The climate change movement: July 28, 1995 to August 14, 2020 RIP

[freebeard]

They make it look like don't care, because they probably don't.

The view from here is that 90% of the predicted 2.1 million fatalities were saved by early, albeit unpopular, intervention. Similarly 400 children not re-united with their parents were out of 5,400 that were separated (1,500 of those by the current administration). Those parents have been contacted but they don't want their child repatriated to Mexico.

Therapeutics aren't where they need to be. An effective vaccine may never come.

What's coming is genetic hackers brewing up who knows what in a garage. Buckle up, buttercup.

[sgtlethargic]

It's another case of USA#1: #1 infections and #1 deaths in the world.

Ramming through an extremist SC justice is much more urgent and important!

[oil pan 4]

It definitely is.
China virus will be over in a year or 2 worst case scenario, a scous appointment is typically 20 to 30 years. RBG was a relic from thr 1990s.

Europe "listened to the scientists" and look where they are now. Huge spikes in infections and deaths after extended lockdowns that wrecked their economy.
After a year obamaflu had infected 60 million people. So to think biden could handle a pandemic better is laughable. He will just do what europe is doing.
According to the WHO the lock downs will double the number of people in poverty and will at least double the number of childern suffering from malnutrition by keeping the schools closed.
I just get the feeling liberals hate poor people.

I think the virus is bidens running mate not fake kamala.

[sgtlethargic]

It definitely is if you're a desperate party that knows it's in the minority and that their platform is unpopular, that the way they're going to try to rule is by breaking with norms and being as hypocritical as can be so they can stuff the court with extremist ~justices that will overturn laws they don't like. It definitely is if your party wants to steal another lost election. It definitely is if you're an evangelical and want women in their place (from centuries ago). It definitely is if you're a corporation that wants to get rid of the regulatory state so you can pollute all you want. It definitely is if you're obscenely wealthy and want to have finance, tax laws, etc in your favor.

[sgtlethargic]

We still haven't heard about the "pLandemic."

You act as if Europe is one country and that we're not at the start of the second wave that epidemiologists said would likely happen.

And, do you have an evidence to support your claims?

[sgtlethargic]

By the way, I'm not a fan of either old white guy.

[oil pan 4]

Well that's what the democrats have done with the supreme court since forever.
I like how the liberals scream like stuck pigs when the shoe is on the other foot.

[sgtlethargic]

Originally Posted by oil pan 4

Well that's what the democrats have done with the supreme court since forever.
I like how the liberals scream like stuck pigs when the shoe is on the other foot.

You act like a bit of social progress is a bad thing.

The Warren Court was the period in the history of the Supreme Court of the United States during which Earl Warren served as Chief Justice. Warren replaced the deceased Fred M. Vinson as Chief Justice in 1953, and Warren remained in office until he retired in 1969. Warren was succeeded as Chief Justice by Warren Burger. The Warren Court is often considered the most liberal court in US history.

Warren led a liberal majority that used judicial power in dramatic fashion, to the consternation of conservative opponents. The Warren Court expanded civil rights, civil liberties, judicial power, and the federal power in dramatic ways.[1] It has been widely recognized that the court, led by the liberal bloc, has created a major "Constitutional Revolution" in the history of United States.[2][3][4][5][6]

The Warren Court brought "one man, one vote" to the United States through a series of rulings, and created the Miranda warning.[7][8][9] In addition, the court was both applauded and criticized for bringing an end to de jure racial segregation in the United States, incorporating the Bill of Rights (i.e. including it in the 14th Amendment Due Process clause), and ending officially sanctioned voluntary prayer in public schools. The period is recognized as the highest point in judicial power that has receded ever since, but with a substantial continuing impact.[10][11]

[oil pan 4]

Another strawman.

[sgtlethargic]

Originally Posted by oil pan 4

Another strawman.

Chuckle.