Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-11-2009, 11:39 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 356

Silver Turtle - '02 Ford Focus Zx3
90 day: 38.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Lightbulb WAI vs Ram Air Intake --- at speed...

I think that a Ram air intake would be BETTER (even though obviously at outside air temps) than a WAI at speed.

Why? Because the extra pressure would decrease losses in the intake manifold.

Kind of like this,

and pointing STRAIGHT into the air intake through one of these air filters
<-pretend its an air filter I couldnt find pictures of closed inline air filters

and STRAIGHT into the throttle valve...


I know, very theoretical to have everything STRAIGHT... but such is the case in my 350z...

??

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-11-2009, 11:52 PM   #2 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,761

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,548 Times in 2,215 Posts
There are formulas online for figuring the efficacy of ram air.

And this: http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...take-3394.html

And google "autospeed ram air" cuz they've done lots of piddling around with it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009, 08:24 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
basjoos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 1,073

Aerocivic - '92 Honda Civic CX
Last 3: 70.54 mpg (US)

AerocivicLB - '92 Honda Civic CX
Team Honda
90 day: 55.14 mpg (US)

Camryglide - '20 Toyota Camry hybrid LE
90 day: 65.84 mpg (US)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 642 Times in 289 Posts
In general, anything that increases the amount of oxygen going through the engine also increases the amount of gas burned since the engine controller adds gas in proportion to the amount of oxygen it detects in the system. WAI reduces the amount of fuel burn by reducing the density of the air entering the engine and reduced air density contains a reduced amount of oxygen in it, producing a FE improving effect identical to that of driving at an higher altitude. A ram air intake increases the air pressure and density of the intake air, acting as a sort of mild super/turbocharger (without the engine load of the latter), and so would increase the fuel burn.

When hypermiling you spend most of your time at low throttle settings where the throttle plate is mostly closed and is by far the biggest intake restriction.
Compared to the throttle plate, other parts of the intake air path contribute little to the intake manifold losses when running at low throttle settings.
__________________
aerocivic.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009, 12:32 PM   #4 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
Ram air is definitely the way to go for FE. The more air you can stuff into the intake without consuming extra energy, the less work your engine will have to do breath in. Its pretty simple. Also the colder the air the better. Check out all the autospeed articles on the subject. This has been proven over and over again.

EDIT:
I'll cut and paste the articles here from the dead thread for easy access.


HAPPY READING
Eliminating Negative Boost - Part 1
http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_0629/article.html
Eliminating Negative Boost - Part 2
http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_0637/article.html
Eliminating Negative Boost - Part 3
http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_0646/article.html
Eliminating Negative Boost - Part 4
http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_0652/article.html
Eliminating Negative Boost - Part 5
http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_0663/article.html

Negative Boost Revisited, Part 1
http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_107824/article.html
Negative Boost Revisited, Part 2
http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_107825/article.html
Negative Boost Revisited, Part 3
http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_107826/article.html
Negative Boost Revisited, Part 4
http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_107827/article.html
Negative Boost Revisited, Part 5
http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_107828/article.html

Doing the Impossible
http://www.autospeed.com/A_109877/cms/article.html

Modifying the VL Turbo Intake
http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_0779/article.html

Into the Intake - Part 1
http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_1361/article.html

We Have a Record!
http://autospeed.com/cms/article.html?&A=109217[/QUOTE]

Ram Air Project
http://www.karlsnet.com/mopar/ramair.shtml

Last edited by tjts1; 06-12-2009 at 12:52 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009, 12:35 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
doviatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 388

Grey Goose (Retired) - '89 Geo Metro LSI 4 door hatch back
Last 3: 57.16 mpg (US)

Tweety - '91 Geo Metro Convertible -2 Door convertible LSI
Team Metro
90 day: 43.97 mpg (US)

Shadow - '02 Honda Shadow VT1100
90 day: 43.46 mpg (US)

Sonic - '07 Honda CBR1000RR
90 day: 42.69 mpg (US)

Filmore - '84 Volkswagen Vanagon
90 day: 20.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 47
Thanked 44 Times in 31 Posts
I sense a contradiction. ???
FE not power.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009, 12:42 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 356

Silver Turtle - '02 Ford Focus Zx3
90 day: 38.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
^I know, because the air is less warm it would be lower FE.

BUT because it lowers the pumping losses it would raise FE (and more than the cold air takes away) yielding a net increase in FE.

?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009, 12:46 PM   #7 (permalink)
Ex-lurker
 
i_am_socket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jersey
Posts: 571

Skeeter - '05 Toyota Corolla LE
90 day: 35.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Now, here's a question:

What if you warmed up a ram air intake? Could you warm up a ram air intake? You get warm dense air with more pressure?

Or is it simpler to just modify the throttle plate?
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009, 12:47 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
doviatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 388

Grey Goose (Retired) - '89 Geo Metro LSI 4 door hatch back
Last 3: 57.16 mpg (US)

Tweety - '91 Geo Metro Convertible -2 Door convertible LSI
Team Metro
90 day: 43.97 mpg (US)

Shadow - '02 Honda Shadow VT1100
90 day: 43.46 mpg (US)

Sonic - '07 Honda CBR1000RR
90 day: 42.69 mpg (US)

Filmore - '84 Volkswagen Vanagon
90 day: 20.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 47
Thanked 44 Times in 31 Posts
There are some good points here. I've got some reading to do on autospeed.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009, 12:53 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 356

Silver Turtle - '02 Ford Focus Zx3
90 day: 38.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by i_am_socket View Post
Now, here's a question:

What if you warmed up a ram air intake? Could you warm up a ram air intake? You get warm dense air with more pressure?

Or is it simpler to just modify the throttle plate?
That is where I was going with this. IF ram air helps, and WAI helps, then why not both?

Maybe construct a ram air of metal pipe and run the coolant hoses around it to heat it.

Now my question is, how much positive PSI acts on a car's front bumper at 60-65mph? Anybody know?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2009, 01:01 PM   #10 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
Ram air is not matter of PSI. The goal is to reduce the pressure loss that happens inside in the intake ahead of the throttle plate due to its geometry to zero. If you wanted warm RAM air you can just setup a very large intake behind the radiator. But you would be wasting your time.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comparing Warm Air Intakes (WAI) & Cold Air Intakes (CAI) toomuch EcoModding Central 23 05-26-2019 05:41 AM
Honda IACV explained TomO Off-Topic Tech 16 12-21-2015 01:49 AM
Hot Air intake vs. Cold Air... why or why not? Blister General Efficiency Discussion 3 10-09-2008 10:01 AM
Grill block affected milleage mar5ka Aerodynamics 24 08-31-2008 10:17 AM
Moving air intake into the engine compartment? pasadena_commut Aerodynamics 5 07-25-2008 03:24 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com