16 to 1 gear reduction if the turbo hits 100000 rpm and make sure it doesn't take to much power from the engine from to much back pressure(at 36 to 1 gearing you could have it to where 4 pounds of exhaust pressure equals 144 pounds of torque on the alternater then a gain i could be wrong??? anyone???)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2011, 02:31 AM   #20 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Yep, you could be wrong.

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com