09-30-2022, 03:20 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,076
Thanks: 2,902
Thanked 2,560 Times in 1,586 Posts
|
Efficient alignment
I could use some opinions on alignment numbers.
I haven't taken the MX-5 in for an alignment yet. It tracks straight, but it's a fair bet that the previous owner had a fairly aggressive, perhaps even autocross-oriented alignment on the car, based on how much front camber there is.
Factory specs, per wheel:
Front:
Caster: 5.5° to 7.5°
Camber: -1.7° to 0.3°
Toe: -1/16" to 1/8" (ideally 1/32" toe in)
Rear:
Camber: -2.7° to -0.7°
Toe: -1/32" to 5/32" (ideally 1/32" toe in)
Flyin' Miata recommends the following for aggressively driven street cars:
Front:
Caster: 8.0°
Camber: -1.8°
Toe in: 1/32" per side
Rear:
Camber: -1.8°
Toe in: 1/32" per side
~
I take corners at rather high speeds, so I'm looking for a reasonable compromise. I'm thinking of dialing the caster back just a bit, perhaps 6°, and setting camber to something like -1.5°. What I'm not certain about is toe. I can see a reason for having just a bit of rear toe in, but since the car is propelled by the rear wheels and it ought to have a tendency to toe-in anyway under power. What would be the purpose of slight front toe in? Thoughts on zero toe, front and back?
Last edited by Ecky; 09-30-2022 at 06:07 PM..
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
09-30-2022, 10:38 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,265
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,568 Times in 2,832 Posts
|
Zero toe in back is normal, zero toe in up front is considered "in spec" on most vehicles.
I ask for zero toe in on the leaf when I get it aligned.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-30-2022, 11:06 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Tire Geek
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 796
Thanks: 4
Thanked 393 Times in 240 Posts
|
Toe in is stable, toe out is unstable (the vehicle can't figure out which side to follow).
On solid rear axles, toe isn't a problem because it is very close to zero.
Camber tends to cause good cornering, but at the expensive of tire wear. So it is very important to get the toe very close to the target value if you want good tire wear.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CapriRacer For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-30-2022, 11:18 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Somewhat crazed
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,355
Thanks: 526
Thanked 1,188 Times in 1,048 Posts
|
A nice new tight front steering system might get away with zero toe for a while. Test stuff and see if the system flexes, and how much. The how much is twice what your setting should be for a side if your preventing the other side from moving. Ditto for the rear.
Camber is a more personal thing since it loads the steering. I like lots of negative in the F250, but not much in the golf because I feel it makes the steering heavy and less responsive. Positive makes steering bump twitchy on some cars, neutral makes the tie rods flex erratically and any play is magnified.
My $0.02. YMMV and I don't worry about wear as much as handling or traction since my tires tend to sun rot
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
|
|
|
09-30-2022, 12:49 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: Bremerton, WA
Posts: 107
Thanks: 36
Thanked 60 Times in 45 Posts
|
I would keep some toe in on the front (in the middle of the recommended spec for toe in), and use the minimum recommended toe in on the back.
Toe in is required because suspension flexes at higher speed from tire drag. This will cause it to be zero toe in at highway speed or during braking. What you don't want is toe out at speed. That leads to very twitchy and dangerous steering. Aftermarket racing suspension is much stiffer than stamped steel factree components and you can get away with less toe in than stock since there is less flex.
If you hypermile at 50 mph or less, you could get away with zero toe in front and back.
As far as caster, more positive caster is more stable at speed but leads to harder (effort used) steering at low speed. Camber, IDK. I like zero just for tire wear, especially if you are running maximum tire pressure for gas mileage. There is some advantage with having camber cornering, as it allows the maximum size contact patch on the road.
__________________
97 Passat TDI Wagon
Bosio 520 DLC nozzles, chip tune
Mufflerectomy, ALH Injection Pump
317k miles
Scan Gauge II
full belly pan
26 gallon tank
|
|
|
09-30-2022, 01:04 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,509
Thanks: 8,063
Thanked 8,866 Times in 7,318 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapriRacer
On solid rear axles, toe isn't a problem because it is very close to zero.
|
I had a street rod shop do a four-wheel alignment on my Type III notchback, and it had the most responsive steering of anything I've driven. I think it was the rear toe, but IDK if it was plus or minus from zero.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
09-30-2022, 05:18 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
|
High caster is supposed to give better steering feel and reduced camber when the wheel is turned. I would keep max caster. -1.5 camber is not bad for tire wear at all, I would be okay with that.
Not sure about toe, but my uninformed opinion is to err towards 0. If factory asks for toe in, I would personally feel the urge to reduce the toe in.
|
|
|
09-30-2022, 06:08 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,076
Thanks: 2,902
Thanked 2,560 Times in 1,586 Posts
|
For what it's worth, the G1 Insight aliment specs, which I'm sure are no-compromise economy specs, are zero camber, zero toe in the front, and very slight toe in at the rear.
Last edited by Ecky; 09-30-2022 at 07:44 PM..
|
|
|
09-30-2022, 06:58 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,509
Thanks: 8,063
Thanked 8,866 Times in 7,318 Posts
|
Quote:
...and very slight toe in at the rear.
|
It sounds like that's the way.
Farm tractors have massive positive front camber. I guess it makes for straighter furrows?
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
09-30-2022, 09:13 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SC Lowcountry
Posts: 1,796
Thanks: 226
Thanked 1,353 Times in 711 Posts
|
.
0-0-0
>
.
__________________
Woke means you're a loser....everything woke turns to ****.
Donald J Trump 8/21/21
Disclaimer...
I’m not a climatologist, aerodynamicist, virologist, physicist, astrodynamicist or marine biologist..
But...
I play one on the internet.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to redneck For This Useful Post:
|
|
|