Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-09-2012, 09:03 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194

White Whale - '07 Dodge Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 37.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
It makes sense to me that, according to the report, the coolant itself didn't affect FE at all, whereas increasing the coolant temp did have a 3% improvement. So the coolant enabled a benefit, but didn't give a benefit directly. It would have been interesting to see what would have happened if they had run the conventional coolant at the higher temperature.

__________________
Diesel Dave

My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".

1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg

BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html


  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-10-2012, 05:34 PM   #12 (permalink)
Mechanical engineer
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,272

Siitin - '98 Seat Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 VolksWagen Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 104.94 mpg (US)

A8 luxury fuel sipper - '97 Audi A8 1.2 TDI 6 speed manual
90 day: 64.64 mpg (US)

Audi A4B6 Avant Niistäjä - '02 Audi A4b6 1.9tdi 96kW 3L
90 day: 54.57 mpg (US)

Tourekki - '04 VW Touareg 2.5TDI R5 6 speed manual
90 day: 32.98 mpg (US)

A2 1.4TDI - '03 Audi A2 1.4 TDI
90 day: 45.68 mpg (US)

A2 1.4 LPG - '02 Audi A2 1.4 (75hp)
90 day: 24.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 841 Times in 414 Posts
Modified Thermostat for higher MPG's... - TDIClub Forums

There is a long post on TDIclub on the topic. Gains come from no need for fan and frictions are lower with higher engine temperatures etc. You do need to make some modifications to get the gains from that stuff. I might test that evanscooling stuff this summer on my lupo...
__________________


https://www.linkedin.com/in/vesatiainen/

Vesa Tiainen innovation engineer and automotive enthusiast
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2013, 11:43 PM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Internet
Posts: 142
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vekke View Post
I might test that evanscooling stuff this summer on my lupo...
Did you?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2013, 02:31 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Phantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Independence, KY
Posts: 603

Blue Meanie - '02 Volkswagon Golf TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 48.52 mpg (US)

Wife's car - '05 WV Passat TDI

Rudy - '94 Chevy C2500
Thanks: 89
Thanked 47 Times in 44 Posts
I have thought of making my own evans from what I have found it is propalene glycol ~70% with 30% being ethaline glycol. they added the EG to thin it out so it is easier to pump when cold. The only reason that it "out performs water" is because water can boil on hot spots and the boiling prevents the coolant from touching the metal to remove more heat.
__________________
I move at the speed of awesome.


"It's not rocket surgery!" -MetroMPG
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2013, 02:52 PM   #15 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Internet
Posts: 142
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phantom View Post
I have thought of making my own evans from what I have found it is propalene glycol ~70% with 30% being ethaline glycol. they added the EG to thin it out so it is easier to pump when cold. The only reason that it "out performs water" is because water can boil on hot spots and the boiling prevents the coolant from touching the metal to remove more heat.
Yeah I had considered that too to make it myself but didn't want to find out the hard way that I didn't do the appropriate mix
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2013, 03:31 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
It is not easy finding thermostats that will allow exploiting the high boiling point of the glycol mixture.

You'd also have to temper down your heater/defroster temps. I have a 203 degree stat and the heater will burn your fingers and the defroster will crack the wiondshield in extreme conditions.
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2013, 03:35 PM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Internet
Posts: 142
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Dave View Post
It is not easy finding thermostats that will allow exploiting the high boiling point of the glycol mixture.

You'd also have to temper down your heater/defroster temps. I have a 203 degree stat and the heater will burn your fingers and the defroster will crack the wiondshield in extreme conditions.
Here's an interesting thread about 205F thermostats

Modified Thermostat for higher MPG's... - TDIClub Forums

As for the heater I just have as manual as it comes so I can adjust it whatever way I want.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2013, 04:33 PM   #18 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
I thought I would chime in on this. The biggest gain from running a higher temp thermostat is that the combustion gasses loose less energy to the cylinder walls and head, thus providing energy for the piston to extract to make the wheels go around. Having the cooling fan come on less is miniscule by comparison.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ConnClark For This Useful Post:
mikeyjd (03-25-2013)
Old 04-22-2013, 06:09 PM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Blue Angel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 190

Previous Car - '12 Chevrolet Cruze Eco MT
Team Chevy
90 day: 44.29 mpg (US)

535d XDrive - '16 BMW 535d M-Sport
Thanks: 17
Thanked 59 Times in 38 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
...the SAE paper projected a 2-4% FE increase with change from 190ºF to 215ºF thermostat, but didn't get it:

http://www.evanscooling.com/assets/p...vans-final.pdf
Actually, they got a nice 3% gain when raising the coolant temperature. Adding the coolant alone did nothing to improve economy, but when taking advantage of the coolant's higher boiling point and raising the operating temp to 215 the predicted efficiency gain was realized.

Also note that the cooling fans were locked "on" full time in both trucks to eliminate them as a variable. This probably had minimal effect on the outcome while traveling at high speeds/airflows, but in a city environment at lower speeds with stop and go thrown in, the potential for reduced fan on time could offer another advantage in efficiency.

Most people I see arguing against the Evans product hang their hat on the cooling capacity of pure water being much higher, but in reality most people run a 50/50 mix which has a much lower heat capacity than straight water, though still higher than Evans.

I'm very interested in this coolant. The only two things that hold me back from trying it are questions relating to performance with thermosyphoning tank style block heaters, and heater core performance in extreme cold. There's just not much information out there.
__________________
2016 BMW 535d
4100lb XDrive Eco-Yacht
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2013, 10:04 PM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
Good question, depends on where the mpg improvements comes from. Is it less effort for the water pump, power not needed for the electric or mechanical fan, is it allowing more aero mods or is a poorly cooled engine able to maintain and run advance vs retarded timing?

I use water wetter in my insight and I think it helps to run the grill block I do and maintain. For the hell of it I ran with a full block last summer and I got better mpg having the cooling fan run vs having enough air flow for it to maintain on its own.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com