A feminist comes to terms with the Men's Rights movement

[freebeard]

I could say that a study shows that elimination of prisioners criminals would increase security and intelligence among society. So if they ask me :"Are you telling to kill all criminal population of the country?" I will respond : "I didn't said that. You didn't saw me saying that. I just said studies showed that without criminals society would be safer and smarter."

So what you're saying is....

That's Lobster Logic. Don't project his critics onto Uncle Jordan.

He says if the military won't accept them, then there really isn't a job in the free market that is suitable for the bottom 10%, and that we'll need to figure out something for them to do and a way to provide a reasonable living for them, which is what should be the expertise of the left.

Yikes! Antifa finds work for idle hands.

[redpoint5]

Yeah, I very precisely said "should" rather than "is".

Generally, having an interest in something makes you expert, but emotion alone isn't enough to do good.

The moderate left probably is better at conceiving of plans to care for the disenfranchised compared to the right or extreme left.

I'd say groups like Antifa are the extreme left response to the extreme right (chicken and egg problem?). The extreme right might say eff 'em, and naturally the extreme left would respond with eff you.

That fits nicely with my thought that we'd all be better off without the ends (and I'm not implying killing people).

[freebeard]

Finger puppets on the same hand.

Where do you find the moderate Left? I suggest Jimmy Dore. He's anti-Trump but moreso anti-Rachel Maddow. He used to work with her and has no patience with her beating that poor, dead horse for two years.

(I'm waiting for when that bloated carcass explodes)

[All Darc]

Uncle Jordan and his suggestiosn, to denny latter. Ohn come on...

-He just made elougies to orthodox religion, not a single critc to the prejudice and brainwashing on it. And he suggested to perhaps oppress atheist like Richard Dawkins.
-Gave a idea about support inforced monogammy ("sexual socialism"), just to praise his male public segment who complain about women don't be interested on them.
-Gave idea about split man and women in worksplace, and suggested that make-up was responbsible for sexual harassment, like if man was a animal without controll. It remambers islamic thoughts...

Ok, but you will all tell me he actually didn't said anything oh this, thta it was just a mention.
Jordan Peterson can have some clever moments I do agree, but his huge partial to right wing make me conclude he is a bright puppet of one political side, or just cashing on the thematic.

Buy the way, have you watched the video link I posted ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uc6Q...ature=youtu.be

Or if it's something or thematic not yet commented by Uncle Jordan it don't worth watch ?

[redpoint5]

I do see the left eating their own. I don't follow politics, so I can't point to a moderate left person of prominence. That said, I can't really point to a conservative either, perhaps with exception to Ron Paul.

Politicians make their living by proclaiming they have the solution to everyone's problems, but especially their constituents. "Expand my authority and I'll fix everything for you". You don't ever see a politician saying we're responsible for ourselves and capable of solving our own problems.

[All Darc]

Are INCELs fans of uncle Jordan?
Not different than fat uggly feminists who complain about nobody desire them or no magazine cover want pople like them. At least uggly feminists sh...theads didn't killed people with car (as a tool like terrorists did) yet. The same principle of criminals : If they feel put by side, rejected, without things they wish that other have in higher quantities, they will try to destroy or take by fore or make terrorist acts.
But they are male, and uncle Jordan idea of inforced monogamy maybe attract them.

Here Paul Rubbin in defense of Jordan, trying to explain Jordan din't mean this o rdidn't mean that, or that Jordan should be interviewed again... More escuses.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gm4miiUY_PM

Actual society... with lot of uggly people, who don't want uggly people like thenselves, complaining that are turned down by atractive people.
Childish minds...

[redpoint5]

I don't know who INCELs are. I think I recall something like 20% of males were responsible for 80% of the reproduction. It's probably not that skewed now, but it will always be skewed because women are choosy.

Perhaps envy is biologic? My wife has a friend who is less happy when others are happy. Me on the other hand; it makes me happy to see others happy and doing well... and my wife seems to sometimes exhibit the behavior of being more happy the less happy I am, but it's not that exactly; more like she's happier the more I sacrifice for her. Women are more neurotic though, so that's normal.

[All Darc]

The hypergamia it's not about reproduction in these percentages, otherwise most married man would not be the fathers of the suppoused children they raise. These 80% of hypergamia theory are about intercourse, like 20% of males had 80% of females.

It's a absurd try to inforce laws on it (like uncle Jordan suggested), since it's people choices, despite we approove as right, correct moral or imoral, no matter. It would be like try to put laws to tell you who do you invite to a birthday party.
But we can bet that if it was the reverse, like if 20% of women had 80% of man, there would be a lot of feminists and left wings saying it was a privilege, and would try to create laws over it . I can say they would do much nonsense based in what they aleready do, including in the new canibal fashions like what they can now "thin privilege", accusing other women of be privileged by not being fat.[/B]

Can you imagine diabetic people accusing non diabetic of glycemic privilegy?
Or people without a ...hole (cancer victim who had the colon removed and sh...t in a bag connceted to their intestines) accusing people of colon privilege or toilet privilege?

Yes, envy may be a neural aspect, not just psychologic, even connected to some genetic aspect. Envy people steals more, compete more in nature, but in society/civilization usually creates problems, unless their envy it's used in competition for production/research/achievements.
I know people that only feels confortable with people monetary equal or worse than thenselves. People who get upset somehow if even their sons get bettrer in monetary terms. It may be a similar thing to controll freaks who feels safer if they control other people's life just to feel his own life are less miserable.
Maybe your wife feels that if you are happy it would means that you don't need her and it would increase chances of you find other woman. But it contradicts some things, like if we think that a unhappy man would try to chase happyness with other women.

What a hell... humans are a mess...

Your quote : "my wife seems to sometimes exhibit the behavior of being more happy the less happy I am"
Sounds like you take it from some comedy show, standup comedy show, Seinfeld... Funny...

Originally Posted by redpoint5

I don't know who INCELs are. I think I recall something like 20% of males were responsible for 80% of the reproduction. It's probably not that skewed now, but it will always be skewed because women are choosy.

Perhaps envy is biologic? My wife has a friend who is less happy when others are happy. Me on the other hand; it makes me happy to see others happy and doing well... and my wife seems to sometimes exhibit the behavior of being more happy the less happy I am, but it's not that exactly; more like she's happier the more I sacrifice for her. Women are more neurotic though, so that's normal.

[redpoint5]

For context, I'd be most happy watching some science show, a documentary, or a movie with real conflict and character development... my wife would be happier if I'd watch The Great British Baking Show, or Parks and Rec... sacrificing what I want to make her happy.

To be honest, she dislikes my shows more than I dislike hers. Parks and Rec can be funny, and I do identify with Ron to a scary degree.

[freebeard]

Maybe you can compromise on the Red Green Show?

Bad news, All Darc. Fifteen minutes into the four hour Alex Jones/Joe Rogan interview, they talk about half the population of Brazil being infected with a mind-contol fungus Toxoplasma Gondii, especially the futbol players and motorcycle victims.

Transcription isn't available but go to the 15:00 mark in Alex Jones returns to joe rogan on Youtube.