Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now

Reply  Post New Thread
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-15-2009, 03:20 AM   #31 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Western NC
Posts: 177
Thanks: 3
Thanked 43 Times in 19 Posts
If you force air in the engine, absolute pressure in the manifold will increase with increased pre throttle body pressure (throttle position being equal).

Higher pressures before the throttle plate have negligible effect on fueling in open loop ( or closed loop) unless you exceed the highest mapped pressure, the ecu will still be reading from the same section of the map tables regardless of how much air you cram in the intake tube. No correction beyond normal fluctuations would be required by the ecu.

Closed loop, different story. I think you are referring to a 350Z? WOT operation will never be 14.7, but between high 13's to high 12's. As far as most management systems go, closed loop is only triggered by throttle position, but I imagine some are pressure and/or rpm. There normally is no correction for open loop other than referencing manifold pressure and rpm, everything else is simply a multiplier of sorts, coolant temp, intake air temp, ect.

Granted, all this is in reference to a manifold pressure density type system, mass airflow system is a bit different

I must be falling behind, there is a system out now that has a correction based on egt's? Wonder how they pulled that one off...

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

Old 06-15-2009, 08:33 AM   #32 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cookeville, TN
Posts: 850
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
The only difference in open and closed loop is. . .the ECU gets data from one location or multiple. Open it gets data only from the MAP(MAF) and then plugs the data in and recovers how much fuel is needed. In open mode its more conservative and adds a little more fuel than it needs(I'm not talking 350z) to make sure it stays outside of lean. In closed it does what I just said and then the ECU takes data from O2 sensors(and nowadays alot more) and tries to get closer to what its mapped for. Eco cars are going to try to get right at 14.7 whereas sportier cars are going to hover around in the rich region and just have a tighter AFR band.

As far as the topic at hand is interested though a RAM air could theoretically improve FE, but I can't say for certain because I haven't tried it myself. I can't recall which user it was that has done it, but I believe them. WAI like I said is just a big restricter plate that pushes your driving tendencies towards ecohabits(unless you have lean burn and it has a required minimum AIT, then its a restricter and a system hack).
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2009, 12:02 PM   #33 (permalink)
Giant Moving Eco-Wall
DifferentPointofView's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Dale, IL (or A-Dale)
Posts: 1,120

The Jeep! - '95 Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ Laredo
90 day: 23.75 mpg (US)

The Caliber - '07 Dodge Caliber R/T
90 day: 30.6 mpg (US)

The 'Scort - '98 Ford Escort LX
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
why don't we all just get a diesel so we don't have to worry about throttle plates?

I have a new idea... In all new cars, take a coil spring from a truck, and use it for the gas pedal spring. Americans are lazy, and would rather work less and drive slower than push the pedal with lots of might to go 75mph. Seems like a crazy, might work plan to me

Yea.. I drive a Jeep and I'm on a fuel economy site, but you just wouldn't understand... "It's a Jeep thing!" *Jeep Wave*

Did I Use Too Many Abbreviations? Here's The Abbreviations List
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2009, 06:34 PM   #34 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: West
Posts: 145
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
I think the point being discussed is that WAI's suck, it's basically reducing your WOT HP potential of your engine.
If you have a ram air setup, it's irrelevant because the throttle body will just be open a little less to provide X-HP worth of air to cruise the car down the road.
Btw 14.7:1, while being the "optimal" fuel number, isn't always so.
When I had my ECU chipped and tuned for my Civic, we were running a wideband and got the cruise AFR to 16.0:1 before it started to lean pulse. That's 8.8% better efficiency right there, and I saw an increase in cruise mpg of 2-3 MPG.
Now if I had a crappy WAI I'm sure I would have ran into detonation before that point and would be running a more 14.7ish AFR...

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comparing Warm Air Intakes (WAI) & Cold Air Intakes (CAI) toomuch EcoModding Central 23 05-26-2019 05:41 AM
Honda IACV explained TomO Off-Topic Tech 16 12-21-2015 01:49 AM
Hot Air intake vs. Cold Air... why or why not? Blister General Efficiency Discussion 3 10-09-2008 10:01 AM
Grill block affected milleage mar5ka Aerodynamics 24 08-31-2008 10:17 AM
Moving air intake into the engine compartment? pasadena_commut Aerodynamics 5 07-25-2008 03:24 PM

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com