09-17-2014, 05:12 PM
|
#41 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,653
Thanks: 301
Thanked 1,178 Times in 807 Posts
|
Yeah I had a brand new tarp. When I was lucky enough to get my elk I drove all the way home for the trailer (and helping hands) and then back out for the elk. I thought about bringing the trailer and then leaving at the base of the mountain off the highway but am afraid it would wander off. Still I get by without a pickup but if this new f150 pulls down 29-30 (27-28 4x4) on the highway in 5 years I'll probably buy a used one.
|
|
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
09-17-2014, 05:58 PM
|
#42 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
|
My next vehicle will probably be a truck. Not because I need one but because I love the interior of the ram laramie. Hopefully I can get one with the smaller diesel engine.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
10-03-2015, 01:35 AM
|
#43 (permalink)
|
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
|
Do we know for sure if these ever got 27mpg in the real world?
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
10-03-2015, 02:31 PM
|
#44 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,653
Thanks: 301
Thanked 1,178 Times in 807 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
Do we know for sure if these ever got 27mpg in the real world?
|
If you look on fuelly, you see the overall average for 2015 with the 2.7 is 17.86 mpg (180,000 miles tracked). The overall 2015 average (all motors) is 17.1 mpg which is up from the overall 2014 average of 15.9 mpg.
This guy probably has the best potential (2wd, 3.31 axle) and he has averaged 20 mpg with 60% highway miles.
Rootbeer (Ford F-150) | Fuelly |
|
|
|
|
10-03-2015, 11:38 PM
|
#45 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Urbana, IL
Posts: 1,937
Thanks: 199
Thanked 1,802 Times in 939 Posts
|
They never got the 27mpg rating; the best 2015 F-150 gets 26 highway/22 combined.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Vman455 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-05-2015, 07:03 PM
|
#46 (permalink)
|
|
Experienced UAW Mechanic
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Bear Lake
Posts: 363
Thanks: 7
Thanked 73 Times in 63 Posts
|
I had a then-new '94 Chevy C1500 W/T 4.3 / auto with the optional 3.73:1 rear that averaged 26 more than once. With the optional 3.42:1 gears it should have been capable of 29, though I doubt the standard 3.08:1 rear could have managed 29, would've been too close to lugging. Turbo that to 14.7 psi in the intake manifold, it would be 330 HP and 470 TQ.
These newer trucks have too much unnecessary frontal area for the sake of looking macho. Likewise with them riding too high.
|
|
|
|
|
10-05-2015, 08:00 PM
|
#47 (permalink)
|
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmick
I had a then-new '94 Chevy C1500 W/T 4.3 / auto with the optional 3.73:1 rear that averaged 26 more than once. With the optional 3.42:1 gears it should have been capable of 29, though I doubt the standard 3.08:1 rear could have managed 29, would've been too close to lugging. Turbo that to 14.7 psi in the intake manifold, it would be 330 HP and 470 TQ.
These newer trucks have too much unnecessary frontal area for the sake of looking macho. Likewise with them riding too high.
|
Same here. Not a fan of this new rash of factory lifted over compensating trucks.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
10-07-2015, 01:15 PM
|
#48 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ksa8907
My next vehicle will probably be a truck. Not because I need one but because I love the interior of the ram laramie. Hopefully I can get one with the smaller diesel engine.
|
Several Airstream trailer owners are reporting 32-34/mpg when solo at 55-mph with the Ecodiesel.
|
|
|
|
|
10-07-2015, 04:39 PM
|
#49 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,653
Thanks: 301
Thanked 1,178 Times in 807 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowmover
Several Airstream trailer owners are reporting 32-34/mpg when solo at 55-mph with the Ecodiesel.
|
The problem with that it is common for other forums to just report an instant readout. Is anyone getting that over a whole tank? If so maybe I will look at one for my next vehicle. Then maybe get the rare hi-lo 5th wheel that is for sale here. |
|
|
|
|
10-07-2015, 05:55 PM
|
#50 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,895
Thanks: 23,972
Thanked 7,223 Times in 4,650 Posts
|
'88 Toy
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf
Wouldn't hardly call this progress, since my '88 Toyota 4WD averages 28 :-)
|
You'd probably want to increase the Toyota's weight and frontal area up to that of the F-150 'n see where your 28-mpg went to.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
|
|
