Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-16-2011, 06:43 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
The device adds more drag to the car than the power it makes. Much like a classmate of mine who designed an electric car with giant wind turbines on the back to supplement battery power. Neat idea, not applicable to our universe.

__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-16-2011, 07:04 PM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
HighMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: California
Posts: 145

Super Duty - '12 Ford F250 Super Duty XLT Long Bed Super-Cab
90 day: 15.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Why not just add some solar panels on the roof.
__________________

Good Bye Insight Hello 6.7 Diesel Truck!
**My First Hybrid Insight**
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2011, 08:05 PM   #13 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tortoise View Post
A grill block giving the same reduction of internal flow as the turbine will reduce power required more than the turbine would have produced. Unless the turbine is greater than 100% efficient. Give up on this one.
If the drag reduction is due to reduction of internal flow then any form of blockage inside the internal flow intake that reduces the flow the same amount will reduce the drag the same amount. The case is we have a required mass of air that must flow internally to cool the engine. The dynamic pressure of the air is not needed for the cooling. So if we convert some of that dynamic pressure into energy we are not preventing it from cooling the engine. Turbine efficiency never enters the equation. The argument that since your generating something its going to create more drag due to thermodynamics doesn't apply here. Your just utilizing a resource more effectively.


If you don't buy that in the 80's nasa put wing tip turbines on a piper aircraft and showed you could generate electricity while reducing drag.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	piper_wingtipturbine.JPG
Views:	42
Size:	18.4 KB
ID:	9444  
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2011, 08:15 PM   #14 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
At what cruise speed? (All in all I like the thread, thanks).
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2011, 08:16 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
CigaR007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 715

GreenTurtle (Retired) - '01 Toyota Echo Sedan
90 day: 44.85 mpg (US)

Zulu - '14 Honda CR-Z
90 day: 49.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 154
Thanked 272 Times in 166 Posts
Aren't there vortices being generated on wing tips (due to lift) ? If so, it would beneficial to tap into that unused energy for power generation. A very precise application, in my opinion, which would be hard to mimic on a car.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2011, 08:19 PM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
HighMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: California
Posts: 145

Super Duty - '12 Ford F250 Super Duty XLT Long Bed Super-Cab
90 day: 15.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 22
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowmover View Post
At what cruise speed? (All in all I like the thread, thanks).
faster then a car can go usually.lol
I am only kidding and I thought of this before also, just invent a better one that creates less drag and has very low inertia like 3" in diameter for a car but I like solar panels better and it's better use of the cars roof and it works even when you aren't moving. + for hybrid cars.
__________________

Good Bye Insight Hello 6.7 Diesel Truck!
**My First Hybrid Insight**
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2011, 08:25 PM   #17 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowmover View Post
At what cruise speed? (All in all I like the thread, thanks).
If I remember correctly when I read a report on it a few years ago it was something like 140 knots. But they did say that this test was by no means optimized, it was just the cheapest way to prove the concept. I'm sure it would work at lower speeds too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CigaR007 View Post
Aren't there vortices being generated on wing tips (due to lift) ? If so, it would beneficial to tap into that unused energy for power generation. A very precise application, in my opinion, which would be hard to mimic on a car.
Actually most cars generate a pair of vortices from the c pillar

see page 9 here

http://www.grandmarq.net/blaze/Blaze...of%20Autos.pdf
__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ConnClark For This Useful Post:
gone-ot (09-18-2011)
Old 09-16-2011, 11:01 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903

honda cb125 - '74 Honda CB 125 S1
90 day: 79.71 mpg (US)

green wedge - '81 Commuter Vehicles Inc. Commuti-Car

Blue VX - '93 Honda Civic VX
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
I can't find it right now, but the last time someone asked this question I found a calculator on the energy that you can get out of the wind at a given speed and for 55mph I think you could get about 200 watts out of a turbine that was about 2 feet across, so how do they get around 100 watts out of a little 6" turbine? they are going over 85mph! just like it's going to take signifagently more energy to go 85mph, you can also get more energy out of the wind when you are going that speed! just like you can get 3/4 more out of a 12mph wind then you can out of 11mph wind.
So a turbine like that might be able to run your LED running lights, but not much else unless you are going above the speed limit.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ryland For This Useful Post:
mcrews (09-26-2011)
Old 09-17-2011, 12:47 AM   #19 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
The "perpetual motion" thing pops up with some regularity.

Sure there is already internal drag through the engine compartment. I think a prop driven device would only add to it.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
mcrews (09-26-2011), NeilBlanchard (09-17-2011), Sven7 (09-17-2011)
Old 09-18-2011, 06:28 PM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConnClark View Post
If you don't buy that in the 80's nasa put wing tip turbines on a piper aircraft and showed you could generate electricity while reducing drag.
The basic squarish wingtip design of the day created vortices and was so inefficient that the wingtip pods bettered it so much, it still reduced drag despite the turbines.

Wingtip Vortex Turbine Investigation for Vortex Energy Recovery

The inefficiency was already built into the baseline vehicle.
This experiment won back some of that energy.

It's better to avoid the inefficiency to start with, rather than try to recover some of the wasted energy later.

__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com