Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-03-2014, 01:49 PM   #121 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,908

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,952 Times in 1,845 Posts
All else being equal, a large(r) diameter narrower tire will have lower rolling resistance and lower aero drag than a small(er) diameter wider tire.

One reason is that a larger diameter tire will 'bridge' across unevenness of the road better. Another is that since a tire is essentially 'wedging' the weight of the car uphill constantly - a larger diameter tire has a mechanical advantage, because the 'wedge' it provides is a lower angle.

__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-12-2014, 10:55 PM   #122 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,908

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,952 Times in 1,845 Posts
The Bridgestone Ecopia EP500's are for sale!

BRIDGESTONE® ECOPIA EP500 Tires | Summer Eco Tire for Cars

A bit over $137 each. Now if we can find a source of steel wheels to fit this tire.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/

Last edited by NeilBlanchard; 06-13-2014 at 01:52 PM.. Reason: typo
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NeilBlanchard For This Useful Post:
freebeard (06-13-2014)
Old 06-13-2014, 12:09 AM   #123 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,891

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 506
Thanked 867 Times in 654 Posts
I have seen 16" space savers but never 19"

Too bad they won't offer them for antiques in say 125/80r13 or 14 or 15

Then I could use them today!
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2014, 03:11 AM   #124 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,699
Thanks: 8,145
Thanked 8,925 Times in 7,368 Posts
You can get 125-15s today —

CALL US (815) 895-0244 Product List - 125-15 Tires

Quote:
125R15 Firestone F560 Blackwall Low cost replacement tire for many European cars Great for front-runners on your classic rod Construction Tubeless Poly/Steel Load Capacity 695 @ 44 psi Overall Diameter 23.00" Tread Width 3.75"
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2014, 02:22 PM   #125 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 132

The Rental - '13 Hyundai i30
90 day: 37.55 mpg (US)

Autocross - '04 Ford Focus ZX3
90 day: 24.76 mpg (US)

The Wifes - '02 Ford Focus SVT
90 day: 23.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 48 Times in 38 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard View Post
All else being equal, a large(r) diameter narrower tire will have lower rolling resistance and lower aero drag than a small(er) diameter wider tire.

One reason is that a larger diameter tire will 'bridge' across unevenness of the road better. Another is that since a tire is essentially 'wedging' the weight of the car uphill constantly - a larger diameter tire has a mechanical advantage, because the 'wedge' it provides is a lower angle.
just noticed this post.

a larger diameter tire actually has worse mechanical advantage when driving over a bump. the lever arm is longer, so it take more torque to do the work.
i'm not sure all the math, but my physics professor did this exact example in class once, and I've remembered it to this day.
__________________





  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2014, 02:31 PM   #126 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,891

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 506
Thanked 867 Times in 654 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thenorm View Post
just noticed this post.

a larger diameter tire actually has worse mechanical advantage when driving over a bump. the lever arm is longer, so it take more torque to do the work.
i'm not sure all the math, but my physics professor did this exact example in class once, and I've remembered it to this day.
No, you are mixing up the reference point, your cars motor is not driving you up the crack the weight of the car rolling along does.

So yes a larger tire will roll more easily over a crack when being "pushed" than a smaller tire.

Try pushing a hand cart with small tires over uneven terraign and then one with larger and you will see what he is talking about.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rmay635703 For This Useful Post:
NeilBlanchard (06-15-2014)
Old 06-13-2014, 02:40 PM   #127 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 132

The Rental - '13 Hyundai i30
90 day: 37.55 mpg (US)

Autocross - '04 Ford Focus ZX3
90 day: 24.76 mpg (US)

The Wifes - '02 Ford Focus SVT
90 day: 23.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 48 Times in 38 Posts
theres 2 point hes making.

bridging the crack, which i didn't dispute, and wedging the tire uphill (or over an obstacle) where a specific mention to mechanical advantage was made.
__________________





  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2014, 11:07 PM   #128 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,891

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 506
Thanked 867 Times in 654 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thenorm View Post
twedging the tire uphill (or over an obstacle) where a specific mention to mechanical advantage was made.
Again you are focusing on something that has no bearing on the conversation.
Go by what he meant not what he said, an unpowered larger wheel has a larger mechanical advantage over a small one (think about a push cart).

When my car goes over a bump it wastes energy in the suspension and also slows the forward momentum of the car.

The larger the tire the easier it is to roll over obstacles whether they are bumps or cracks. The impulse duration is short so it is the horizontal movement of the car that pushes you over not the motor so the torque to the halfshaft is meaningless.

I know this because again push carts with bigger wheels are indeed easier to roll up door ledges and cracks in the sidewalk than small tires which sometimes require me to perform a vertical lift on the load to get over them.

So although a larger tire has absolutely no benefit in terms of the torque required to spin it, it definately has advantages in being less affected by changes in elevation due to the angle of approach of the tire surface itself.

The more gradual angle of the tire spreads the bump out over a longer duration and due to the dynamic nature of the rubber flexing it also results in less elevation change (compared to a smaller tire) Also a larger diameter tire flexes less when hitting an obstacle and the flexion of a larger tire is in a more favorable angle so less force gets directed opposite of the direction of travel in the form of vibration.

(I would almost bet there is some sort of illistrated video showing what a tire does when it tries to roll over a bump in slow mo so you can see the deflection in the tire)

So there is more to this and my only interest in the tire would be from the materials it is made of, not so much the size since it doesn't fit my cars. (with a wierd rim it could fit my old diesel suburban though (barely)

Has anyone determined what the weight ratings of these tires are? What are the inflation pressures?

Also I notice BMWs do occasionally come with 19" space savers, if we could find other cars like this and make a list, there might be hope of finding one in a junkyard with the correct lug pattern.

And no I won't hold my breath for I3 rims.

Cheers
Ryan
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rmay635703 For This Useful Post:
NeilBlanchard (06-15-2014), UltArc (06-14-2014)
Old 06-14-2014, 12:53 AM   #129 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,699
Thanks: 8,145
Thanked 8,925 Times in 7,368 Posts
Quote:
Go by what he meant not what he said...
"Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?"

Quote:
(with a wierd rim it could fit my old diesel suburban though (barely) Has anyone determined what the weight ratings of these tires are? What are the inflation pressures?
It would take 8 of them to hold up a Suburban; they're for the BMW i3.

Quote:
03-12-2013, 03:17 PM #23 (permalink)
rmay635703

I still rather have 155/90 r12/13/14 or 15
You were in the thread in March, have you followed along since? All this back and forth about bumps and energy absorbed by the suspension ignores the fact that a key design feature is using a high-profile aspect ratio so higher pressures can be run.

Centerline can make a wheel in any diameter, offset and bolt pattern you require. All the 19x4s have long since left the junkyards, try swap meets.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2014, 07:14 AM   #130 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 126

Champagne - '13 Chevy Cruze 1LT
90 day: 33.35 mpg (US)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 23 Times in 20 Posts
I just came across this posting. I wonder where you could buy aftermarket rims that would; A) Work with these tires, and B) work with your vehicle. If anyone could answer this I would appreciate it because the only high load bearing rim I can think of right off hand would be trailer rims.

__________________

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com