Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-21-2009, 08:54 AM   #1 (permalink)
button presser
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Adirondacks, NY
Posts: 20

TAVs Prius - '10 Toyota Prius IV
90 day: 50.86 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to vielecustoms Send a message via MSN to vielecustoms Send a message via Yahoo to vielecustoms
Doing something wrong?

I know this is going to seem strange. I may be doing something wrong here but my car seems to get worse mpg when I am taking it easy, than when I am driving normal? I have been driving with constant speed, and trying to keep a cirtian mpg on the scangauge, avoiding hard acceleration, gliding down hills in neutral, changed my route to a flatter, shorter one. I have not been lugging the engine but I am not hammering on it either. my scangauge is off showing more mpg than the car actually got last time (usually it is showing less than actual),
but this last fill up I was driving normal and got really good mileage compared to when I was taking it easy and trying to get better mpgs. Part of the problem is I used a diffrent gas station, because it was on the way (mobil), vs the one that is close to my apartment(sunoco). but I am getting the best results from the sunoco so I will get my gas exclusively from there from now on.

any tips or pointers?

__________________

Last edited by vielecustoms; 11-21-2009 at 09:21 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-23-2009, 09:09 AM   #2 (permalink)
Mechanical Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 190

The Truck - '02 Dodge Ram 1500 SLT Sport
90 day: 13.32 mpg (US)

The Van 2 - '06 Honda Odyssey EX
90 day: 20.56 mpg (US)

GoKart - '14 Hyundai Elantra GT base 6MT
90 day: 31.25 mpg (US)

Godzilla - '21 Ford F350 XL
90 day: 12.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Accelerating harder and short-shift to keep load up to 75-80% and achieve cruising speed in as short a time as possible is preferable to *****-footing up to speed. Accelerating yields poor economy; minimize the time spent in this mode. Accelerating at WOT in open-loop enrichment yields horrendous economy so stop short of this limit (usually 85% load in most EFI programs). Short-shifting helps keep load up and prevents high piston speeds that increase internal frictional losses in the engine. Usually 2000 rpm is good unless your engine has a very short (less than 3.25 inches or so) stroke, at which point going up in RPM is ok.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 09:42 AM   #3 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
What you do after accelerating is far more important, in the big picture, than how you accelerate. EG. if you're regularly forced to brake after high load acceleration, your fuel economy will end up in the toilet compared to feather-footing up to a stop.

vielecustoms: also be careful about drawing conclusions about what works and what doesn't based on driving conditions / routes that aren't identical. EG:

-- as the weather gets colder your mileage is dropping.

-- If the new route is significantly short enough, you'll get worse mileage simply because the car spends proportionately more distance coming up to full operating temperature (not just the engine - the whole drivetrain, including transmission, tires, bearings...)

-- You might have had a short fill on the bad tank (unless you're filling to the brim every time)

-- Sounds like you're still dialling in the ScanGauge accuracy. If you're
"driving to a target MPG" when it's optimistic, that'll obviously lower your actual numbers.

You're in the Adirondacks, I see. You should consider going out to one of the AMEC economy events in the spring. Even if you didn't compete, I bet there are people who would be happy to talk to you / demo / give you a clinic on technique if you're interested.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2009, 10:05 AM   #4 (permalink)
button presser
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Adirondacks, NY
Posts: 20

TAVs Prius - '10 Toyota Prius IV
90 day: 50.86 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to vielecustoms Send a message via MSN to vielecustoms Send a message via Yahoo to vielecustoms
the new route is shorter but only about 10 miles, it is still about 25 miles each way, vs about 35 the other route. the new route is mostly 55 mph fairly flat with a few rolling hills, and only about 1/4 mile of city driving. the old route has several steep hills, 55 mph and about 8 miles of city driving.

I am still calibrating the scangauge, so I have not been as dependent on the numbers from that.

I will use your suggestions and do some more reading.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2009, 08:23 PM   #5 (permalink)
OCD Master EcoModder
 
brucepick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eastern CT, USA
Posts: 1,933

Outasight - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 54.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 429
Thanked 391 Times in 261 Posts
vielecustoms -
Are you saying you got better mpg on the old route?

I would guess you'd get better mpg on the new route: mostly steady 55mph with few starts/stops.

Actual mpg is what counts of course, so you can't go entirely by the ScanGauge, especially if you change the adjustment after you fill up.
__________________
Coast long and prosper.
Driving '00 Honda Insight, acquired Feb 2016.


  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2009, 02:24 PM   #6 (permalink)
Civic 4 Life
 
KJSatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 229

Civics Lesson - '08 Honda Civic LX
Team Honda
90 day: 40.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by brucepick View Post
(snip) Actual mpg is what counts of course, (snip)
Just by having a route about 30% shorter you're saving a lot of gas, even if you lose some mpg's. Obviously there's a turning point there, but it would take a fairly severe decline in mpg.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EV with Gas. Just Plain Wrong. bennelson Fossil Fuel Free 15 06-23-2009 04:29 PM
What could be wrong if im only getting 40mpg in my 1990 CRX HF? dylanu EcoModding Central 13 10-08-2008 12:50 PM
Think Motorcycles and Scooters are Great for the Environment? Wrong! SuperTrooper EcoModder Blog Discussion 13 09-13-2008 10:01 AM
EOC Question - what did i do wrong? Doofus McFancypants Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 12 02-15-2008 01:18 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com