Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-24-2015, 05:06 AM   #51 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 174

Silver Magnum - '03 Dodge Ram 1500 Laramie
90 day: 11.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtamiyaphile View Post
An average car cruises on about 7hp at moderate speeds. I could see a truck needing maybe 50hp max at cruise.

To work this out you need your hp for given speed/rpm X load. If your truck cruises at 30% load then that's about 50hp based on your figures.
I have no idea what it is now, if I'm on the gas more than a hair (out of OD naturally) its busy accelerating to around 80mph while staying under 2500......I'm just trying to figure out based on the engine in its old stock form needed to produce to move and maintain the truck at a reasonable speed

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-24-2015, 05:17 AM   #52 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 174

Silver Magnum - '03 Dodge Ram 1500 Laramie
90 day: 11.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
iowahawk: The Real Acme

This sounds like exactly what you are looking for.
Dear lord........I must make me one of these......for reasons.......(thoughts of having an "I win" button overwhelm all logical thought)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 01:30 PM   #53 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,572 Times in 2,836 Posts
Swapping gears, not cheap is going to be about the least expensive option to see any real improvement.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 02:43 PM   #54 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,757
Thanks: 8,165
Thanked 8,947 Times in 7,389 Posts
Historic rocket powered by rubber fuel - Technology & science - Space - Space.com | NBC News

The fuel,N-propyl nitrate, may be hard to come by. Spaceship One burns a combination of [an ingredient of] rubber and nitrous oxide. Burning rubber and NOS would make it fast and furious.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
Xist (01-24-2015)
Old 01-24-2015, 05:06 PM   #55 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 174

Silver Magnum - '03 Dodge Ram 1500 Laramie
90 day: 11.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
Swapping gears, not cheap is going to be about the least expensive option to see any real improvement.
I already have some tall gears, 3.55s because ironically these high gears work better with a stroker for getting power to the ground anyway and I can't go much lower.....the only thing lower would be 3.21 gears
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 05:41 PM   #56 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,326
Thanks: 24,448
Thanked 7,391 Times in 4,786 Posts
620-bhp

Quote:
Originally Posted by Striker2237 View Post
well what i meant is that hemi would take the place of my engine, and 345hp is not anywhere close to 620
At what time or condition would you utilize 620-bhp?
My T-100,naked,only required 47-horsepower to maintain 70-mph.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 10:29 PM   #57 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 174

Silver Magnum - '03 Dodge Ram 1500 Laramie
90 day: 11.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
At what time or condition would you utilize 620-bhp?
My T-100,naked,only required 47-horsepower to maintain 70-mph.
Drag strip............
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2015, 06:45 PM   #58 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,326
Thanks: 24,448
Thanked 7,391 Times in 4,786 Posts
Drag racing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Striker2237 View Post
Drag strip............
If you're doing 1/8 or 1/4-mile,your power to weight ratio will be the greatest factor in getting ETs down.Or maintaining what you've already got.
Mass is the poison of acceleration.
If you add a second powerplant/powertrain,that additional weight will really cut into your time and exit velocity.
With no aluminum,or lightweight composite body available,it will be hard to cut weight in order to add weight ,while maintaining a constant weight.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2015, 01:06 AM   #59 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 174

Silver Magnum - '03 Dodge Ram 1500 Laramie
90 day: 11.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
If you're doing 1/8 or 1/4-mile,your power to weight ratio will be the greatest factor in getting ETs down.Or maintaining what you've already got.
Mass is the poison of acceleration.
If you add a second powerplant/powertrain,that additional weight will really cut into your time and exit velocity.
With no aluminum,or lightweight composite body available,it will be hard to cut weight in order to add weight ,while maintaining a constant weight.
Oh 2nd engine wouldn't be for speed lol! I would make it dis-connectable so It wont get in the way of the 408
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2015, 04:01 AM   #60 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 333
Thanks: 16
Thanked 79 Times in 54 Posts
Send a message via MSN to markweatherill
A V8 that can do cylinder deactivation would be a better bet. Not as good mpg as a four-cylinder - but arguably better in lots of ways than having a separate four-cylinder in the vehicle.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com