Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-03-2014, 11:45 AM   #1 (permalink)
Experienced UAW Mechanic
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Bear Lake
Posts: 363
Thanks: 7
Thanked 73 Times in 63 Posts
'83 RX-7 from <30 to 50+

So my S-10 progress is in the newb introductions part of this site, but yesterday I brought home a cherry '83 RX-7.
Those rotaries are supposed to average mid 20s at best, occasionally spiking to 30. But rotaries carbon-lock, and the cost of gaskets and apex seals exceeds the cost of a used piston engine.
So because my dad had a '96 Bonneville that did 35 MPG with the lockup torque converter not locking, I'm going with one of those engines. It's a 205-HP 3.8L V6, also found in '96-'02 Camaro / Firebird with manual transmissions.
I've talked to a PCM expert, this deal is good.
Classic V8s fit, so this swap will fit.
I see a smaller, lighter car with less drag than the "new" engine ever came in, and stock gearing for those cars gave as low as 1800 RPM at 65 MPH in the 'maro / 'bird, also known as the F-twins.
The five speed has a 0.72:1 OD, the 185/70R13 tires are 23.2" dia., and available axle ratios include 2.286:1, 2.412:1, 2.5625:1, 2.7333:1, 2.929:1, 3.077:1, and up into the mid-4s, because the RX-7 is getting a 7.5" rear axle from my '87 S-10, which is getting a Ford 8.8" rear axle.
I found a decent urethane airdam for $ 136 new, but that will have to wait until the car moves under its own power again. Today I unload it from the trailer, return the trailer, and begin pulling the rotary for disassembly.


Last edited by cosmick; 10-22-2014 at 06:48 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cosmick For This Useful Post:
Joggernot (10-04-2014)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-03-2014, 12:18 PM   #2 (permalink)
Experienced UAW Mechanic
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Bear Lake
Posts: 363
Thanks: 7
Thanked 73 Times in 63 Posts
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cosmick For This Useful Post:
Joggernot (10-04-2014), mikeyjd (04-25-2015)
Old 10-03-2014, 02:46 PM   #3 (permalink)
Experienced UAW Mechanic
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Bear Lake
Posts: 363
Thanks: 7
Thanked 73 Times in 63 Posts
Just ordered a set of 2.286:1 gears for $ 70 shipped.

Last edited by cosmick; 10-22-2014 at 06:49 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2014, 03:42 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
You could make one heck of a sleeper by supercharging that 3.8
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2014, 03:44 PM   #5 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Pretty, pretty car. It's going to be nice having one back on the road.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2014, 05:10 PM   #6 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 62.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
Subscribed! If you gear it up, it should return decent top gear cruising economy (at reasonable speeds).

Have you done the math -- what will the cruising RPM be at X mph with that tall gearing?
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2014, 06:21 PM   #7 (permalink)
Experienced UAW Mechanic
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Bear Lake
Posts: 363
Thanks: 7
Thanked 73 Times in 63 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
Subscribed! If you gear it up, it should return decent top gear cruising economy (at reasonable speeds).

Have you done the math -- what will the cruising RPM be at X mph with that tall gearing?
1540 RPM @ 65 MPH, with the 195/55R15 tires I just ordered, because 185/70R13s are getting extremely scarce, and for this odd lug pattern, the best solution for me, after hours of trying to scheme a cheaper alternative, was a new set of Konig 15x7s made for this car, at $ 102.50 ea. The tires are $ 50 ea. Those prices include shipping.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cosmick For This Useful Post:
MetroMPG (10-03-2014)
Old 10-03-2014, 06:22 PM   #8 (permalink)
Experienced UAW Mechanic
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Bear Lake
Posts: 363
Thanks: 7
Thanked 73 Times in 63 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Charlie View Post
Pretty, pretty car. It's going to be nice having one back on the road.
Thanks!
As for manual at 98% efficient versus automatic at 86%, the Mustang crowd proved that false on chassis dynos, and the LSx Camaro crowd re-proved it. Manuals are around 86% efficient, while autos are around 78%.

Last edited by cosmick; 10-03-2014 at 06:29 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2014, 06:27 PM   #9 (permalink)
Experienced UAW Mechanic
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Bear Lake
Posts: 363
Thanks: 7
Thanked 73 Times in 63 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ksa8907 View Post
You could make one heck of a sleeper by supercharging that 3.8
Rear turbo, in place of the muffler, was thought about. But the factory supercharged ones used very little boost on an engine with different heads because the blower forced relocation of the injectors, plus the pistons and pins were different, the rods probably, the block and crank maybe.
So I'm getting a common L36 instead of the rare L67, which is overpriced, and in high demand by the Fiero guys.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2014, 06:38 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
I raced a 79 RX7 in showroom Stock SCCA many yrs ago.
Had a 4bbl 5 speed.
It LOVED being downshifted!!!!!!!

__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com