Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-28-2013, 12:37 PM   #31 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 26.69 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...wap-20678.html


the 4 banger in the sunfire was a piece of crap. All I was doing was fixing it and it never wanted to run. The 3800 gets good mileage and has plenty of power and I already have it.

FWD transmissions have chain/sprockets on the input side. They have to, to get the gears away from the crank axis. If you have a FWD, look into changing the chain and sprockets to a different ratio.

If I got 36 in the olds then it should be about the same in the sunfire. It weighs 800 lbs less and is more aerodynamic. Yeah, it'll be fast. That means I can get out of the way quicker. The old 4 banger got about 25 mpg with the gearing and high stall. The new converter has a 1420 stall and the gearing will be brought down and that should give me some decent mileage numbers to work with. I can always gear it down more later or put taller tires on it.

__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-29-2013, 12:08 AM   #32 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Honda100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: SE Asia
Posts: 74

MetroScoopy - '09 CHF50 Honda Metropolitan 50cc
90 day: 97.98 mpg (US)

Training Shoe - '99 Hyundai Hyundai Atoz Prime 797cc
90 day: 31.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
+1 on the 2.2 being really crap. I had a buddy with a 2.2 Cavalier and whenever we'd go places, he ask if we could drive my car (Ford Taurus SHO) because it would in fact get 2-3 mpg better. Not to mention I had twice the power, more space, better ride, more accessories etc.

I'll be blunt, I loathe GM for the most part. But there are a few things I like about them, and the 3800 is definitely one of them. That and the LS motors. 3800 is a great engine, no doubt about that. I can't imagine what a Sunfire would be like with one of those,
__________________
1988 Honda Super Cub 50cc
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2013, 12:37 AM   #33 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 26.69 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
I think it will be a lot of fun. I have seen a few vids on youtube of cavaliers with 3800's and they are FAST. I don't really care how fast it is, just so long as it goes when I want it to. I am trying to make the 4t60 fit because it will save a lot of money. The only thing I need to do is check the fit of the axle shafts. I will do that in the morning. It will be a little while, but I will post a video when it is done.
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2013, 01:15 AM   #34 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 26.69 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
I was just looking over the gear combinations and I can get an overdrive chain/sprockets for the input side and drop the final drive from a 2.84 to a 2.53.

I am wondering what this would do to my power in high gear.

The gearing would be as follows:

55 mph 65 mph
current gearing 1428 1687
new gearing 1272 1503

I am thinking a gear swap would put me too low on the power curve. I would literally be idling down the road. I don't want it to downshift to go up every hill do I?
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2013, 12:49 PM   #35 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 26.69 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
Don't tell me I did it wrong, I know I didn't follow the directions, but the air is attached on the rear window, so i am going to use the window as a starting point.
I was messing around with the aero template and came up with this:
Click image for larger version

Name:	blue temp.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	33.7 KB
ID:	12779 I will remove the spoiler and put a sharp edge around the back of the car for clean separation. What do you think?
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2013, 05:31 PM   #36 (permalink)
OCD Master EcoModder
 
brucepick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eastern CT, USA
Posts: 1,936

Outasight - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 54.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 431
Thanked 396 Times in 264 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by IsaacCarlson View Post
...
I am thinking a gear swap would put me too low on the power curve. I would literally be idling down the road. I don't want it to downshift to go up every hill do I?
Don't be afraid of a downshift. In this situation, I think it's a good thing.

At highway speeds, you pretty much want the engine running at low rpm so it's at maybe 60-70% load when cruising. Not super light throttle and 25% load, that would give you some engine braking constantly. The high loading puts you in the good part of the BSFC chart. Since it's running at kinda close to maximum output for its rpm, you will need more power if you want to maintain speed on a significant upgrade, or for acceleration. So you'll need a downshift for that.

If you don't need a downshift, you're running a lot more engine and/or a lot more rpms than you need. And your fuel economy will suffer.

Shucks, its an automatic. It will downshift for you. Now worries! With the tall gearing, the downshift won't bring the huge fuel economy penalty it would on a "normal" automatic.
__________________
Coast long and prosper.
Driving '00 Honda Insight, acquired Feb 2016.


  Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2013, 09:21 PM   #37 (permalink)
Master Ecomadman
 
arcosine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,156

sc1 - '98 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.17 mpg (US)

Airplane Bike - '11 home built Carp line Tour

rans - '97 rans tailwind

tractor - '66 International Cub cadet 129

2002 Space Odyssey - '02 Honda Odyssey EX-L
90 day: 28.25 mpg (US)

red bug - '00 VW beetle TDI

big tractor - '66 ford 3400

red vw - '00 VW new beetle TDI
90 day: 58.42 mpg (US)

RV - '88 Winnebago LeSharo
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 337 Times in 227 Posts
Swaping sprockets would be like driving into a 10 mph head wind with a 250 lb passenger.
__________________
- Tony

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2013, 06:29 PM   #38 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 26.69 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
WOOOOOOOT!!! IT FITS!!!!

After sitting all winter in a snowbank, I pulled the 4t60 out of the olds just to make sure it was the wrong spline count on the shaft. The reason I thought the shafts were different is because 3 transmission shops said they wouldn't fit and so did the parts info at the auto stores. I thought I was screwed. NOT! I stuck the stub shaft from the 4t40 in there and it fits on both ends. All I have to do is get different seals. I did not have the time to check last year to see if it really would fit. Not only will the shafts fit in the transmission, but I can use the entire sub frame and weld/bolt it right to the bottom of the sunfire, saving LOADS of time, money, and parts.

This is going to be awesome! Maybe you can't tell, but I am stoked. This is going to be a LOT easier than I thought. If I would have known this in the first place, I would have pulled the entire unit out of the olds and stuck it in the sunfire and would have been driving it all winter. At least now the motor and transmission can get a good cleaning, paint, new seals/gaskets, and new fluid before going in.

The gearing will stay at 2.84 for the time being. I can always change it later.
I will use the dogbones from the caddy for upper torque mounts. That should keep things from moving around in there.
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 08:44 PM   #39 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 724

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 26.69 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 67 Times in 50 Posts
If anyone wants to do a swap like this, the part numbers for the new axle seals are 710158 and 324204. These are National Seal numbers. It will be necessary to use the shaft sleeves from the sunfire. The shafts will pop right in.
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2013, 08:53 PM   #40 (permalink)
EcoModding Smurfer
 
Smurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: LaX
Posts: 293

Dime - '95 Chevy S10 LS ExtCab RWD
Pickups
90 day: 18.23 mpg (US)

G/A - '96 Pontiac Grand Am
Team Pontiac
90 day: 32.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 52
Thanked 35 Times in 29 Posts
Just the other day, I was telling the girlfriend about people taking the 3.8L Supercharged out of my Regal GS and putting it in the 1996-98 Grand Ams. But in a SUNFIRE?! If you were a speed racer kind of guy, you'd be on to something pretty fun there.

I know yours isn't the Supercharged variety, but you could consider it later. I routinely got 33-35MPG in my Regal with five adults in the car. Minus their 800 pounds, and all the luxuries (power leather, dual climate, etc) I'd imagine a Sunfire would achieve great MPG with the 3800.

Looking forward to pic and video updates!

__________________

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com