06-30-2016, 06:02 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
PSmodder lurker
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chino
Posts: 1,605
Thanks: 26
Thanked 908 Times in 522 Posts
|
Uh oh, another Tesla autopilot crash fatality
The first of its kind, a fatality in Autopilot mode. RIP
https://www.teslamotors.com/blog/tragic-loss
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to botsapper For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
06-30-2016, 06:16 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,819
Thanks: 4,327
Thanked 4,480 Times in 3,445 Posts
|
That's a problem with tractor trailer design. They aren't made with the safety of other vehicles in mind, as the trailer is often just at about head height for most passenger cars.
Interesting to see that there have been fewer fatalities per mile in autonomous mode than for standard driving. I figured this would eventually be the case, but didn't realize it was already that good.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-30-2016, 08:36 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,668
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,187 Times in 813 Posts
|
I think their autonomous miles with no fatalities isn't that great when only compared to every other car on the road numbers. How many fatalities per mile are there in 0-5 year old $50,000+ sedans? They basically are trying to say, "Hey at least it's safer then an 11.4 year old Camary or Accord." because that is the average car, and I bet those cars in isolation actually beat the Tesla claim. Me thinks 30% above average fatality rate is not what a $75,000+ car shopper is going to be doing a lot of bragging about.
PS, Now consider this was a dry, clear, daylight, perfectly straight road, with no alcohol or speed involved. What is the average fatality per mile in those conditions? Again, without the autonomous feature activated I have heard Tesla bragging about being the safest car ever on the road. I bet this means you are 10 or even 100 times more likely to die if you use the autopilot. In their defense, one data point is not really useable, but they shouldn't try and use it either.
Last edited by Hersbird; 06-30-2016 at 09:06 PM..
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Hersbird For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-30-2016, 08:50 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,668
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,187 Times in 813 Posts
|
I guess the driver here was the same driver that recorded the near miss with the utility truck posted here before. Makes me wonder if he wasn't a little to dependant on a driving aide. I thought the utility truck incident was an easy thing for a human to spot, evaluate, and avoid without the drama assigned to the "near miss" of the autopilot oblivious to dangers until the last moment. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for this driverless car stuff, just pointing out Tesla should do less bragging about it, and humans need to be more aware of the limitations. The pioneers always take the arrows.
|
|
|
06-30-2016, 10:04 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
Interesting to see that there have been fewer fatalities per mile in autonomous mode than for standard driving. I figured this would eventually be the case, but didn't realize it was already that good.
|
I'm guessing that in general, high end luxury cars have a lower fatality rate than the national average, which will include things like barely legal old jalopies on bald tyres.
Sample size of one proves nothing of course.
|
|
|
06-30-2016, 10:21 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hersbird
Now consider this was a dry, clear, daylight, perfectly straight road, with no alcohol or speed involved. What is the average fatality per mile in those conditions?
|
That was my first thought as well. Fatality rate on freeways/highways, where autopilot is likely almost exclusively used, is going to be dramatically lower than on other roads.
|
|
|
07-01-2016, 12:04 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
|
I heard that the auto pilot system cut accidents by 50% in Tesla's.
In this case it sounded like the Tesla was driving into the sun as well, so a human driver wouldn't have done anything different.
|
|
|
07-01-2016, 12:16 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Northern California
Posts: 23
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
|
Quote:
Neither Autopilot nor the driver noticed the white side of the tractor trailer against a brightly lit sky, so the brake was not applied
|
This grabs my attention.
1) I wasn't there, but some amount of time passes before a jacknifing trailer makes it into your lane from the other side of the freeway. He could have panicked, he could've had a terrible reaction time, but I'm not convinced the driver was watching the road. Brightly lit sky is nicely included by the lawyers as some explanation, but the brakes were never applied in a fatal head on collision?
2) Who is familiar with the model S's sensor array? Am I wrong in thinking color and contrast doesn't matter at all here? The whole white trailer thing feels like a cop out. At some point before or after the high speed convertible conversion, the car should have done something if they wanted to call it autopilot.
Its fairly likely the driver wasn't present, and missed one of the most critical moments of his life because he was letting the car pay attention for him. If so, its very unfortunate and a little humbling. Regardless, the Tesla never knew what hit it, either because of a reflection and some sunlight, or because Tesla didn't anticipate obstacles above the hood. If I remember right, another driver tried to sue them because he left his car to self park (which he's totally liable for) and it repeatedly bumped into the back of a tractor trailer. Tesla is learning some harsh lessons, but just like every other manufacturer, they aren't going to let us know if they really got it wrong
My $0.02
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Pooft Lee For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-01-2016, 10:29 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
lurker's apprentice
Join Date: May 2008
Location: the Perimeter
Posts: 942
PlainJane - '12 Toyota Tacoma Base 4WD Access Cab 90 day: 20.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 504
Thanked 226 Times in 173 Posts
|
NYT has more. The guy was a tech geek and a big Tesla proponent.
http://nyti.ms/2992FVh
|
|
|
07-01-2016, 11:35 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,668
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,187 Times in 813 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryland
I heard that the auto pilot system cut accidents by 50% in Tesla's.
In this case it sounded like the Tesla was driving into the sun as well, so a human driver wouldn't have done anything different.
|
The guy had a dash cam plus the Tesla's camera should store some am out of time before a collision. I bet you could see the semi just fine. The problem was the driver wasn't watching and the car thought it was an overhead sign.
|
|
|
|