Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-16-2012, 07:24 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
AndrzejM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Poland
Posts: 840

Berta - '97 BMW 318 tds Compact
90 day: 62.03 mpg (US)

Charlie - '07 Citroen C4 Grand Picasso Exclusive
90 day: 37.58 mpg (US)

Corsa - '05 Opel Corsa C
90 day: 53.22 mpg (US)

Mruczek - '03 Audi A2
90 day: 60.61 mpg (US)
Thanks: 185
Thanked 167 Times in 117 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChazInMT View Post
I'm not so sure a Kamm would help much without it being meticulously designed and built, and even then you might only get 5-7%. Reason I say that is your roof to rear glass transition area radius is freakin huge, there are papers done on this that show a big rear radius improves Cd a lot.
You don't need to design your kamm using rocket science just a common sense, aero template and remember to taper it to the back. And you can get good numbers from that Berta kamm coastdown test

__________________


Quote:
Gerhard Plattner: "The best attitude is to consider fuel saving a kind of sport. Everybody who has enough money for a strong car, can drive fast and hit the pedal. But saving fuel requires concentration, self-control and cleverness. It's a challenge with the nice effect of saving you money that you can use for other more important things."
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-16-2012, 08:49 AM   #12 (permalink)
Wiki Mod
 
Weather Spotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Midland MI, USA
Posts: 2,042

Max - '14 Ford C-Max SEL
Thanks: 228
Thanked 304 Times in 210 Posts
Grill blocks
Smooth wheel covers
Side mirror delete. I have had mine off for 2 years and the inside mirror works great!
Belly pan
Kamback. Leaving room for a boat tail ( you might not have space now but you will want one someday)
Take the tires right to max side wall.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 12:06 PM   #13 (permalink)
Aero Deshi
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065

MagMetalCivic - '04 Honda Civic Sedan EX
Last 3: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 430
Thanked 669 Times in 358 Posts
Different cars have different aero characteristics to begin with, Andrzej & Weather had cars ideally suited for a Kamm, there was essentially nothing aero about where the air left the backs of their cars. This Acura has quite a bit going for it in that the top of rear glass area has a large radius, and I've seen papers that show this is great for reducing the Cd. I'm not saying it's ideal, but, without knowing what the air is doing, a half-baked attempt to "Fill the Wake" in the case of this Acura CL will end up hurting the Cd. A very well executed Kamm going all the way back to the tail lights and having the sides shaped correctly would be the only way a Kamm would be an improvement on what is already a fairly aero car. The sides would be key to getting it right. We all know how to do the top part.

I pretty much gave up on making a Kamm for my Civic due to this reasoning.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ChazInMT For This Useful Post:
serialk11r (11-16-2012)
Old 11-16-2012, 12:41 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
2000neon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 596

VX - '94 Honda Civic VX
Team Honda
90 day: 47.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 133
Thanked 89 Times in 66 Posts
I think Chaz is right here. If nothing else the rear of the Acura is pretty different than the BMW, WS's matrix, the fiesta or even my Neon. All the basic stuff would still apply though as you said, especially for the top.

If you're thinking of a kammback, I would suggest leaving it towards the end and do the other mods first like air damn, grill block, etc. The time and effort involved in building an effective kammback could easily be spent other places first.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 01:25 PM   #15 (permalink)
Adventurist!
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 144

CLaero - '97 Acura CL Premium
90 day: 34.59 mpg (US)

CR-v - '03 Honda CR-V EX
Team Honda
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 21 Times in 21 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2000neon View Post
If you're thinking of a kammback, I would suggest leaving it towards the end and do the other mods first like air damn, grill block, etc. The time and effort involved in building an effective kammback could easily be spent other places first.
Good point. It is definitely time to do some front end mods, intake temps in the low 50s just isn't cutting it for FE, I had to P&G much more to maintain a reasonable average.

Anyone have a good reference for front nose cone designs?
__________________
'97 Acura CL 2.2L 5spd
'03 Honda CR-V 2.4L EX 4wd Auto
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2012, 06:10 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
AndrzejM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Poland
Posts: 840

Berta - '97 BMW 318 tds Compact
90 day: 62.03 mpg (US)

Charlie - '07 Citroen C4 Grand Picasso Exclusive
90 day: 37.58 mpg (US)

Corsa - '05 Opel Corsa C
90 day: 53.22 mpg (US)

Mruczek - '03 Audi A2
90 day: 60.61 mpg (US)
Thanks: 185
Thanked 167 Times in 117 Posts
I think there is definitely area for improvement at the back of the car

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	acura.jpg
Views:	112
Size:	77.9 KB
ID:	11899  
__________________


Quote:
Gerhard Plattner: "The best attitude is to consider fuel saving a kind of sport. Everybody who has enough money for a strong car, can drive fast and hit the pedal. But saving fuel requires concentration, self-control and cleverness. It's a challenge with the nice effect of saving you money that you can use for other more important things."
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AndrzejM For This Useful Post:
Cd (11-16-2012), Sven7 (11-16-2012)
Old 11-16-2012, 06:28 PM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
Nose cone may net you less improvement than the Kamm, actually. Block off those holes up front, get the wheels taken care of, then think about the rear end.

BUT BEFORE YOU DO ANY KAMM STUFF make sure you tuft test the rear window. If it has attached flow, as Chaz said, you may not even bother. It will not be ideal, but if it's there it may get you by. Depends how much you like to tinker.

For highway FE, I saw about 25% MPG increase without a boat tail, and 46% increase with one. With all we've mentioned in this thread you may be able to top ~35mpg on the highway at 60mph.
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store

Last edited by Sven7; 11-16-2012 at 06:34 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sven7 For This Useful Post:
Cd (11-16-2012)
Old 11-16-2012, 06:39 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
I saw a CL up close yesterday while walking on the street, I feel like the rear is probably slipperier than most cars out there...The sides taper in more than a lot of cars (especially from that time period), the rear window has some nice big radius turns on the C pillars and slightly tapers in. Maybe some tuft testing first to see how the air is behaving? Just eyeballing it I would suspect that the air reattaches at the end of the trunk.

I think CLs are extremely pretty cars, if it were me I'd go for areas that don't impact aesthetics first, especially since your mpg is not that bad to begin with. I would cover the bottom up and block the grille first. The rear bumper has a nice angle to begin with. You could also put some subtle fairings behind the rear wheels.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 09:57 AM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: kansas city, mo
Posts: 214

Pantry Boy Supreme (pbs) - '04 Volvo S80 T6 Premier
Thanks: 28
Thanked 46 Times in 26 Posts
looking at it now with the template, doesnt look bad as i thought. I didnt have much time to look before with my kamm response. Maybe a few inch extention to your spoiler could make a small improvement.

Agreed with others on buttoning up the front, and front/rear belly pans. haven't seen what it looks like under the boot area, but if like other hondas i've seen, its a parachute. still not as big as mine.

With your CL lowered, i assume you've also made a roll bar change, and aligned everything properly. How is your chamber?
__________________
__________________
"The test of the machine is the satisfaction it gives you. There isn't any other test. If the machine produces tranquility it's right. If it disturbs you it's wrong until either the machine or your mind is changed." Robert M Pirsig.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 10:29 AM   #20 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Indiana, US
Posts: 133

TheCav - '04 Chevy Cavalier LS
Thanks: 13
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
I would leave the spoiler as is. You could extend it or whatever but I dought it will be worth it. If anything just block off the gap between the spoiler and the trunk to help keep that pocket of air in place.

Go with the grill block, and wheel covers.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com