Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-06-2013, 01:36 PM   #181 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,959 Times in 3,603 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miller88 View Post
when the harmonic balancer wears out
Is that really a common problem? And wouldn't it be covered by the 10yr warranty?

Quote:
I think I like it more than the spark. For around the same price you do get more features (not important to me), but much better gas mileage!
I haven't seen a Spark up close yet (never mind driven one). Out of curiosity, I'd like to though.

For 2014 GM actually put the same CVT in the Spark that the Mirage uses (used a 4 speed slushbox before). It seriously raised the Spark's automatic EPA rating (30/39/34), but it's still not up to either the CVT Mirage (37/42/40) or the manual (34/42/37). (Heavier car, less efficient engine, worse aero.)

Quote:
0.28 is indeed pretty good for a car that short.
The Up is even shorter than the Mirage, I think.

Mirage gets a 0.27 rating in Japan and UK. But they also have a 1.0L engine option, and the size of the grille openings (fixed) on the Mirage vary depending on drivetrain combinations, with the biggest opening for the 1.2 CVT.

__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-06-2013, 01:57 PM   #182 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,585 Times in 1,553 Posts
Since when do harmonic balancers wear out??? I've never heard of any Metros with that problem (or any other cars for that matter).
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2013, 02:40 PM   #183 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Harmonic balancers are pretty robust as long as you dont let a front seal leak or coolant leak saturate the rubber part between the inner and outer iron parts of the balancer. When we found one that was bad we just put a used one on since it was easy to see if the rubber part had been oil (or coolant) contaminated.

I have seen them come apart, also seen them with the belts holding them together. You could pull the outer part off after removing the belts, made a h##$% of a racket.

I would tend to agree that they are a "life of the vehicle" part without contamination affecting them. You might wear one out in 400+K miles since there is some flesing that is absorbed by the rubber. V12 BMWs being inherintely balanced do not have a harmonic balancer. I have not worked on enough 3 cylinder cars to see if that number of cylinders would affect longevity.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2013, 10:46 AM   #184 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NY state
Posts: 501

XJ Cherokee - '00 Jeep Cherokee Sport
90 day: 12.96 mpg (US)

FoFO - '11 Ford Focus SE
90 day: 36.78 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 51 Times in 38 Posts
I4, V6, V8 engines usually have them for lifetime and it's pretty rare to have one wear out.

Who knows where Mitsubishi cut costs, though.

I like the little car. May consider one when the Focus starts to wear out.

Does the engine use a timing belt or chain? Belt is a deal killer.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2013, 08:53 AM   #185 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '11 Honda CBR250R
90 day: 105.14 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Honda Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Honda Fit Auto
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

PCX153 - '13 Honda PCX150
90 day: 104.48 mpg (US)

2015 Yamaha R3 - '15 Yamaha R3
90 day: 80.94 mpg (US)

Ninja650 - '19 Kawasaki Ninja 650
90 day: 72.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
There are some good numbers coming in on Fuelly for the Mirage where it is showing 42 mpgUS to the Spark's 37 and the Fiesta's 36.
.
Mitsubishi Mirage MPG Reports | Fuelly
.
Chevrolet Spark MPG Reports | Fuelly
.
Ford Fiesta MPG Reports | Fuelly
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sendler For This Useful Post:
MetroMPG (12-18-2013)
Old 12-08-2013, 03:46 PM   #186 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
The Up is even shorter than the Mirage, I think.
The up! is 17cm / almost 7" shorter than the Mirage.

Quote:
Mirage gets a 0.27 rating in Japan and UK. But they also have a 1.0L engine option, and the size of the grille openings (fixed) on the Mirage vary depending on drivetrain combinations, with the biggest opening for the 1.2 CVT.
Grille should be easy to fix
Wider wheels would also make a difference.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2013, 04:04 PM   #187 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,882

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 500
Thanked 865 Times in 652 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miller88 View Post
I4, V6, V8 engines usually have them for lifetime and it's pretty rare to have one wear out.

Who knows where Mitsubishi cut costs, though.

Does the engine use a timing belt or chain? Belt is a deal killer.
I have had plenty of harmonics go, our "bad" 6.2 diesel broke its crank after the harmonic flew apart at 200k.

Our 350 had a "pulley" off the bottom that drives the serpentine hammer and was also akin to a harmonic going (same location as the 6.2)

One of our old fords did this as well.

So I will say it depends on what they have the harmonic doing, if its integral to the serpentine pulley or fan drive it will go rather often, if its totally independant it will likely last just about forever.

Ours tended to blow a piece off and die catistrophically.

Yeah and I agree on timing belts, they really suck.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2013, 09:13 AM   #188 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NY state
Posts: 501

XJ Cherokee - '00 Jeep Cherokee Sport
90 day: 12.96 mpg (US)

FoFO - '11 Ford Focus SE
90 day: 36.78 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 51 Times in 38 Posts
I can't seem to find any definitive information whether it's a belt or chain.

I know of a few ford 3.0 Vulcan engines that had harmonic balance problems. Don't remember any of them breaking the crankshaft, but a lot of them did eat belts frequently.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2013, 09:48 AM   #189 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,959 Times in 3,603 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miller88 View Post
I can't seem to find any definitive information whether it's a belt or chain.
Does the Mirage 1.2L engine have chain or belt-driven camshafts?
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2013, 09:59 AM   #190 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NY state
Posts: 501

XJ Cherokee - '00 Jeep Cherokee Sport
90 day: 12.96 mpg (US)

FoFO - '11 Ford Focus SE
90 day: 36.78 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 51 Times in 38 Posts
Good! Belts are asinine. Saving $50 while manufacturing the car to end up costing the owner a $1000 service at whatever interval.

Of course, Chevrolaewoozuki cheaped out pretty bad on some of their engines and the belt tensioner pullies would break destroying the engine!

I'll take a timing chain rattle over having to do timing belts or risking one snapping on me!

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com