Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-02-2018, 02:07 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Lake Worth, Florida
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What low rolling resistance tires for Ford Fusion Energi?

Hello everybody...

What low rolling resistance tires are best for my Ford Fusion Energi Titanium and where can I buy them?

Thanks for any replies.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-03-2018, 09:10 AM   #2 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 794
Thanks: 4
Thanked 388 Times in 237 Posts
If all you are interested in is fuel economy, stick with the OE tires (the ones that came on your car) IF they are still available. Usually OE tires are reverted back to their regular specs when the vehicle manufacturer no longer sources them, so it just may be that even though the tires are the same make and model, they may be different.

But if fuel economy is but one of your interests, you have to decide what compromise you are willing to make. There is a technological triangle involving fuel economy, traction, and tread wear. To get better performance in one area, one or both of the others has to be sacrificed. You need to chose which is most important.

Also, the term "LRR" means "better fuel economy compared to other tires with similar wear and traction characteristics." It does NOT mean an absolutely low rolling resistance value. So a tire labeled LRR might actual be worse for fuel economy than ones that aren't so labeled.
__________________
CapriRacer

Visit my website: www.BarrysTireTech.com
New Content every month!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CapriRacer For This Useful Post:
redpoint5 (08-03-2018)
Old 08-03-2018, 09:37 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,014

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 40.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,869
Thanked 2,513 Times in 1,553 Posts
While all true, the amount of sacrifice needed in wear and grip has decreased in recent years compared with improvements in rolling resistance.

OP, I believe your tire size is P225/50R17? I usually cross-shop TireRack and Amazon. TireRack lists a ton of options in your size:

https://www.tirerack.com/tires/TireS...earDiameter=17

The Ecopias are a good bet. Michelin Defender and Energy Saver are both well known LRR tires as well, and could be good options - which is not to say they're necessarily better than other LRR tires listed there, I just don't know about them.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2018, 10:21 AM   #4 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,882

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 500
Thanked 865 Times in 652 Posts
The lightest lowest LRR tires are the OEMs from the Gen I Chevy Volt

People love to diss them but they are both lighter and better rolling than any Michelin Energy, Continental or Ecopia.

Just make sure you keep them aired up 40psi+ or the fronts might blow a sidewall.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2018, 11:40 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 263

Winsight - '06 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 72.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 244
Thanked 86 Times in 61 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmay635703 View Post
The lightest lowest LRR tires are the OEMs from the Gen I Chevy Volt

People love to diss them but they are both lighter and better rolling than any Michelin Energy, Continental or Ecopia.

Just make sure you keep them aired up 40psi+ or the fronts might blow a sidewall.
I'll probably never find it again, but I read that they were the same tires used on the Cruze with less tread depth.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2018, 01:11 PM   #6 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,442

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,207
Thanked 4,388 Times in 3,362 Posts
BTW, very nice car Lesno. I'm always telling people on here the virtues of the Fusion hybrid, and you've got the ultimate. For people wanting a sedan, you can't do better.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2018, 04:14 PM   #7 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,882

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 500
Thanked 865 Times in 652 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusion210 View Post
I'll probably never find it again, but I read that they were the same tires used on the Cruze with less tread depth.
Let’s call that “misinformed “

The OEMs had a horizontally more narrow tread, but the depth was the same.

Tire rack usually lists 3 different Goodyear’s for the volt , the narrowist , lightest one is the true OEM but to be honest there isn’t much difference in RR between the 3 and the wider one is only about a lb more

Be up to the OP to decide if it’s worth it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2018, 04:22 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 263

Winsight - '06 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 72.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 244
Thanked 86 Times in 61 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmay635703 View Post
Let’s call that “misinformed “

The OEMs had a horizontally more narrow tread, but the depth was the same.

Tire rack usually lists 3 different Goodyear’s for the volt , the narrowist , lightest one is the true OEM but to be honest there isn’t much difference in RR between the 3 and the wider one is only about a lb more

Be up to the OP to decide if it’s worth it.
When I looked into it the tire name and size was the same but the Volt tire did have less depth. You can call it misinformed, but that was the case.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2018, 04:31 PM   #9 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,882

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 500
Thanked 865 Times in 652 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusion210 View Post
When I looked into it the tire name and size was the same but the Volt tire did have less depth. You can call it misinformed, but that was the case.
9/32” tread (OEM)

https://m.tirerack.com/tires/tires.j...t&autoModClar=


9/32” tread (replacement)
https://m.tirerack.com/tires/tires.j...t&autoModClar=


The tread width on the OEM is 6.5” but the replacements are over 8” width

And for the “less tire” they also charge you more , go figure.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com