Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-02-2012, 09:25 PM   #461 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 668 Times in 410 Posts
Thanks Smurf! I'm staying away from DSM's like they're meth, but I think a TDI will be in my future. Hopefully with a 3-Wheeler style fiberglass boat tail. Take my advice- when you start out, don't start with a 24mpg car like this. Buy something efficient like a Metro or Civic. Your gains will be that much more significant! I bought the Probe because it basically fell into my lap and it's a cool looking car. Nothing wrong with that, but not a great strategy for saving fuel.

Doing things "quickly" helps if you work outside for 6 hours a day messing around and have a large stack of free campaign signs like I did last summer.

------

I'll buy a Mk3 TDI before I build a Kammback over the rear window of this Probe. The visibility is too good now to spoil it and I don't have that kind of energy.

Priority aero wise, roughly, is:

-boat tail
-front skirts
-basjoos front
-wheel strakes

-buy something better

__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-09-2012, 08:41 PM   #462 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 668 Times in 410 Posts
I've been mulling over the boat tail for awhile, unsure of how to proceed. Well, after talking with my dad we came up with a solution. Trusses! Thanks Dad :wub:


Boat Tail Progress by Tyler Linner, on Flickr


Boat Tail Progress by Tyler Linner, on Flickr

I ran out of material today but it will be getting some cross bracing on the top and some hoops on the front end to guide the coroplast. I decided putting radii on the rear end would be too much trouble for how short/flat it is- any vortexes coming off the end shouldn't be too big.

The wake of the stock car is about 64"x32", or 2048 sq in. The new wake will be 36"x7", or 252 sq in.

That makes the new wake only 12.3% the area compared to stock. Should be good on gas!

Also done this week are some side mirrors. I haven't had side mirrors since last August but never had a problem with visibility. But for $2 a pop how could I resist? It'll be pretty hard to sneak up on this car.


Interior Rear View by Tyler Linner, on Flickr

And the grease in the wheels, Cab Calloway and Artie Shaw!


Good Music by Tyler Linner, on Flickr

Have to do some more wiring to get the side markers put in where the stock turn signals were, then extend the ground wires on the tail lights and mount those bad boys. Then to hook up my novel hatch latch solution.

One area of thought is a back-up aid since the boat tail will be completely and utterly out of sight from inside the car. There's an electronic distance sensor parking deal at Menards for $40 but I'm cheaper than that. I was thinking a simple orange fiberglass temp. fence post on a pivot. I could pull a cord inside the car, the small, 1/2" dia post would swing up and I could judge distance with that.

I've also been drooling over pitot tubes like those on airplanes to aid in effective slipstreaming, but have more research to do before I think too hard about it.
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sven7 For This Useful Post:
slowmover (09-30-2012), Weather Spotter (09-10-2012)
Old 09-09-2012, 08:45 PM   #463 (permalink)
Do more with less
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North Eastern Missouri
Posts: 930

OD - '05 Ford Econoline
90 day: 18.64 mpg (US)

Joetta - '86 Volkswagen Jetta Turbo Oil Burner
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 49.71 mpg (US)

Benzilla - '85 Mercedes Benz 300D
90 day: 28.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 177 Times in 112 Posts
How are you going to keep it from shaking side to side. Might be good to consider welding up a frame from steel. or at least bolting in some diagonals. I bet steel could be built as light.

BTW nice shape.
__________________
“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.” George Orwell

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe.

The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed.”

Noah Webster, 1787
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 09:59 PM   #464 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
2000neon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 596

VX - '94 Honda Civic VX
Team Honda
90 day: 47.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 133
Thanked 89 Times in 66 Posts
That's looking great so far, keep it up, I love this car.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 10:06 PM   #465 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 668 Times in 410 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Varn View Post
How are you going to keep it from shaking side to side. Might be good to consider welding up a frame from steel. or at least bolting in some diagonals. I bet steel could be built as light.

BTW nice shape.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven7 View Post
I ran out of material today but it will be getting some cross bracing on the top and some hoops on the front end to guide the coroplast.
It'll be attached underneath the ridge on each side of the hatch (where the tail light used to be) and across to the opposite side of the rear plate. There will be two, perhaps both angle bar, in a cross pattern. I held a piece in there today and it feels like it'll be super solid.


Quote:
Originally Posted by 2000neon View Post
That's looking great so far, keep it up, I love this car.
Thanks! It should be a fun week.
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store

Last edited by Sven7; 09-09-2012 at 10:12 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sven7 For This Useful Post:
Varn (09-09-2012)
Old 09-09-2012, 10:16 PM   #466 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Dig it !
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2012, 10:45 PM   #467 (permalink)
EcoModding Smurfer
 
Smurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: LaX
Posts: 293

Dime - '95 Chevy S10 LS ExtCab RWD
Pickups
90 day: 18.23 mpg (US)

G/A - '96 Pontiac Grand Am
Team Pontiac
90 day: 32.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 52
Thanked 35 Times in 29 Posts
Looking good! Couple questions:

By "wake" area, do you mean just the back surface of the car, or the rear glass as well? How is that calculated?

And with 12.3% of the original wake, any guesstimate on FE impact?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 12:30 PM   #468 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 668 Times in 410 Posts
Wake area (to me) is the area that has detached flow. Since the rear glass is peachy in my book, I took a tape measure to the rear end. Not very scientific but it's a good estimate.

I'm expecting 10% improvement, or about 4mpg. Combine that with 1mpg for the belly pan and 4mpg for E0 gas... calculations suggest 45+mpg without P&EOC? Perhaps 50 if I do a front end extension and full (to the rockers) front and rear skirts, and try really hard?
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 01:14 PM   #469 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,518

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,071
Thanked 6,961 Times in 3,605 Posts
10% improvement at what speed? Don't forget the % savings from aero mods increase as speed (aero load) increases.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 01:42 PM   #470 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 668 Times in 410 Posts
55mph. Mostly a guess, but 85% wake reduction's gotta count for something.

Is there a formula for drag reduction as a function of wake reduction? From that I could roughly estimate aero improvement and MPG improvement at 55.

It also matters how I drive. Steady at 60-65mph gets 35-38mpg. P&G, EOC and slipstreaming gets 41-45mpg.

I do value your opinion though, Darin. You've done this and so many other mods before, with testing. Seeing the structure, what do you think it'll get?

__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com