Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Off-Topic Tech
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-08-2010, 02:36 PM   #21 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,691

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,269
Thanked 721 Times in 458 Posts
Another discussion lead to trains and that got me thinking (yes, it happens):
When does a train need the most power? Either going up a hill or starting from a station/junction.
When does it have a surplus of energy? Either going down a hill or braking before a station/junction.

So, the electric assist would not only be on hills, but also within 2-3 miles of a station/junction. On a hill, electric helper engines would be added to the train, but in the case of simple acceleration/deceleration the loco itself would have to be able to channel the energy into the catenary. How much would have to be changed in the construction of a typical diesel-electric loco to allow it power its wheels straight from the overhead grid? Since the catenary cables wouldn't be longer than 2-3 miles in each direction, then there is no need for outrageously high voltage, the voltage can be what ever is used in the electrical side of the engine, so no need for the large, heavy transformers that make up most of a pure electric loco.

And what about storing energy on-site? Instead of timing trains to go up and down hills, or start and stop at a station, at the same time, the hill/station/juction could have a device for storing energy. Since it wouldn't be mobile it could be large and heavy, and since it would be in an area with frequent train passes it would only need to store energy for no more than a few hours, usually for less than an hour. I'm thinking water pumping, flywheels, ultracapacitors, whatever. This would also allow the device to be gradually charged from the grid and then give that energy back in a burst.

__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-08-2010, 03:05 PM   #22 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,803

Appliance White - '93 Geo Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Chevy Sprint Base
Thanks: 91
Thanked 459 Times in 327 Posts
Locomotives need weight for traction. New rolling stock could be designed with motors and electrical hook-ups at the couplers, but schemes such as rack-and-pinion arrangements to enhance traction have never been trouble-free. Self-powered cars with smart couplers can be much lighter and more versatile. I'm amazed to see diesel-electric drives being installed in new ships, after the 1st two ferries ballasted that way died of old age without being emulated.

FWIW, during a long power outage, Montreal City used a locomotive generator to power up some buildings to provide essential services. Hydro Quebec had said it couldn't be done, but they were busy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2010, 05:52 PM   #23 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
Locomotives can generate power for buildings.

1. Open building disconnect
2. Line up locomotives
3. Disconnect the rectifier (converts AC to DC)
4. Forget step 3 if the locomotive is new enough to use AC traction
motors
5. For older AC/DC locomotives, set to throttle 5. It gives you about 1.5 MW @ 460 volts, 55 Hz.
6. For newer locomotives, set the VFD at 60 Hz and run her WOT. You should get about 3 MW/unit @ 460 volts

Old hat to railroaders.
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Big Dave For This Useful Post:
Bicycle Bob (06-11-2010)
Old 06-11-2010, 01:28 AM   #24 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bicycle Bob View Post
...but schemes such as rack-and-pinion arrangements to enhance traction have never been trouble-free.
The Swiss seem to manage them quite well. There are a lot of little spur railroads going from the valleys up to mountain villages, using the rack-and-pinion arrangement to climb what looked to me like about 1 in 3 grades.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2010, 11:09 AM   #25 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,803

Appliance White - '93 Geo Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Chevy Sprint Base
Thanks: 91
Thanked 459 Times in 327 Posts
It is good to hear that rack and pinions have been made to work where needed. Any news on reliability in winter? Is the rack covered? Sealed?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2010, 11:47 AM   #26 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bicycle Bob View Post
It is good to hear that rack and pinions have been made to work where needed. Any news on reliability in winter? Is the rack covered? Sealed?
The racks (of the ones I've been on, anyway) aren't sealed or anything. I don't know much about reliability, but most have been operating year-round since the late 19th/early 20th century.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2010, 07:52 PM   #27 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
Rack & pinion railroads work OK for short distances where there is no other way to beat the grade, but nobody ever accused them of being overly efficient.
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2012, 05:09 PM   #28 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,217
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
""Wind tunnel testing of a Prevost H5-60 articulated bus demonstrates a drag coefficient 50 percent smaller than that of a typical class 8 truck while maintaining similar cargo volume and exemplifying gap seals required for such streamlining."

Rail Versus Trucking: Who's The Greenest Freight Carrier? : TreeHugger

Would there be any point in attempting to streamline a train? If you put an accordion between semi and trailer that was the width of both, would that be more aerodynamic?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2012, 06:01 PM   #29 (permalink)
Wannabe greenie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 1,098

The Clunker (retired) - '90 Honda Accord EX sedan
Team Honda
90 day: 29.49 mpg (US)

Mountain Goat - '96 Ford Ranger XLT 4x4 SuperCab
90 day: 18 mpg (US)

Zippy - '10 Kymco Agility 125
90 day: 65.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 53 Times in 40 Posts
So basically if we do all of these very expensive things to the truck fleet, it could theoretically almost approach 80% of the efficiency of trains. And that's if we do nothing to the trains.

I wonder how much collateral damage trucks do to the average economy of the fleet of cars vying for freeway space. More trucks on the road mean more road damage, more traffic jams and more traffic at offramps, onramps and in industrial areas.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2012, 09:56 PM   #30 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,217
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
It also means crazies in SUVs trying to get around them more often.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
'93 Civic 40.6 mpg + Harbor Freight utility trailer, Honda CL125, Honda CH80 scoot begreen Introductions 13 08-29-2013 06:37 AM
Railroad Train Aerodynamics aerohead Aerodynamics 37 07-20-2011 07:35 AM
LOL @ Harbor Freight stuff. Christ Off-Topic Tech 30 08-18-2009 12:25 PM
Train Fairing Sunwapta Aerodynamics 2 08-25-2008 10:36 PM
EV train conversion? metromizer Fossil Fuel Free 0 07-30-2008 03:04 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com