03-02-2023, 02:11 PM
|
#31 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,520
Thanks: 8,073
Thanked 8,870 Times in 7,322 Posts
|
duckduckgo.com/?q=%27Chorus+Meshcon+motor%27&ia=web
Quote:
Enginuity Systems Home Page › files › MeshconDerivation.pdf
Chorus™ Motor Tutorial Meshcon (Optimized Variable Torque) Derivation ...
Chorus™ Motor Tutorial Meshcon (Optimized Variable Torque) Derivation Analysis of Meshcon Winding Voltages In the Chorus™ 'Meshcon' system, a high phase order inverter is connected to a high phase order concentrated winding induction motor using a mesh connection.
|
Why had noone mentiond this before?
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
03-04-2023, 02:41 PM
|
#32 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,864
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,683 Times in 1,501 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
People are habitual creatures, not rational.
|
Of course.
Quote:
When we lost power for 2 weeks during the ice storm, my grandmother refused to let us run a space heater in her room from a genset. She kept referring to the utilities estimate that power would be restored by 5pm on Sunday (in just a few hours). Look out the window. There's 2 miles of down power lines. You don't fix 2 miles of down power lines out in the boonies in a few hours when cities have priority.
|
For some older folks it's quite hard to let some habits go.
|
|
|
03-06-2023, 11:32 AM
|
#33 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,256
Thanks: 24,382
Thanked 7,359 Times in 4,759 Posts
|
why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
|
Because none of you guys remain 40-years behind the times like I do!
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-01-2023, 08:45 PM
|
#34 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 130
Bu - '08 Chevrolet Malibu LS 90 day: 32.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 52
Thanked 73 Times in 36 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
* There's a link to a link for the Yale research.
* All your points are addressed by Jonny Lieberman.
* BEV battery production averages the pollution of 74-gallons of gas.
* Where ICE vehicles need 9-million barrels of oil/day, BEVs require only 2.3-million barrels/day equivalency.
* Energy infrastructure capacity buildout for BEVs requires only 25.5% that of ICE for equivalency.
* ICE is a whale oil lamp, vs LED for BEVs.
* BEVs can operate without fossil fuel. ICE cannot.
* BEVs can mitigate climate change. ICE cannot.
* BEV regen can recover braking energy. ICE cannot.
* BEV sedan pollution equations favor BEV over ICE after 1.4-1.5-years.
* BEV SUVs after about 1.6- 1.9-years.
* Even with a 2-year lease on a BEV will net out better than ICE.
* In 2022, about 22% of the US power grid was green.
* 2023 is expected to be 24%.
* Wind is predicted to grow 3-X by 2040.
* Solar is predicted to grow 4-X by 2040.
* BEV pickup trucks after about 1.6-years.
|
You lost me at "mitigate climate change". We're near a minimum in this latest interglacial period...meaning 3* cooler than the peak. Even the most extreme doomsday "prediction" is 2.5* warmer than today in the next century. CO2 is 0.04% of the atmosphere, humans actually produce a small fraction of total global CO2, and cars/commercial/refineries produce a small fraction of that. The tail doesn't wag the dog.
Buying a six figure car to "save gas" and "fight climate change" sounds like propaganda. I agree that cars aren't evolving nearly quickly enough, but put some blame on the EPA and NHTSA for legislating cars into the porkers they are now. A remake of the 1994 Civic DX with a small turbo diesel would get better-than-hybrid economy, and be affordable-but it's illegal.
__________________
“Soft shapes follow us through life. Nature does not make angles. Hips and bellies and breasts — all the best designers have to do with erotic shapes and fluidity of form.” - Luigi Colani
|
|
|
11-01-2023, 09:45 PM
|
#35 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,742
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,469 Times in 3,434 Posts
|
It's a 3rd rail topic. People want to believe they can pay indulgences in the form of consumerism to get into the good graces of Gaia. There are worse religions and practices though.
I'm a fan of EVs but don't need to form a religion around it. I find myself debunking EV myths in other forums. Some people need to believe EVs will either save us or doom us.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-02-2023, 12:55 PM
|
#36 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,256
Thanks: 24,382
Thanked 7,359 Times in 4,759 Posts
|
'humans'
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERTW
You lost me at "mitigate climate change". We're near a minimum in this latest interglacial period...meaning 3* cooler than the peak. Even the most extreme doomsday "prediction" is 2.5* warmer than today in the next century. CO2 is 0.04% of the atmosphere, humans actually produce a small fraction of total global CO2, and cars/commercial/refineries produce a small fraction of that. The tail doesn't wag the dog.
Buying a six figure car to "save gas" and "fight climate change" sounds like propaganda. I agree that cars aren't evolving nearly quickly enough, but put some blame on the EPA and NHTSA for legislating cars into the porkers they are now. A remake of the 1994 Civic DX with a small turbo diesel would get better-than-hybrid economy, and be affordable-but it's illegal.
|
Human combustion of fossil fuel, each year, is equivalent to a forest fire covering the entire surface of Earth, oceans, deserts, high mountains, etc., included, times 1.75, each year. That's the 'arithmetic' of global warming.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
11-03-2023, 10:22 AM
|
#37 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,265
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
And if everyone on earth switched to EVs it becomes what, 1.5 surfaces of earth worth of forest being burnt.
Trying to decarbonize anything but the power grid with anything other than nuclear is a joke.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
11-03-2023, 01:28 PM
|
#38 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,520
Thanks: 8,073
Thanked 8,870 Times in 7,322 Posts
|
Quote:
Human combustion of fossil fuel, each year, is equivalent to a forest fire covering the entire surface of Earth, oceans, deserts, high mountains, etc., included, times 1.75, each year. That's the 'arithmetic' of global warming.
|
Not the first time you've made that assertion. Sources?
The last time that happened was IIRC the Younger Dryas. The smoke precipitated a reversion to Ice Age conditions.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
11-03-2023, 02:31 PM
|
#39 (permalink)
|
AKA - Jason
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,599
Thanks: 325
Thanked 2,146 Times in 1,453 Posts
|
I'm a bit surprise how much talk about EVs focuses on CO2 instead of local air pollution. Global warming and climate change is an abstract topic for most people and covers a decades long timeline. On the other hand smog is something that people can see with their own eyes and feel in their own lungs. The wind changes and in a day or two clear skies turn brown and one can look at the horizon and not see mountains that are only 50 miles away. Then the wind changes again and the pollution is blown away and the sky is clear again. It is something that can happen in a matter of days or weeks instead of talking about CO2 concentrations and temperatures decades into the future.
In my opinion the primary reason to move to EV is to clean up urban air quality - reduction in CO2 is just a bonus.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JSH For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-03-2023, 02:51 PM
|
#40 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,520
Thanks: 8,073
Thanked 8,870 Times in 7,322 Posts
|
In the 1970s I was headed East on 126 when I noticed the setting Sun was perfectly centered in the round rear view mirror, and I wished I had a camera. A few seconds later I realized it was setting into the air pollution and the real sunset came a little later.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
|