02-17-2017, 03:54 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
U.S. traffic fatalities jumped way up last year. Drive safe out there!
Quote:
The National Safety Council’s annual report on traffic deaths estimates that 40,200 people died in U.S. car crashes in 2016, which is up six percent from 2015 estimates, and a total increase of a terrifying 14 percent in just two years.
Additionally, the NHTSA claims that half of traffic fatalities are related to passengers not buckling their seatbelts, and around a third of estimated fatalities involved alcohol or drug impairment, according to The New York Times. The last time annual traffic deaths eclipsed 40,000 people was back in 2007, and despite the advancement of automotive safety features over the last decade, we’re going backwards.
|
From: Annual Traffic Deaths Rose To A Terrifying 40,200 People Last Year
And apparently, even when controlling for vehicle miles driven, the trend is going in the wrong direction (from a comment posted under that article):
Quote:
Buried in the actual report (not the NY times article referenced)
“The estimated annual mileage death rate is 1.25 deaths per 100 million vehicle miles traveled, an increase of 3% from the 2015 rate.”
|
Drive safe out there!!
To prevent complacency, I make YouTube dashcam crash video compilations a regular part of my time-wasting/entertainment diet. (Good discussion here: http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...war-34103.html)
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
02-17-2017, 08:44 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: US
Posts: 1,016
Chief - '06 Pontiac Grand Prix 90 day: 26.7 mpg (US) SF1 - '12 Ford Fiesta S 90 day: 30.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 195
Thanked 247 Times in 190 Posts
|
Given how people drive around here it's not all that surprising.
|
|
|
03-23-2017, 09:09 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Pine Plains, ny
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
people are morons and the car manufacturers are making cars for morons who cant see the car in front of them or next to them.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to barbierij For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-23-2017, 10:07 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
home of the odd vehicles
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 506
Thanked 867 Times in 654 Posts
|
A large percentage of the deaths are from the increase in highway deaths.
In our state the increase is directly related to an increase in deaths where highway speed limits have been increased.
As states increase speed limits to close the road funding gaps expect more highway deaths.
Trump is in the whitehouse republicans in all 3 branches of government, so expect roadway speeds to increase
(because obviously increasing funding isn't a tax increase)
and "personal responsibility " to rule the day.
|
|
|
04-12-2017, 04:35 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
EcoModding flying lizard
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 743
Thanks: 618
Thanked 264 Times in 176 Posts
|
Given the rise in popularity of texting/instagram, and other phone related distractions, this is to be expected. Although it is scary to see it actually coming true.
I love watching dashcam crash and bad driving videos. They really open up your eyes to how crashes happen, and how F***ing easy they are to prevent. One that seems really common is when traffic is piled up and stopped in the left lane of an intersection while the right lane is clear, idiot #1 comes FLYING BY in the right lane, meanwhile idiot #2 blindly turns in front of idiot #1 and gets t-boned. They don't even hesitate to look!
I think it should be mandatory for driving schools to give take home assignments in the form of car crash videos, have the students analyze them and see how to predict and prevent those situations. They have the potential to make so many people better drivers.
__________________
-Kaze o tatakaimasen-
Best trip in V6: 52.0
Best tank in V6: 46.0
Best tank in Mazda: 49.9
Best tank in CBR: 61.3
Best tank in SV: 83.9
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
You can lead a fashion-conscious horse to unusual-looking water...
|
|
|
|
04-12-2017, 04:54 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
Quote:
I love watching dashcam crash and bad driving videos. They really open up your eyes to how crashes happen, and how F***ing easy they are to prevent.
|
Same here.
PRO-TIP! I like playing the game of "predict the crash!" with my new-to-driving nephews. But make sure to watch foreign language ones... or if you're watching domestic ones, turn the volume down! Lots and lotsa swears.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-12-2017, 05:43 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
Well, my kids just got a new category of videos to watch.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
04-12-2017, 10:08 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 118
Thanks: 1
Thanked 33 Times in 24 Posts
|
It would be more useful if the statistics were accompanied by a breakdown of causes.
I would tend to blame distracted driving more than increased speed limits, however, the State Legislature here mandated increasing speed limits on interstate highways inside congested urban areas to 70 mph a few years ago, against the advice of experts. It is very difficult to merge into heavy traffic when it is going by at 70 or faster and the best you can make at the end of a steep onramp is 55 or 60.
Rural speeds are a different matter. Most rural freeways in the state are posted at 80 mph, which is fine with me -- and the experts. When I was a kid, it took 11 hours to drive between Salt Lake City and St. George. Now, you can drive it easily in less than half the time and much more safely (thank-you Pres. Eisenhower). I do miss stopping in Fillmore for dinner.
It could also be that more people are driving more frequently and further because of the generally lower gas prices.
|
|
|
04-13-2017, 03:47 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Volvo-driving MachYeen
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Finland
Posts: 788
Thanks: 298
Thanked 82 Times in 68 Posts
|
Here in finland, we are pretty egoistic in our cars, and have a aggressive driving as a collective mindset.
Suprisingly, fatal accidents are relatively low here due to inspections on cars, and low speed limits. We only have a couple highways with a 120Km/h speed limit, it's mostly 100.across the country.
On winters the max speed on highways is 80km/h
We have a lot of mooses, but we dont have animal-caused accidents a lot, either.
(Never dodge for animals smaller than a young deer)
Our garbage man swerved for a fox and drove the truck in a ditch. Oh boy he was pissed
__________________
If you don't make any mistakes in your life,
life itself will be a f*ckup.
With Volvo to Valhalla and back!
|
|
|
04-13-2017, 07:54 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
home of the odd vehicles
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 506
Thanked 867 Times in 654 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by acparker
It would be more useful if the statistics were accompanied by a breakdown of causes.
It could also be that more people are driving more frequently and further because of the generally lower gas prices.
|
Wisconsin lists the increase as highway deaths and it directly correlates to the increase in speed limits.
Deaths per mile traveled have gone up so throw that out as well.
Single vehicle accidents and rear ended accidents have increase as well (meaning distracted driving is just as deadly on the highway as it is in the city.)
And to think a $3 device could eliminate most distracted driving
|
|
|
|