11-03-2021, 06:07 PM
|
#411 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,544
Thanks: 8,086
Thanked 8,878 Times in 7,327 Posts
|
The flea said to the elephant "We're raising quite a dust aren't we?"
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
11-03-2021, 06:48 PM
|
#412 (permalink)
|
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
Considering a solar super flare can blow away 10% to 20% of the earth's atmosphere at a time. Green house gases are insignificant compared to the power of the sun.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
11-03-2021, 07:20 PM
|
#413 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,267
Thanks: 24,392
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
|
GHGs
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
Considering a solar super flare can blow away 10% to 20% of the earth's atmosphere at a time. Green house gases are insignificant compared to the power of the sun.
|
They're plenty capable of rendering the planet uninhabitable, and something we can affect, which can't be said for solar activity.
I'll remain focused on the possible.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
|
|
11-03-2021, 07:39 PM
|
#414 (permalink)
|
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,751
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,471 Times in 3,436 Posts
|
I'm going to try reading the latest IPCC for 10min a day. I'm on page 6 of 3939 currently. If I get discouraged I'll switch to the Bible.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
11-03-2021, 08:58 PM
|
#415 (permalink)
|
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
Life did great with CO2 levels much higher than 1,000 ppm.
So saying that more CO2 even double current CO2 is bad for life is just a lie.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
11-05-2021, 04:04 PM
|
#416 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,267
Thanks: 24,392
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
|
1,000 ppmv
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
Life did great with CO2 levels much higher than 1,000 ppm.
So saying that more CO2 even double current CO2 is bad for life is just a lie.
|
We were at 280 ppmv before the Industrial Revolution kicked off.
Currently, climate sensitivity, at a 'doubling' of carbon dioxide ( 560 ppmv ) will lead to the 3-C world ( 5.4 F warmer ).
Presently we're at around 412-ppmv.
Any use of the word 'life', in the context of justifying no climate action, would require some context.
Conditions supporting only single-cellular life on Earth may be a turn-off for some. Although it would be 'life.'
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
|
|
11-05-2021, 04:13 PM
|
#417 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,267
Thanks: 24,392
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
|
Reading the IPCC report
Please bear in mind that, due to time constraints required for the publication deadline, that there's an arbitrary cut-off for new information, and typically, when you read the report, it's already partially obsolete, with much information already superannuated.
Personally, it's a waste of time.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
|
|
11-05-2021, 05:49 PM
|
#418 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,544
Thanks: 8,086
Thanked 8,878 Times in 7,327 Posts
|
Which is why it helps to follow the daily news of space weather and peer-reviewed papers.
https://suspicious0bservers.org/ Nov 5th:
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
|
|
11-05-2021, 05:54 PM
|
#419 (permalink)
|
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,751
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,471 Times in 3,436 Posts
|
What I'm bearing in mind is that nobody can understand the infinite implications of change, but that generally speaking, slower change is preferable to rapid.
I read the FAQ portion yesterday and it seems 2 degrees increase was somewhat arbitrarily chosen as a line not to cross, with a stretch goal of 1.5 degrees to leave a more comfortable buffer. We've already increased 1 of those 2 degrees in the previous 150 years.
Overall, I'd say reading the material so far has slightly increased my perception of the risk of warming. If action is to be taken, some target to aim for must be created even if it's somewhat arbitrary.
There's way too much DIE (Diversity, Inclusion, Equity) discussion in the FAQ which detracts from the credibility it's attempting to convey, but I can ignore the nonsense and accept the reasonable information. Many would be turned off and unable to take anything seriously after reading the DIE stuff though. It was a bad move on their part if the goal was to inform and persuade.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
11-05-2021, 06:14 PM
|
#420 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,267
Thanks: 24,392
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
|
D.I.E.
I think that money and the market will just leave governments behind in the dust arguing, as they move investments and industry pivots, on timescales unimaginable in democracies, short of a declared war on global warming.
The warm, touchy-feely stuff isn't necessary for adult communication. Money will follow smart products. All will be beneficiaries, by default.
Power of the purse. That's what ended Apartheid. Protests and revolts meant nothing.
No one sheds a tear for the livery stables, stage coaches, kerosene lantern makers, ice-box manufacturers, pony express riders, or incandescent light bulb makers.
There will come a point when no one knows what pistons and oil filters are.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
|
|
