Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-27-2010, 01:23 AM   #21 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,741

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,322
Thanked 749 Times in 476 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO View Post
Maybe you can support that claim. All that I've read about NOx is it requires hydrocarbons and UV to create smog. Modern pollution controls have reduced vehicle HC output to the point that additional NOx control is pointless.
It's not only about smog. From What is Acid Rain and What Causes It?:
Quote:
Scientists discovered, and have confirmed, that sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) are the primary causes of acid rain.

__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-27-2010, 07:29 AM   #22 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO View Post
Maybe you can support that claim. All that I've read about NOx is it requires hydrocarbons and UV to create smog. Modern pollution controls have reduced vehicle HC output to the point that additional NOx control is pointless.
On gas engines.
On diesels, NOx (and PM) remains a serious problem.

Using biodiesel in non-EGR engines, NOx output is further increased over regular diesel.
(EPA test on non-EGR vehicles)

Quote:
Even so, if I net 10% better mileage with the disabled EGR, my total pollution output with biodiesel is WAY ahead.
Biodiesel has serious advantages over regular diesel, being renewable and having lower HC, particulate, sulphates and PAH emissions.

So why ruin its NOx emissions by disabling EGR

CO2 is not the issue as biodiesel is renewable.


Quote:
Additionally, I don't have to clean out my intakes anymore. Bonus.
If we all throw the emissions control gear out of our cars, motoring would be a lot cheaper for all ... Bonus.
Or not ?
We'd also be going back to the pollution levels of the 50's-60's-70's.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	EPAbiodiesel.jpg
Views:	65
Size:	54.3 KB
ID:	7226  
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side


Last edited by euromodder; 10-27-2010 at 07:37 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 11:56 AM   #23 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder View Post
On gas engines.
On diesels, NOx (and PM) remains a serious problem.
So you and some others claim.
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder View Post

Using biodiesel in non-EGR engines, NOx output is further increased over regular diesel.
(EPA test on non-EGR vehicles)
I accept that, but it's not a particularly large amount.
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder View Post

Biodiesel has serious advantages over regular diesel, being renewable and having lower HC, particulate, sulphates and PAH emissions.

So why ruin its NOx emissions by disabling EGR
Because the engine functions better and lasts longer. And it gets better mileage. Yes there are tradeoffs, but I am not convinced NOx is a serious problem. Acid rain is not an issue in the front range of Colorado, smog was much worse than it is now. My understanding of acid rain is it's caused mostly the sulfur from coal plants.

Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder View Post
CO2 is not the issue as biodiesel is renewable.

If we all throw the emissions control gear out of our cars, motoring would be a lot cheaper for all ... Bonus.
Or not ?
We'd also be going back to the pollution levels of the 50's-60's-70's.
I never advocated "throwing out all the emissions control gear from our cars", so please don't put words in my mouth. I am not ripping out the catalytic converters from my vehicles, and certainly not disabling EGR or evaporative controls on my gasser. I also never advocated making modifications solely on the basis of cost savings either.

If you are reasonable I think you will find my actions are proper enough, regardless of whether you agree with me specifically. If you want to be a purist, I'm not interested in your judgment. You will only invite the same on yourself.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 02:41 PM   #24 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,741

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,322
Thanked 749 Times in 476 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO View Post
Yes there are tradeoffs, but I am not convinced NOx is a serious problem. Acid rain is not an issue in the front range of Colorado, smog was much worse than it is now. My understanding of acid rain is it's caused mostly the sulfur from coal plants.
So if the NOx you produce doesn't effect you locally, then it's not a problem?
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 03:28 PM   #25 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw View Post
So if the NOx you produce doesn't effect you locally, then it's not a problem?
I knew this was coming.

I already stated my position that the small amount of NOx is not a big problem compared to the gain in fuel efficiency, and the marginal amount extra from burning biodiesel is balanced by using renewable, lower carbon fuel.

Maybe I should go back to burning fossil fuels? If you are not happy with my compromises, I can tell you emphatically I'm not happy with yours either. So let's agree to disagree, OK?
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 04:25 PM   #26 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
Seeing as how you live in Denver, you have to pass emmisions tests, correct? Or is it exempt due to being a diesel?

