Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-11-2011, 07:18 PM   #21 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 231 Times in 160 Posts
JethroBodine,

Deep discharging a battery like that for prolonged periods will shorten its life. Keeping your battery voltage up near 14V will help keep the plates from sulfating.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-11-2011, 09:38 PM   #22 (permalink)
MPG Militia HMV-25E80+A
 
JethroBodine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vermont, USA
Posts: 823

FrankenJetta D - '90 Volkswagen Jetta GL
Boat tails and more mods
Diesel
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 64.35 mpg (US)
Thanks: 191
Thanked 144 Times in 98 Posts
Old battery, came with the car. Using it a test subject for use and abuse. I am going to get a deep cycle before winter. I carry jump pacs with me for emergencies.
__________________


Quote:
It is always very amusing how our imagination is put to the test when overcoming reality. Redyaris
Boat tail project
How to gently bump start during EOC
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 03:13 AM   #23 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,691

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,269
Thanked 721 Times in 458 Posts
I propose to move the discussion about alternator killing to one of the many related threads (for example: Automatic alternator cut out/regen braking), and use this thread only to post relevant info on increasing an alt's efficiency, as was the OP's intention.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2011, 12:00 PM   #24 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 231 Times in 160 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw View Post
I propose to move the discussion about alternator killing to one of the many related threads (for example: Automatic alternator cut out/regen braking), and use this thread only to post relevant info on increasing an alt's efficiency
Second the proposal. Same should apply to solar augmentation too.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2011, 04:59 PM   #25 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianjone5 View Post
My idea for an alternator modification is to replace the shaft pulley with an Air Con-type clutch/pulley. With a circuit sensing batter voltage, while the voltage is adequate, the clutch would allow the pulley on the alternator to spin freely. When the voltage reaches a pre-determined low, the clutch would kick in, turn the alternator and recharge the battery. You'd only spin the alternator when you needed to on long trips, and could top the battery at home via a trickle charger between trips.
My sense of this alternator mod is that it might not add much because an alternator that is not "on" spins fairly freely anyway, no?
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2011, 09:57 PM   #26 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 828
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConnClark View Post
I really like that modified bridge (figure 8.e). I played around extensively with controlling DC motors using PWM in college, but I never gave any thought to doing the same for an alternator.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2011, 10:25 PM   #27 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic View Post
My sense of this alternator mod is that it might not add much because an alternator that is not "on" spins fairly freely anyway, no?
Then how could someone who deletes an alternator see up to 10% mpg gain, as reported here?
A battery in normal use would be charged to replace the investment made in starting the car in a few minutes. You wouldn't see 10% mileage gain from that.

Brian
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2011, 12:30 AM   #28 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianjone5 View Post
Then how could someone who deletes an alternator see up to 10% mpg gain, as reported here?
Yup. That's a good question. I think the folks with the 10% gains were running the batteries down and then charging them through plugins, trickle chargers, and solar panels. The gain then might not be so much from taking the belt off as from not putting it back on to charge the battery and thus add that load to the engine. Take another look at MetroMPG's test: http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...8.html#post958. He tested with a disconnected belt without including recharging load. If somebody with an alternator kill switch wanted to test the difference between belt on (alternator off) and belt off and report the results, that would be one way to answer this, maybe. Or maybe someone can answer what sort of load an "off" alternator is really putting on an engine. I don't know.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2011, 02:04 AM   #29 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 828
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
I think this "10%" improvement is kind of misleading, given that MetroMPG started off with a FE of 71.2 MPG (or 3.3 L/100km).

I ran the numbers, and found that he saw a reduction in fuel consumption of 0.3 L/100km. Given his starting consumption of 3.3 L/100km, that is indeed a 10% improvement.

However, if I were to apply this same fuel consumption decrease to my own FE (last tankful was 20.5 MPG or 11.5 L/100km), I would find that I would only see a 3% improvement in fuel consumption.

Alternators do not take that much energy to spin. Noticeable, yes. However, will somebody currently seeing 25-30 MPG see a 10% improvement if they disconnected their alternator? Nope.

It's not to say that one should not look at improving the efficiency of the alternator (or removing it in favor of some other form of battery charging). For instance, if I again use my truck's performance as an example, I would find that I would pay roughly $2.65 per fillup for using my alternator. I would love to cut that figure down.

I'm only saying that one should not expect vast improvements from alternator modifications/deletions. Probably not a really good idea to utilize percentages when talking about FE improvements, either (at least if one is considering modifications that do not change the dimensionless coefficient C(d) ) . Heck, for that matter, it'd probably be better to talk about FE in terms of L/100km rather than MPG.

Last edited by t vago; 07-14-2011 at 09:51 AM.. Reason: a little clarification about using percentages while discussing C(d)
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to t vago For This Useful Post:
redpoint5 (05-16-2013)
Old 07-14-2011, 06:34 PM   #30 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 231 Times in 160 Posts
t vago,

I agree. I think we could quantify a percentage in the power required to spin the alternator to generate a given amount of electricity that the engine must produce. I have seen figures of 1HP per every 30A assuming a 55% efficiency of the alternator.

Watts / 745.7 (one HP) = Electrical HP Produced by the Alternator

30A X 14.0 = 420 W

420/ 745.7 = 0.563 HP electrical power

HP electrical power/ efficiency = HP mechanical


0.563 / 0.55 = 1.0236 HP mechanical

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com