Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-28-2018, 01:41 PM   #41 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic View Post
I wonder how steel and aluminum tariffs and the threat of them may have changed the long range calculus.
This seems very likely to be another motivation.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-28-2018, 02:36 PM   #42 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Utah
Posts: 118
Thanks: 1
Thanked 33 Times in 24 Posts
If Mazda and Volvo continue to sell cars in the US market then Ford is still selling cars in the US market.

If the US market shifts due to regulatory changes, fuel price changes, or whatever, Ford can fairly quickly make adjustments in manufacturing, as long as they are still designing and manufacturing cars for the global market.

US safety laws (which I have little argument with) turned the Fiesta into a relative gas hog. As far as fuel efficiency, it makes little sense to sell anything smaller than the Focus in the US. Anything smaller has to carry more metal for its size, or expensive alloys, to meet safety standards.

Fuel prices here will have doubled from last year, sometime this week. I anticipate that price to at least double yet again before the end of Summer. That will turn consumers to fuel efficient cars again. I think that Ford is limber enough to adjust quickly to market demands without extensive losses (with the possibility of substantial gain).
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2018, 09:53 PM   #43 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
What if they start building and selling electric Lincolns to still meet CAFE reqs?
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2018, 01:17 PM   #44 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
You've just got to shake your head, looking at all the companies that can make profits selling smaller cars while hearing folks from Detroit denying that it's possible to do.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2018, 04:29 PM   #45 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 982
Thanks: 271
Thanked 385 Times in 259 Posts
You just hit on one of the fulcrum points.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ksa8907 View Post
What if they start building and selling electric Lincolns to still meet CAFE reqs?
Small cars don't make money. For roughly the same input of effort, larger vehicles make bunches more money. Electrifying and hybridizing a vehicle costs money. If you can barely make money on a vehicle to begin with you cannot absorb the costs of electrification and hybridization. Electrify and hybridize larger, less fuel efficient vehicles. They need the help the most. They also have the profit ceilings to absorb the associated costs and still make a handsome profit.

The Toyota Prius was done as advertising. It lost gobs of money for its first years of production. Toyota should have hybridized it's pickup line.

Ford has planned to move forward with electrification and hybridization just like other manufacturers. The ability to extend the internal combustion engine 's efficiency moves forward as well as aerodynamics and weight savings. Plop down electrified crossovers with MPGe ratings well above current fuel economies and you can make EPA mandates.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RustyLugNut For This Useful Post:
redpoint5 (04-29-2018)
Old 04-29-2018, 05:57 PM   #46 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,698
Thanks: 7,776
Thanked 8,585 Times in 7,069 Posts
My Arcimoto FUV reservation number comes up in the 2nd or 3rd quarter. It could be one of two series — my " early reservation and proximity" qualify me for "consideration in [our] pilot program". that means a vehicle in Q3 2018. If I elect to wait for a retail production vehicle, they estimate a Q4 2018 delivery.

/humblebrag
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2018, 08:30 PM   #47 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,467

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,213
Thanked 4,391 Times in 3,365 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyLugNut View Post
Electrify and hybridize larger, less fuel efficient vehicles. They need the help the most. They also have the profit ceilings to absorb the associated costs and still make a handsome profit... Toyota should have hybridized it's pickup line.
I've been saying this since forever. Where are all the large hybrids? They are the ones able to recapture the added expense of hybridization faster since they save larger quantities of fuel.

Let's say a (relatively) small car like the Prius is 20% more efficient due to the hybrid system. Maybe without the hybrid drive-train, it would get 40 MPG, but since it has it, it gets 48 MPG. Over the course of 12,000 miles in the year, the hybrid system would save 50 gallons of gasoline.

Now take a Ford F150 that gets 20 MPG, but can get 24 MPG with a hybrid system (20% better). It saves 100 gallons of gasoline driving those same 12,000 miles compared to the Prius.

Obviously it's more efficient to drive the Prius, but if someone insists on driving a larger vehicle, it makes more sense for these larger vehicles to be hybrids. Not only is there much room for improving fuel economy, but there is much room to improve performance. A relatively small 4-cylinder engine might be big enough to accelerate with a load when assisted by powerful electric motors.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2018, 10:31 PM   #48 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 29.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,225
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
I think guys in short pants and weird socks are more likely to drive hybrids than truck guys.

Someone please remind me if we have hybrid semis yet.

Also, I think people who get 50 MPG are infinitely more likely to say "I get 50 MPG! Road trip!"
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2018, 10:42 PM   #49 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by acparker View Post
If Mazda and Volvo continue to sell cars in the US market then Ford is still selling cars in the US market.
Don't forget Jaguar...

Maybe a decade ago, but Ford no longer has any stake in either Mazda, Volvo or Jaguar.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2018, 10:51 PM   #50 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist View Post
Also, I think people who get 50 MPG are infinitely more likely to say "I get 50 MPG! Road trip!"
Out on the roads it looks to me like the opposite: "My V8 4x4 gets 7 mpg! Let's drive it all over creation 24/7!"

__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
ksa8907 (04-30-2018), spacemanspif (04-30-2018)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com