06-09-2021, 08:56 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Thalmaturge
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The edge of nowhere
Posts: 1,167
Thanks: 769
Thanked 646 Times in 431 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH
No, they won't make a single cab long bed. Regular cabs are down to 3% market share.
|
Yeah, I know it'll never happen. But since Ford actually managed to release a smaller pickup, I figured I'd wish for the moon.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
06-09-2021, 03:23 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
AKA - Jason
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,605
Thanks: 327
Thanked 2,152 Times in 1,456 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev
They just need an open bed for their bull****, otherwise a station wagon or van would suit their needs better.
|
You know the needs of every regular cab pickup owner?
I have a van and it works well for what I use it for - camping. I also have a station wagon. If I was buying a vehicle today I would most definitely pick the Maverick over my current sportwagen TDI. I want a cargo area I can hose out and the Maverick's 8 inches of ground clearance is just about perfect.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to JSH For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-11-2021, 11:56 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,117
Thanks: 2,914
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,607 Posts
|
On paper this vehicle is great. Small engine? Check. Good fuel economy? Check. Lots of utility? Check. Oh and other things people care about, such as ground clearance, back seats, and a big touchscreen they can play with while driving.
If I had to recommend a new vehicle, this would be on my radar, along with some Korean offerings. My only hesitation is it being a Ford product - which doesn't necessarily make it bad (re: Fusion) - but my father-in-law just retired from Ford from a senior engineering position and, after turning in his Ford vehicles, promptly bought something non-Ford. According to him, the "150,000 mile end of life design" is alive and well at Ford, at least for their non-trucks.
What would I effectively gain by switching from my Insight to this truck?
-$20,000 less in my pocket
-Reduced fuel economy
-Reduced handling/acceleration/fun to drive (presumably)
+I could tow some things I don't
+If I had someone to put in the backseats, I'd have that
+3 inches more ground clearance (hasn't been an issue)
~
As cynical as I am, I'm glad to see this.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-11-2021, 12:13 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,248
Thanks: 7,258
Thanked 2,235 Times in 1,725 Posts
|
When I washed my girlfriend's Rav4 it was dirty, but when I washed my Accord tons of dirt washed out of the wheels.
So, she has increased clearance and AWD. I drove off-road.
__________________
"Oh if you use math, reason, and logic you will be hated."--OilPan4
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Xist For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-12-2021, 03:44 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Eco-ventor
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,646
Thanks: 77
Thanked 710 Times in 451 Posts
|
Quote:
You know the needs of every regular cab pickup owner?
|
I was talking about "family cab" buyers.
__________________
2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
|
|
|
06-12-2021, 04:17 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,248
Thanks: 7,258
Thanked 2,235 Times in 1,725 Posts
|
What are these "Needs" you speak of?
__________________
"Oh if you use math, reason, and logic you will be hated."--OilPan4
|
|
|
06-12-2021, 11:25 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
"A 40 MPG pickup"
Ford's marketing people must be laughing at the sheer number of media/blog reports touting their new "40 MPG pickup".
Of course we all saw & understand that's the city rating, where most hybrids excel.
Joe & Jane Consumer won't make that distinction. I think they're going to sell like hotcakes. And then we can shake our heads at all the owners complaining that they can "never get anywhere near 40 MPG".
Any guesses on the highway number?
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-12-2021, 12:14 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,906
Thanks: 4,352
Thanked 4,502 Times in 3,463 Posts
|
Probably observation bias, but it seems it's always pickups that are doing 85 MPH on the freeway with the econoboxes doing the speed limit in the right lane.
|
|
|
06-12-2021, 01:50 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,117
Thanks: 2,914
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,607 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
Ford's marketing people must be laughing at the sheer number of media/blog reports touting their new "40 MPG pickup".
Of course we all saw & understand that's the city rating, where most hybrids excel.
Joe & Jane Consumer won't make that distinction. I think they're going to sell like hotcakes. And then we can shake our heads at all the owners complaining that they can "never get anywhere near 40 MPG".
Any guesses on the highway number?
|
I'd wager the highway rating isn't much lower. 37 perhaps?
|
|
|
06-12-2021, 02:00 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,906
Thanks: 4,352
Thanked 4,502 Times in 3,463 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecky
I'd wager the highway rating isn't much lower. 37 perhaps?
|
33
40/33/37
Pretty dang good considering 30 MPG is about the best a 90's Camry does.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|