I lived in CO Springs a few years ago for a year, and have a ton of family in Auroura and surrounding area. I do miss seeing those mountains. I had Pikes Peak as my front door vista during that time, and its beauty is something I miss greatly.
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 05:20 PM   #27 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
We do have emissions testing specifically for diesels. It's twice as expensive as gassers, and annual instead of biannual. However the only measurable is soot output as opacity, and the standard is quite low. You've got to be smoking pretty heavily to fail. And biodiesel helps with less soot output.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2010, 10:52 PM   #28 (permalink)
Aero Wannabe
 
COcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NW Colo
Posts: 738

TDi - '04 VW Golf
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 52.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 705
Thanked 219 Times in 170 Posts
Diesel EGR FAQ

I just found this article today. It may be useful for this discussion. It is written specifically for the VW TDI engine (pumpe duese is the injectors driven by the cam as in my car).

TDI EGR system FAQ

"Removal of the EGR will turn on the check engine light which will results in automatic failure during emissions testing and can prevent you from registering the vehicle in many states. Disabling the light or taping over it won't work since they plug in an obd2 scanner which reads your car's computer. There are ways to trick the computer into not showing a check engine light like through a chip tune but tampering with emissions devices is illegal in most places.

The biggest gain is reduced cleaning of the intake manifold. However, ultra low sulfur fuel used in all US and Canadian diesel fuel has greatly reduced major clogging. Biodiesel users report no excess intake buildup although there'll always be a small film. There are only small mileage or power gains from disabling the EGR system since it only operates at partial throttle and idle. Generally speaking, at full throttle, the EGR system is closed by the computer so it makes no noticeable difference in peak power. If you are removing the EGR for reduced pumping losses and the small power or economy gains, bigger and better gains can be made elsewhere. See 1000q: basic performance upgrades for a list of starting performance modifications. Also, the pumpe duse cars use an O2 sensor to regulate the EGR system much more efficiently than non pumpe duse cars. Even newer technologies on the common rail system cars allow more precise fuel delivery and burn, resulting in less intake clogging."
__________________
60 mpg hwy highest, 50+mpg lifetime
TDi=fast frugal fun
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post621801


Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. Mechanical friction increases as the square, so increasing speed requires progressively more power.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2010, 02:17 AM   #29 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
^^^

I've tried that, just pulling the EGR control, and it results in drivability issues and in the short time I tolerated it, no discernable mileage change. Probably because the MIL is set (malfunction indication lamp.) But I am running something else in my Jeep, a circuit that electronically emulates the presence of the EGR system so the engine computer does not trip the MIL. I intend to do the same on my ALH TDI.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2010, 02:34 AM   #30 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,741

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,322
Thanked 749 Times in 476 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO View Post
Yes there are tradeoffs, but I am not convinced NOx is a serious problem. Acid rain is not an issue in the front range of Colorado, smog was much worse than it is now. My understanding of acid rain is it's caused mostly the sulfur from coal plants.
So if the NOx you produce doesn't effect you locally, then it's not a problem?
I knew this was coming.
For me, using less fuel is part of how I try to pollute less. If I had the option to reduce fuel consumption and certain pollutants while increasing certain others, I would research the matter and make an educated choice. I believe this is what you did in good faith and I respect that. If you are not indifferent to NOx pollution on a global scale and your post cited above was only worded unfortunately, then I take back my comment.

How a certain engine reacts to adding/removing EGR seems to be a highly individual thing. Some report milage going up, others down. I read recently that in newer cars the ECU has so much control over the engine that EGR operation is almost unnoticible, so we have cleaner cars without sacrificing performance.

I would also like to ask everyone to keep the focus on the differences between cooled and non-cooled EGR. There many threads on EGR in general, so please move any off-topic discussions there.

__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Piwoslaw For This Useful Post:
UFO (10-28-2010)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Increasing EGR flow for better mileage Daox EcoModding Central 232 01-26-2015 10:43 AM
Trouble Code PO401 EGR Flow Insufficient Detected Ford Man Off-Topic Tech 4 12-09-2011 12:45 PM
Hey Civic VX owners - I need your help - please test your egr valve jadziasman Off-Topic Tech 5 06-27-2010 07:56 AM
Metro EGR passage cleanout needed -- any tips? lyd DIY / How-to 2 09-30-2008 11:11 PM
EGR dilution for more MPG? cfg83 EcoModding Central 18 04-29-2008 09:11 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com