Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-02-2016, 09:52 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 174

Silver Magnum - '03 Dodge Ram 1500 Laramie
90 day: 11.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Best way to get up to speed?

How should I be accelerating in my powerful vehicle? Should I try to keep the RPMs below converter stall (1700ish) and just allow it to kind of glide up to the speed limit or should I be bringing it up to TQ peak or perhaps allowing some boost to get it to speed very quickly?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-03-2016, 09:42 PM   #2 (permalink)
Intermediate EcoDriver
 
Mustang Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Northern Arizona - It's a DRY cold..
Posts: 671

Trigger - '07 Ford Mustang V6 Premium Coupe
Team Mustang
Sports Cars
90 day: 32.76 mpg (US)

Big Red (retired) - '89 Ford F-250 4wd Custom
90 day: 18.13 mpg (US)

Big Red II - '13 Ford F-150 FX4
Pickups
90 day: 19.61 mpg (US)
Thanks: 163
Thanked 129 Times in 102 Posts
It depends on the particular vehicle. Is your "powerful vehicle" 2WD or 4WD? 4WD vehicles normally get less MPG than 2WD vehicles. Generally, keeping RPM 2500 or below while accelerating at high engine load is beneficial. Wasting too much time accelerating is detrimental to fuel economy.
Quote:
...allowing some boost to get it to speed very quickly?
??? Until you install your planned supercharger, there is no "boost" on that vehicle.
My experience with hypermiling automatics has been very limited until recently. I purchased my 2013 F-150 4X4 on Mar 29. It has the 5.0 liter "Coyote" motor and 6R80 6-speed auto. From my experience with my Mustang, I limit acceleration RPM to 2000-2500. (most of the time) I also limit my speed to the posted speed limit. My tires on both vehicles are at sidewall max. (50 PSI)
Your mileage may vary.

And don't consider EVERY stoplight to be a "Christmas tree".
__________________
Fuel economy is nice, but sometimes I just gotta put the spurs to my pony!



Quote:
Originally Posted by thatguitarguy View Post
Just 'cuz you can't do it, don't mean it can't be done...
Quote:
Originally Posted by elhigh View Post
The presence of traffic is the single most complicating factor of hypermiling. I know what I'm going to do, it's contending with whatever the hell all these other people are going to do that makes things hard.

Last edited by Mustang Dave; 05-03-2016 at 10:37 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2016, 10:26 PM   #3 (permalink)
Hydrogen > EV
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NW Ohio, United States
Posts: 2,022

Silver Flea - '05 Honda Insight
90 day: 58.96 mpg (US)
Thanks: 992
Thanked 396 Times in 283 Posts
This is all MY observation, and not very scientific....sorry lol

In traffic, I can turn onto a road and basically 1st to 4k RPM, 2nd to 4k, and then 6th and I am cruising at 45-60 MPG (depending on vehicle and environment temperatures).

With no traffic, I go 80% engine load, and shift around 1750 RPM. Maybe 2k+ and skip shift.

If I don't have anywhere to be (and I've gotten the first method out of my system lol) I take 1st to 6 MPH, 2nd to 11 MPH, 3rd to 20 MPH, 4th to 25 MPH, 5th to 30 MPH, then 6th I keep at MPG of 30+ MPG. Slow, but the best way.

(Cough cough, Redneck) Lately, I have been able to accelerate at 40+ MPG on a flat [road] when going 35 MPH +.

So, I'm really no help at all. I'm not an auto, and I have no conclusive information, and my data is basically "don't do it too slowly, unless you go super slow."

But I hope you learned the REAL lesson. Every vehicle and situation is different, you'll have to experiment and monitor your vehicle to find what works best for you
__________________





Best Tanks:
Mustang - 54.83 mpg (US) at the Green Grand Prix
Insight - 82.91966 mpg (US) over 818.5 miles.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2016, 04:34 AM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Jack-Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 126

Partygurke - '90 VW Polo 2F
TEAM VW AUDI Group

Rodi - '04 Smart Roadster Coupe
Thanks: 2
Thanked 63 Times in 41 Posts
Hi,
i accelerate between 2000-4000rpm with about 90% of the max torque. I "delete" the wide open throttle enrichment with a screw under the pedal.. Not optimal, but better then the enrichment with full opened throttle.

I starting with the first gear without a great acceleration, shift to the second, accelerate to 3500-4000rpm, shift to the 5. gear.

I drive a VW Polo 86C with 1.3l gasoline engine
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2016, 10:11 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
let apologize up front......

'best way to get up to speed?'

"start at the top of the hill....."

ok, I got that out of my system.....
__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mcrews For This Useful Post:
Fat Charlie (05-04-2016)
Old 05-05-2016, 07:56 AM   #6 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
Establish best habits. 80-90% of "absolute best" as a habit is worth than inconsistency.

Consistency. Drive fewer miles, overall, in the course of a year to accomplish the same ends (is more important).

Drive the fewer miles at a higher skill level. But do it on a consistent basis. What feels comfortable. But is proven better by your records to have positive impact on reducing your annual fuel bill.

If you don't know that number, it is where to start. How to accelerate is too small a detail to matter, at the beginning.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to slowmover For This Useful Post:
Fat Charlie (05-06-2016), JRMichler (05-06-2016)
Old 05-05-2016, 10:33 PM   #7 (permalink)
Intermediate EcoDriver
 
Mustang Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Northern Arizona - It's a DRY cold..
Posts: 671

Trigger - '07 Ford Mustang V6 Premium Coupe
Team Mustang
Sports Cars
90 day: 32.76 mpg (US)

Big Red (retired) - '89 Ford F-250 4wd Custom
90 day: 18.13 mpg (US)

Big Red II - '13 Ford F-150 FX4
Pickups
90 day: 19.61 mpg (US)
Thanks: 163
Thanked 129 Times in 102 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowmover View Post
... How to accelerate is too small a detail to matter, at the beginning.
Excellent point! After years of adjusting my driving techniques for fuel economy, acceleration technique is insignificant in the grand scheme. In my (documented) experience (see my fuel log), having fun versus "putting a raw egg on the accelerator pedal" really doesn't make a significant difference in average fuel economy.
__________________
Fuel economy is nice, but sometimes I just gotta put the spurs to my pony!



