Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Off-Topic > The Lounge
Register Now
 Register Now
 


View Poll Results: Should the speed limit be lowered to save fuel?
Yes, speed limit should be lowered nationally. 36 43.37%
No, the public would be unhappy. 47 56.63%
Voters: 83. You may not vote on this poll

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-15-2008, 11:45 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 9

Nice Timing - '97 Honduh Civic DX
90 day: 38.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Change Speed Limit?

For my business ethics class I'm writing a persuasive essay, the topic:
"Should the speed limit on highways and interstates be reduced to save fuel? If so, to what speed?"

Right now I'm researching articles on the topic, but haven't had too much luck finding detailed magazine, newspaper or scholarly articles.

Do any of you have favorite articles or know where I could find some? Any help and or links are appreicated and I'll be sure to post the paper up when it is completed! TIA

Below are two that I've found so far:

http://proxy.mul.missouri.edu:2595/c...=hitlist&num=3

http://proxy.mul.missouri.edu:2228/u...=11063&docNo=1


Last edited by Supa; 09-15-2008 at 11:54 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-16-2008, 12:04 AM   #2 (permalink)
EcoMod Wannabe
 
Sean T.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lake Orion, MI
Posts: 448

Taurusaurus Rex - '97 Ford Taurus GL (Sedan)
90 day: 19.39 mpg (US)

Blue Wagon - '00 Ford Taurus Wagon SE Comfort
90 day: 19.61 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 16 Times in 9 Posts
Unfortunately, I regretfully say that I voted no... simply because I (and you all probably do too) have those days where you are running late, and you NEED that 70 mph speed limit... when fuel efficiency drops to the #2 concern, behind getting to school or work on time.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 12:05 AM   #3 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,761

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,546 Times in 2,215 Posts
I don't.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 12:08 AM   #4 (permalink)
EcoMod Wannabe
 
Sean T.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lake Orion, MI
Posts: 448

Taurusaurus Rex - '97 Ford Taurus GL (Sedan)
90 day: 19.39 mpg (US)

Blue Wagon - '00 Ford Taurus Wagon SE Comfort
90 day: 19.61 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 16 Times in 9 Posts
well, I do admit that I suck at time management.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 12:32 AM   #5 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,761

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,546 Times in 2,215 Posts
Curious- how far is your trip and how much time difference is there between doing it at 55 vs 70?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 12:57 AM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Hasbro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Marana, AZ
Posts: 84
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Absolutely not. Conserving is a choice. If people want to drive fast it should be their right. I'd rather see $10 a gallon than have more control pushed on me.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 01:59 AM   #7 (permalink)
Depends on the Day
 
RH77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,761

Teggy - '98 Acura Integra LS
Sports Cars
90 day: 32.74 mpg (US)

IMA - '10 Honda Insight EX
Team Honda
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)

Tessie - '06 Acura TSX Base
90 day: 28.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 41 Times in 35 Posts
I voted Yes.

Currently, it's essentially up to each state to determine their own limits. I've driven in some states with a 75 mph limit. That translates to 81 mph (6-over rule) as a comfortable max speed vs. a ticket. This just sucks down the fuel.

If it were to be implemented, it would have to be phased-in, using 5-mph increments. 75 to 70. 70 to 65. The ideal max, IMO, would likely be 60.

Then you have to ramp-up enforcement -- some States are running thin on funding in this department. Most of the public would be outraged, but like most laws, it's for the good of the people.

Refer to the gas crunch of the 70's as a guide, and the resulting 55mph limit. I chose 60 because of a higher average Cd of the driving fleet in this era. It's the simple Physics of aerodynamics at high speeds and fuel consumption. Then employ a Patriotic campaign.

Then, either loosen the taxes on diesel, or keep big-rigs at the same limit. Cheaper fuel = 5 mph less than passenger cars.

Then realize that it won't happen any time soon. Big Oil and other lobbies won't let it happen. The public outcry would be tremendous.

Sammy Hagar would record albums again...

RH77
__________________
“If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research” ― Albert Einstein

_
_
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 03:04 AM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 34

KickmeintheJimmy - '96 GMC Jimmy 4 Door 4WD
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sure in combination with a no drive through service law to stop useless idling (side effects? 88% of the country saves more money and loses weight which also drops are medical expenses.) Gee it's a toughy
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 06:37 AM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London, UK
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
IMHO lowering the speed limit is not the solution. Speed limits are for safety, and low fuel consumption should be a technical matter. More fuel is wasted in gridlocks at the entrance of cities than on open roads. Cars are generally more efficient on cross country than in the city, therefore it is the technological advancement, electric car perhaps, that is the long term solution. Not another restrain.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 07:13 AM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Funny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 409

Eco-Fit - '13 Honda Fit Base
90 day: 37.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 30
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hasbro View Post
Absolutely not. Conserving is a choice. If people want to drive fast it should be their right. I'd rather see $10 a gallon than have more control pushed on me.
I voted No also, not because I want to see people speeding down the highway, but because the government has enough control over us already. Why give them more power? Sure you save a TON of fuel, but there are idiots that won't follow the newly enacted limit and they'll kill the hypermiler in the slow lane by rear ending him.

__________________
American by right
Ecomodder by choice
Hypermiler by necessity

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
News: Utah Considers Joining 80 MPH Speed Limit Club MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 68 11-04-2009 07:25 PM
News: Switzerland cutting speed limits to reduce emissions MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 7 09-18-2008 12:02 PM
Field Weakening Experiment for Speed Increase TomEV Fossil Fuel Free 12 04-10-2008 03:53 PM
Series Motor - Speed vs Torque TomEV Fossil Fuel Free 3 03-02-2008 12:27 PM
News: New Hampshire May Raise Speed Limit to 70 & ticket slowpokes RH77 General Efficiency Discussion 24 02-20-2008 06:37 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com