08-21-2021, 12:14 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,759
Thanks: 8,168
Thanked 8,947 Times in 7,389 Posts
|
It's a start. You could plan it so it becomes the front support for a partial pan under the engine compartment and/or front wheelwell air curtains.
Everything depends on what's happening upstream, so working front to back is a reasonable strategy.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
08-21-2021, 01:08 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
Eco Rodder
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 105
Thanks: 25
Thanked 52 Times in 34 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
It's a start. You could plan it so it becomes the front support for a partial pan under the engine compartment and/or front wheelwell air curtains.
Everything depends on what's happening upstream, so working front to back is a reasonable strategy.
|
I had it on the lift recently and noticed a few things that would be (in my mind) problematic.
First off, the bottom of the front bumper is WAY above the front suspension. So the fist part of the belly pan would be pretty steep angle. The the catalytic converters hang down even with the bottom of the transmission pan. Beyond that the frame spreads out to the perimeter of the car.
I’m not saying it can’t be done but it would be tough. Had I thought of this when I had the body off, I could have added tabs, etc in strategic places.
__________________
Worlds highest MPG LFX V6 powered 1966 Chevelle
|
|
|
08-21-2021, 03:23 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,759
Thanks: 8,168
Thanked 8,947 Times in 7,389 Posts
|
IIRC a step is better than an angle.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
08-21-2021, 08:00 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 67-ls1
First off, the bottom of the front bumper is WAY above the front suspension.
|
Is the lower part of the suspension a lot below the air dam ?
Ideal would be to lower the airdam further to where the belly pan could be , and sideskirts down to belly pan level
Quote:
So the fist part of the belly pan would be pretty steep angle.
|
You'd scoop more air underneath, that's not so good
You want less air going underneath the car
A second stepped airdam in front of the suspension might work - and help retain some clearance- curved in planview, and pushing air out to the sides.
Quote:
The the catalytic converters hang down even with the bottom of the transmission pan.
|
You could fill in the voids with a partial belly pan, leaving the tranny pan, cats and mufflers as the lowest but uncovered parts
Put spats in front of the rear wheels
Airflow tends to be outward, angled aft, between front and rear wheels - where not blocked by side skirts
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to euromodder For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-25-2021, 12:31 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,327
Thanks: 24,448
Thanked 7,391 Times in 4,786 Posts
|
airdam
here's a link to CAR and DRIVER's 'Crisis Fighter Pinto' of March, 1974.
They wrapped their 'low' airdam all the way around to the front of the front tires.( at the elevation future rocker panel extensions would pick up, had they chosen to go deeper into drag reduction [ think Pontiac Firebird Trans Am ])
While they were at the nose, they blanked off any superfluous grille opening, and added Plexi headlight bubbles to give some radius.
Under the hood, they went from a 4-bladed cooling fan, to a 2-bladed. A thermostatically-controlled electric cooling fan, pusher, or puller, would be the ticket now. Above 40-mph ram-air essentially takes care of your cooling.
https://ecomodder.com/forum/member-a...vement-mpg.jpg
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
08-25-2021, 12:55 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Eco Rodder
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 105
Thanks: 25
Thanked 52 Times in 34 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
here's a link to CAR and DRIVER's 'Crisis Fighter Pinto' of March, 1974.
They wrapped their 'low' airdam all the way around to the front of the front tires.( at the elevation future rocker panel extensions would pick up, had they chosen to go deeper into drag reduction [ think Pontiac Firebird Trans Am ])
While they were at the nose, they blanked off any superfluous grille opening, and added Plexi headlight bubbles to give some radius.
Under the hood, they went from a 4-bladed cooling fan, to a 2-bladed. A thermostatically-controlled electric cooling fan, pusher, or puller, would be the ticket now. Above 40-mph ram-air essentially takes care of your cooling.
https://ecomodder.com/forum/member-a...vement-mpg.jpg
|
Very interesting article. I’ll have to look around and see if I can find the rest of it on the web.
My air dam is pretty low. It also seals the lower part of the radiator opening so everything that goes through the grill goes through the radiator.
I have zero cooling issues. I can be in stop and go for 15-20 min before the electric fan comes on and runs for less then 3 min. Then another 15-20 before it comes on again. Normal driving it never comes on. I wonder if I could/should reduce air through the radiator. Is there a fan on-fan off knee that one should shoot for?
I do have radial tires but they are wide. 8” rims with 9.5” tires in the front and 10” rims with 11.5” wide tires in the rear. Probably a lot of extra rolling resistance there. That was a conscious concession to my hot rodding past.
__________________
Worlds highest MPG LFX V6 powered 1966 Chevelle
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to 67-ls1 For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-25-2021, 01:04 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Eco Rodder
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 105
Thanks: 25
Thanked 52 Times in 34 Posts
|
Yikes! I found another small piece of the article. It show the mpg with the changes.
I would have thought a Pinto got better mpg before the mods
__________________
Worlds highest MPG LFX V6 powered 1966 Chevelle
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to 67-ls1 For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-25-2021, 01:45 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,327
Thanks: 24,448
Thanked 7,391 Times in 4,786 Posts
|
radiator porosity
Quote:
Originally Posted by 67-ls1
Very interesting article. I’ll have to look around and see if I can find the rest of it on the web.
My air dam is pretty low. It also seals the lower part of the radiator opening so everything that goes through the grill goes through the radiator.
I have zero cooling issues. I can be in stop and go for 15-20 min before the electric fan comes on and runs for less then 3 min. Then another 15-20 before it comes on again. Normal driving it never comes on. I wonder if I could/should reduce air through the radiator. Is there a fan on-fan off knee that one should shoot for?
I do have radial tires but they are wide. 8” rims with 9.5” tires in the front and 10” rims with 11.5” wide tires in the rear. Probably a lot of extra rolling resistance there. That was a conscious concession to my hot rodding past.
|
Seems like we've had dedicated threads about this. MPGUINO- controlled servos or such, operating some form of radiator shutters.
AEROCIVIC had a sideways guillotine air-valve, return-spring default opening, with cable-operated opening ) if memory serves me )
Current low-drag variants of passenger cars all seem to offer some type of grille-shutter technology.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
08-25-2021, 01:49 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,327
Thanks: 24,448
Thanked 7,391 Times in 4,786 Posts
|
Yikes!
Quote:
Originally Posted by 67-ls1
Yikes! I found another small piece of the article. It show the mpg with the changes.
I would have thought a Pinto got better mpg before the mods
|
No kidding!
My '67 El Camino, with 325-hp 396 -cid big block and slush-box got nearly as good a highway fuel economy.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
08-25-2021, 01:56 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
Somewhat crazed
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,437
Thanks: 542
Thanked 1,208 Times in 1,065 Posts
|
See aerohead calls them slush boxes, too!
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Piotrsko For This Useful Post:
|
|
|