Quote:
Originally Posted by thatguitarguy View Post
Just 'cuz you can't do it, don't mean it can't be done...
Quote:
Originally Posted by elhigh View Post
The presence of traffic is the single most complicating factor of hypermiling. I know what I'm going to do, it's contending with whatever the hell all these other people are going to do that makes things hard.

Last edited by Mustang Dave; 05-05-2016 at 10:43 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 12:22 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowmover View Post
Establish best habits. 80-90% of "absolute best" as a habit is worth than inconsistency.

Consistency. Drive fewer miles, overall, in the course of a year to accomplish the same ends (is more important).

Drive the fewer miles at a higher skill level. But do it on a consistent basis. What feels comfortable. But is proven better by your records to have positive impact on reducing your annual fuel bill.

If you don't know that number, it is where to start. How to accelerate is too small a detail to matter, at the beginning.
Well said!!!! and true.
__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 01:11 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,013

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 41.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 466 Times in 287 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowmover View Post
How to accelerate is too small a detail to matter, at the beginning.
Very true. I did some comparative testing and found that "normal" vs "drive like a grandma" acceleration made almost no difference to gas mileage. So I accelerate at about 3/4 throttle, shift at 2500 RPM, and keep up with traffic.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JRMichler For This Useful Post:
Joggernot (05-07-2016)
Old 05-07-2016, 08:44 AM   #10 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
If I drive, on average, 12,000 miles/yr, then the cost (let's measure in gallons versus dollars) on an annual basis can be related to other costs more easily; that of depreciation, finance, insurance and the rest. These need to be expressed as a cost per mile. Cents per mile.

This is the big picture.

Sure, reducing fuel cost is advantageous. But most Americans do no more than factor monthly payment and weekly fuel cost. Have to break free of this

DHS released a study a few years back which revealed, generally, that 90% of us drive to 90% of the same places 90% of the time. Work, grocery store, library, post office, etc. So, this is where to begin. A better route to the office even if it is longer. No idling. Etc.

Same for errands. Combine them to one Saturday morning trip, as an example, and then use "Best Order Routing" to go to the farthest point first (by freeway, preferably) and work back to the house in a loop which features no left turns, etc. As does UPS or FedEx. Cut the miles and cut especially the number of cold starts. Eliminate the convenience store runs altogether.

Once on the better route -- to work or errand running -- find the legal speed which best fits never having to stop. This is the heavy vehicle penalty. The more one uses a route and familiarization kicks in, questions like how to accelerate fit themselves in.

One "wins" at the FE game, IMO, when one reduces cold starts, total miles to achieve exact same ends, and has reduced CPM annual cost. It's the percentage gain to the bottom line, annually, that matters.

My near 8000-lb pickup truck is different than yours. But I took the challenge from a fellow owner here that the discrepancy between highway and city numbers was a bit false. It is explained almost as much by my driving (the big picture above) as it is by non steady state operation.

I applied the above and saw a 22% increase over an 1100 mile period. Understand that I was already driving in manner appropriate to FE. Most would be very happy with the city number I had already achieved. Same for highway.

Comparisons to others need first be filtered by truck spec, climate and terrain. And only then to driver motivation. As you can see it's hard to do. Most never get this basis. And focus on a number which may have little to do with their particulars.

Start by keeping records. It's the only approach that works. On paper or online. Takes about 5000-miles to come up with a decent average, and only past four seasons can one be accurate. Questions like how to fill the gas tank or how to accelerate really don't matter.

Making sure -- verifying -- that mechanical systems are in ideal shape is the best first step, IMO. Book maintenance with service periods reduced by 10% is a suggested start. Get ahead on this. Alignment, brake drag, steering slop, etc need to be examined. Even brand new.

The use of the block heater year round is another. Especially for a work commuter. Same for a winter front, gas or diesel.

Tires and steering are the big ones on a pickup truck. Best choice of the former genuinely pays. No other mods really do. No free lunch, in other words.

I start by weighing the truck. CAT Scale. All four corners. The heaviest individual position determines the minimum per axle. Driver, max fuel plus usual tools and gear aboard. Then I work with tire pressures. I very strongly disagree with tire pressure bumped way up. Pickups don't need to be even more rollover prone than they already are. The minimum plus 5 is a decent place to start. (Probably, to stop). Inside the vehicle manufacturers door sticker range.

I also favor better shock absorbers (KONI first, Bilstein second). Poly antiroll bar bushings. I equipped my one ton with a rear bar where none was present, and had to upsize the front to maintain balance. (Fred Puhns book on handling a basic). Tires already last me over 100k as do brakes. Better handling means easier to handle curves and turns, but not at the expense of tire or brake life (as these are EQUALLY important as fuel mileage).

Greatest amount of work for highest miles at lowest cost with highest reliability, is pretty much my mantra. FE is but one measure.

Were I in your shoes I would start my record keeping by finding the average mph of the truck. Engine hours divided into total miles. Below 27 is unacceptable. Period. If one can get this number higher, then one is set on the right road. THIS is how I took my four ton truck to 23-mpg in the city for that 1100-mile period. All of the above had to come together to make it happen.

Good luck.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com