07-02-2012, 03:13 PM
|
#51 (permalink)
|
Deadly Efficient
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Goshen, Indiana
Posts: 1,234
Thanks: 134
Thanked 176 Times in 91 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
Is this the common rule in the U.S.?
|
The Indiana code is pretty vague (italics are mine);
"IC 9-21-3-7
Signals exhibiting colored lights or arrows; requirements; explanation of colors
Sec. 7. (a) Whenever traffic is controlled by traffic control signals exhibiting different colored lights or colored lighted arrows successively, one (1) at a time or in combination, only the colors green, red, or yellow may be used, except for special pedestrian signals under IC 9-21-18.
(b) The lights indicate and apply to drivers of vehicles and pedestrians as follows:
...
(2) Steady yellow indication means the following:
(A) Vehicular traffic facing a steady circular yellow or yellow arrow signal is warned that the related green movement is being terminated and that a red indication will be exhibited immediately thereafter.
(B) A pedestrian facing a steady circular yellow or yellow arrow signal, unless otherwise directed by a pedestrian control signal, is advised that there is insufficient time to cross the roadway before a red indication is shown, and a pedestrian may not start to cross the roadway at that time."
I was taught that yellow means, "if you're in the intersection or can't safely stop, get on through the intersection. If you're approaching the intersection, prepare to stop." So I think you may be both (half) right. Maybe Mr. Rowe could say, "Don't think that speeding up to get through a yellow light is a mortal sin or anything; yellow means “safely clear the intersection,” not “you have to stop NOW.”
__________________
-Terry
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
07-02-2012, 03:26 PM
|
#52 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
In Ontario, amber means stop, unless you cannot safely stop.
|
Should be the same in all countries that are party to the 1968 Vienna Convention on Road Traffic - but the US isn't.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side
|
|
|
07-02-2012, 03:31 PM
|
#53 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel_Dave
In my opinion, the notion that fuel-cutoff is the holy grail is one of the biggest falicies out there in hypermiling. The ideal of course is engine off in neutral, but in some cases even idling in neutral is better than motoring with fuel-cutoff.
|
For me, coasting while idling in neutral has been the trick to get below 5L/100km - above 47 mpg.
Before that, I used engine braking a lot.
Now I often coast to slow down, even on the motorway.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to euromodder For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-02-2012, 04:21 PM
|
#54 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,813
Thanks: 4,327
Thanked 4,480 Times in 3,445 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf
That's wrong, because torque is an angular quantity. It's the product of a force applied times the distance from the axis at which it's applied. (Think of a torque wrench.) And of course pounds and feet are just English units: in metric it'd be measured in newton-meters.
|
Exactly right. If I hung my 185lb body from a lever that is attached parallel to the ground at a distance of 1ft from the fulcrum, I impart 185ft/lbs of force. Whether anything moves is irrelevant.
Automotive texts refer to torque when tightening various bolts. Tightening a lug nut to 75ft/lbs means to turn until that much resistive force is encountered. It says nothing of what distance to turn.
|
|
|
07-02-2012, 04:52 PM
|
#55 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel_Dave
In my opinion, the notion that fuel-cutoff is the holy grail is one of the biggest falicies out there in hypermiling. The ideal of course is engine off in neutral, but in some cases even idling in neutral is better than motoring with fuel-cutoff.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder
For me, coasting while idling in neutral has been the trick to get below 5L/100km - above 47 mpg.
Before that, I used engine braking a lot.
Now I often coast to slow down, even on the motorway.
|
Absolutely right.
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
07-03-2012, 01:38 PM
|
#56 (permalink)
|
Pishtaco
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,485
Thanks: 56
Thanked 286 Times in 181 Posts
|
I'm disappointed. I PMed the OP before last weekend, but never received the book to review. Bummer, as I'm retired with lots of time to read.
__________________
Darrell
Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.5 mpg avg over 53,000 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg
|
|
|
07-03-2012, 01:56 PM
|
#57 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
|
Same here. I never got anything either. Maybe he got caught in the weather. Will one of you who did recieve it volunteer to pass it along to some of the rest of us?
__________________
Diesel Dave
My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".
1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg
BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html
|
|
|
07-03-2012, 02:03 PM
|
#58 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
In Ontario, amber means stop, unless you cannot safely stop.
|
And if you can't stop safely, you speed up to get through before it turns red, no?
|
|
|
07-03-2012, 02:51 PM
|
#59 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
james: Nope. If I've passed the "point of no return", I just hold my speed through the amber. If I have to speed up to avoid catching the red, I probably could have stopped (assuming no tailgater). Maybe the amber lights are longer around here?
---
Darrell & Dave: I emailed Richard to let him know there are others who would like a review copy.
EDIT: fyi, he listed his location as Ocala, FL
|
|
|
07-03-2012, 03:37 PM
|
#60 (permalink)
|
NightKnight
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Placerville, CA
Posts: 1,595
Thanks: 315
Thanked 314 Times in 187 Posts
|
You guys are probably keeping him really busy with all your excellent feedback!
Tropical Storm Debby hit the gulf coast of FL, but doesn't seem to be nearly as bad as the power outages and heat they are seeing in the Mid-Atlantic...
__________________
|
|
|
|