Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-16-2009, 07:32 PM   #11 (permalink)
is not covered in bees.
 
Istas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Seeley Lake, Montana, USA
Posts: 207

Honda - '05 Honda Accord EX
90 day: 27.16 mpg (US)

Insight - '00 Honda Insight w A/C
90 day: 66.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 53
Thanked 51 Times in 26 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Istas
Nice looking grille block, both of you. Cool that it doesn't stick out like a sore thumb.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-18-2009, 06:47 PM   #12 (permalink)
Honda
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Rockies
Posts: 9
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
As far as the gearing issue, I know that there are lots of DX/LX/HX guys looking for the shorter geared EX transmissions. I'm sure you could have them do a straight swap for you.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2010, 10:14 AM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: 127.0.0.1
Posts: 31

Shiba's Tercel - '98 Toyota Tercel CE
90 day: 63.84 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfg83 View Post
Wonderboy -

I'm in *no* way an expert, but maybe the higher speed pushed you into your BSFC sweet spot. The higher speed cost you MPG, but the better BSFC spot was more fuel efficient, so it cancelled out and netted the same MPG.
NO WAY!! I had a feeling this may be the case in my car also (toyota tercel), but never wanted to post that, i just thought it was my mind playing tricks on me...or my MPGuino


Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
I can second that - a friend of mine got his best MPG on the highway (according to an SGII) in his 2-thousand-something CR-V at 62 MPH... intuitively, 55mph should have been better for him... but apparently, Honda did something "right" as far as making speeds efficient vs highway speed in that particular car.. (not model, just car.)

so, if i were to try and 'test' for this in my car, would i be looking for MPG at a certain MPH; or MPG at a certain RPM?

dont mean to thread-jack!!, its a very nice grill block!! i'm going to have to try and get around to a more permanent one like that, instead of the cardboard/duct tape one i fabed last weekend

~Shiba
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2010, 12:12 PM   #14 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
It took him about a month or two worth of fuel (2-3 tanks a week) of "testing" all highway driving at different cruise speeds. His was an automatic, so no real gear selection issues or anything there, he just found out that at ~62 (indicated), he got the best fuel economy, with a notable drop (~1mpg average) between ~62 and ~55, as well as between ~62 and ~65-67.

He did note, though, that if he were ever in a hurry to get to work, that ~73-75 was a "good compromise" between speed and efficiency... I can only assume that meant the fuel economy wasn't that much lower (2-3MPG, ~10%), and that the speed was high enough to make enough time to "forget" about the MPG loss.

Lest we forget, for some people, slowing down to get better MPG actually costs them more in the long run... If you make $30 an hour, and you're taking an extra half hour to get somewhere because you're going 5 MPH slower, you're losing $15 in wages... and gaining a few dollars in fuel (if that). In fiscal terms, the best fuel economy isn't always the best policy.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2010, 06:37 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
FastPlastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 419

98 Cherokee - '98 Jeep Cherokee
90 day: 17.18 mpg (US)

ZX7R Ninja - '99 Kawasaki ZX7R Ninja
90 day: 42.45 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
I'm glad to see more and more are picking up the stealthy mods. I feel the more the mods blend in, the more likely others will be willing to accept them as just another part of the car with an MPG bonus!
__________________

Adjusted for my driving habits. 80%city/20%Highway.
20mpg city/30mpg highway or bust! Check out my mods so far
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 09:15 AM   #16 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 433 Times in 283 Posts
For the record, I now have "normal" looking hubcaps - that are nearly moon-disc shaped with only a few little vents around the perimeter. Stealth!
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to PaleMelanesian For This Useful Post:
LibbyMetro (02-27-2013)
Old 05-17-2010, 02:04 PM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Wonderboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 674

The Fruit Bat - '01 Honda Insight
Last 3: 54.26 mpg (US)

Current - '21 Subaru Impreza Wagon
90 day: 34.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 40
Thanked 39 Times in 27 Posts
Quote:
I'm glad to see more and more are picking up the stealthy mods. I feel the more the mods blend in, the more likely others will be willing to accept them as just another part of the car with an MPG bonus!
I'm not even running with that clear upper grill block anymore. It ended up cracking, so I put some black coroplast on there shaped the same as the grill. Here's a picture of it at the AMEC run last november, but I don't normally run it with all that tape or those big air dams

I got over the mod "blending in" thing pretty quickly. If I kept my aero mods painted nice and black all the time (the black paint on the coroplast has peeled off a bit from removing that tape) I guess some could argue that it looks nice and blended or "cool", but I really don't care much. I'd go so far as to paint a mod the same color as the car instead of just leaving the coroplast white, but I'm all for getting noticed too and eventually making people wonder "why did he do that", after they probably think "what the flip is that idiot doing with that ugly-ass thing?". Beauty to me is something that is ugly or noticeably different in aesthetic to the status quo, but works significantly better with no other compromises.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Wonderboy For This Useful Post:
HyperMileQC (08-11-2012), j12piprius (03-11-2011), LibbyMetro (02-27-2013), Pawtuckett (02-27-2013)
Old 05-17-2010, 02:36 PM   #18 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 433 Times in 283 Posts
What thickness did you use, that ended up cracking? Mine is, if my memory is correct, 1/8" plexi. It's very stiff to bend even over the mild curve we have here.
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 03:14 PM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Wonderboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 674

The Fruit Bat - '01 Honda Insight
Last 3: 54.26 mpg (US)

Current - '21 Subaru Impreza Wagon
90 day: 34.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 40
Thanked 39 Times in 27 Posts
It was pretty bendy stuff, not too terribly rigid. It was my fault it cracked anyway. I wasn't careful when I drilled the mounting holes into it, and it cracked right then. It held up just fine for a while, but the crack slowly grew. I also didn't like that it slid around a little bit and you could see dirt and such building up behind it as it scratched away at the grill under it. I figured I'd nip any more scratching like that off at the bud since I do plan on selling the car.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2010, 04:38 PM   #20 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 433 Times in 283 Posts
Dirt building up behind it. I've got a collection of dead wasps behind mine right now. 5 of them got in there and died this spring!

__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OEM Grill Block for 92-95 Civic Owners TomO EcoModding Central 6 12-21-2014 09:58 PM
Lower Grill Block 2005 Honda Civic Arminius EcoModding Central 12 10-04-2011 12:31 AM
Airdam and grill block on the Mirage BrianAbington Aerodynamics 5 10-15-2008 06:54 PM
96-00 Civic Upper Grill Block Impulse Aerodynamics 2 07-12-2008 03:09 PM
2005 Civic Upper Grill Block Harpo Aerodynamics 13 03-17-2008 11:55 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com