Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

View Poll Results: Are wide tires better?
Great invention. 6 21.43%
Ok. 4 14.29%
OK for off road and racing. 10 35.71%
Make vehicles more expensive with no benifit. 8 28.57%
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-12-2011, 04:17 PM   #41 (permalink)
Blow stuff up
 
phunky.buddha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: DFW Metro, TX
Posts: 69

S2000 - '03 Honda S2000
Team Honda
90 day: 24.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO View Post
Tires "scrub" anytime you turn them, they don't have to be slipping. In fact a sliding tire is actually losing less energy as you are no longer changing the vehicles direction as much. Not that that is a smart way to take corners....
Yeah... because then you spend more energy trying to correct the slide. But sometimes that slide is fun.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
This is the main reason.
Except for a guy that left his CRX in my buddy's shop... had 27" tall tires on it. He thought they looked awesome, even though the tires had chewed the fenders completely apart. The random chrome plastic bits he had stuck all over the hood gave him enough horsepower to beat a Mustang Cobra too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thymeclock View Post
13" tires certainly cost a lot less than 16" or 17" tires do. Many of the people here are interested in saving money as a top priority. I am too, but I'm not willing to sacrifice good handling for it - which is why I won't buy narrow 80 series tires, no matter what small amount of fuel they supposedly save.
True. I'm tempted to build a CRX with 155/80-13 tires, but I'd much rather put 225/45-15s on it and try to see if I can still break 50mpg.

__________________
Intercrew Auto Salon
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-12-2011, 04:40 PM   #42 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
I'm surprised nobody around here has tried road bicycle tires yet.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 05:43 PM   #43 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thymeclock View Post
13" tires certainly cost a lot less than 16" or 17" tires do. Many of the people here are interested in saving money as a top priority. I am too, but I'm not willing to sacrifice good handling for it - which is why I won't buy narrow 80 series tires, no matter what small amount of fuel they supposedly save.
I put narrower tires on my Jeep Liberty - went from 225/75/16 to 215/85/16. Now I can run 55psi and the handling is no different; it sucked before and it still sucks.

And I have no idea if the mileage changed. If it did, the city certainly went down due to the increased tire weight although I can still get 30mpg on the highway.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 10:55 PM   #44 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 865
Thanks: 29
Thanked 111 Times in 83 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO View Post
I put narrower tires on my Jeep Liberty - went from 225/75/16 to 215/85/16. Now I can run 55psi and the handling is no different; it sucked before and it still sucks.
Your honesty is admirable. With the last statement, that pretty much sums it up.

BTW, the lousy handling is probably due to the nature of the vehicle itself.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com