Quote:
Originally Posted by NHRABill
VW has no intrest in trying to meet the Safety Standards of North America because they feel it will not sell enough... Lots of great cars in Europe but it is the same story they fail safety and emission testing in the US.
Metroactive News & Issues | VW Lupo
Technically the Lupo was in The United States some time ago back then they called it a Fox. I remember a friend who had one it was a POS for sure but most cars were back in the late 80's
From what I just read it is Smaller than a Suzuki Swift aka Metro.... I will pass...
|
The lupo and the Fox are two different models. The fox is a little bigger and was bild specially to be cheap. The lupo was bild to be small but is more refined and more expensive.
I dont believe lupo 3l would have sold a lot in USA. In europe the lupo 3l didnt sell that much. For the same price of the lupo 1.2tdi you could buy the 1.4tdi and this one had aircondition, assisted direction, bigger tyres(ususally people relate to bigger security), faster, easier, less expensive to mantain, with electric windows, with better seats.... All that made people buy the 1.4tdi instead of the 1.2tdi. And in Europe we tend to have and appreciate more the efficient cars. In SUV country where bigger is better with low gasoline prices and some allergy to diesel cars (although the lupo is fitted standart to use biodiesel, i just found this reading the instruction manual)... the small and hyper efficient lupo would in my opinion have been a disaster.
I dont think it would have been hard to meet the safety tests, the lupo meets them all here in europe and for the polution dont think it would have benn hard (the lupo has 81g/100Km) but with low selling future maybe it would not worth the costs involved on it, i can easy understant VW reasons.