Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

View Poll Results: Which of the following 3 is your top priority when selecting a new tire?
Low Rolling Resistance 6 85.71%
Treadwear 0 0%
Traction 1 14.29%
Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-28-2021, 07:56 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,096

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 39.72 mpg (US)

Oxygen Blue - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 58.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,907
Thanked 2,571 Times in 1,594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galvatron1 View Post
But I did just notice a sidewall failure at 8k in a Walmart review, concerning Michelin energy savers. Anyone else have sidewall failure here?

I used to go off-roading in my Insight occasionally, when I had two energy savers and two RE92s on the car. I broke a belt in one of the RE92s and the sidewall bubbled, but the energy savers eventually died from ~80,000 miles of treadwear.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
Galvatron1 (03-29-2021)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-28-2021, 09:32 AM   #12 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
Don't buy tires from walmart. They buy blems and scab made tires.
I bought my energy saver tires from tirerack dot com.

The energy saver tire inflated to 38psi showed no loss in range when I switched from warn out ecopia tires inflated to 44psi. Which is impressive because worn tires are your most efficient and new tires are least efficient.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
Galvatron1 (03-29-2021)
Old 03-29-2021, 06:03 AM   #13 (permalink)
Environmentalist
 
Galvatron1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: NYC
Posts: 74
Thanks: 136
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
Don't buy tires from walmart. They buy blems and scab made tires.
Does the same hold true for Costco tires?

Last edited by Galvatron1; 03-29-2021 at 05:02 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2021, 06:15 AM   #14 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
I don't know about cosco.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2021, 10:45 AM   #15 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,891

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 506
Thanked 867 Times in 654 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Galvatron1 View Post
Reddit mentions Michelin Energy Savers to be slippery, poor durability and prone to developing bubbles. Are they industry shills spreading rumors or are these legitimate problems?
with avid ascend GT?
No my Michelin LRRs have been terrible, great dry traction but terrible wear and one developed a bubble in the tread area
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rmay635703 For This Useful Post:
Galvatron1 (03-29-2021)
Old 03-29-2021, 05:05 PM   #16 (permalink)
Environmentalist
 
Galvatron1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: NYC
Posts: 74
Thanks: 136
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmay635703 View Post
No my Michelin LRRs have been terrible, great dry traction but terrible wear and one developed a bubble in the tread area
Ahh, thanks!! Which vehicle were they on? PSI? Driving style (hypermiler or spirited)? Tire size? Stock tires? Good wet driving?

Any significant difference in ohtsu tires RR & traction compared to Michelin Energy Savers, or does it not justify the price difference & am I better off just running ohtsu tires at 50 PSI?

Last edited by Galvatron1; 03-29-2021 at 08:37 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2021, 06:47 PM   #17 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
The energy savers are normally at least $150 each.
The Yokohama avid ascend GT tires are probably closer to $100. I say the energy savers aren't necessary on something that isn't electric only.
The Yokohama tires are better in every single way except rolling resistance and maybe tread wear, but with tread wear is should be pretty close between the 2.
If you run them at 50 psi they will wear out along the center of the tread by 40,000 to 50,000 miles. Only run them at max inflation when it's apparent that they will wear out on the shoulder, or if they are already fairly bald.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
Galvatron1 (03-29-2021)
Old 03-30-2021, 05:55 PM   #18 (permalink)
Environmentalist
 
Galvatron1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: NYC
Posts: 74
Thanks: 136
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
After all the snow last year & being next to hills impossible to climb in A/S, since I never bought new winter tires, I decided to check out LRR A/S with decent snow ratings.

I was surprised to see MICHELIN Cross Climate 2, which just came out, have the 3 peak snowflake & is Severe Snow Service Rated.

According to many YT reviews, including Engineering Explained, these A/S tires perform better than some winter tires! What sorcery is this, that everyone’s claiming this new tread pattern and compound allows it to have excellent LRR, tread wear and traction, including winter performance? I thought there were sacrifices that had to be made in the triangle? Is it possible this thing is a breakthrough? Sounds like an excellent question to ask of Capri Racer!

Also wonder if they’re superior to Nokian WRG4. Anyone here have Michelin Cross Climate 2, to share their triangle experience?

Just wanted to add how much I appreciate the ecomodder community. I hang on to every piece of great advice, so thank you!! On Reddit, hypermiling is heavily criticized and looked down upon & I feel alienated, outside of this community, & amongst varying opinions, & sometimes at a loss of words when defending hypermiling. Or as I like to say, hypersmiling. I did get a laugh on the thread reading about problems hypermilers face, so relatable to me, so thank you.

Last edited by Galvatron1; 03-30-2021 at 06:51 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Galvatron1 For This Useful Post:
Ecky (03-30-2021)
Old 03-30-2021, 07:11 PM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,096

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 39.72 mpg (US)

Oxygen Blue - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 58.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,907
Thanked 2,571 Times in 1,594 Posts
The Cross Climate 2 use a winter compound, and a very unique tread pattern that is supposed to prevent them from wearing rapidly during summer. I've never actually driven on them though.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
Galvatron1 (03-30-2021)
Old 03-30-2021, 09:14 PM   #20 (permalink)
Environmentalist
 
Galvatron1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: NYC
Posts: 74
Thanks: 136
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Is this the world’s 1st no compromise tire? If the tread life is good, I could get behind the idea of saving money by not having to swap winter/summer tires out twice a year. And a LRR tire to boot? This sounds too good to be true, what’s the catch?


Last edited by Galvatron1; 03-30-2021 at 09:19 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com