06-12-2021, 01:06 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
home of the odd vehicles
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,882
Thanks: 500
Thanked 865 Times in 652 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
Ford's marketing people must be laughing
Any guesses on the highway number?
|
33mpg per official release
https://www.autoblog.com/2021/06/08/...hybrid-pickup/
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
33
40/33/37
Pretty dang good considering 30 MPG is about the best a 90's Camry does.
|
I rather have a new 50mpg 5mt Rabbit Diesel Pickup , was hoping the Maverick would be a modern version of it.
Last edited by rmay635703; 06-12-2021 at 10:36 PM..
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rmay635703 For This Useful Post:
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
06-12-2021, 08:33 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by samwichse
What a time to be alive when a 3/4 ton truck is considered a "puny payload"
|
Many commercial operators resort to trucks which are smaller and simpler than a Maverick in 3rd-world countries. Needless to say the Fiat Strada has been one of the best-sellers in Brazil.
https://engineeringworkarounds.blogs...a-and-why.html
Quote:
|
I wonder if they'll make a single cab, long bed version. That's what I need.
|
I guess Ford would rather try to push commercial operators into the Ranger with the extended cab there. |
|
|
|
|
07-05-2021, 07:51 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
|
home of the odd vehicles
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,882
Thanks: 500
Thanked 865 Times in 652 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr
Many commercial operators resort to trucks which are smaller and simpler than a Maverick in 3rd-world
I guess Ford would rather try to push commercial operators into the Ranger with the extended cab there.
|
https://www.long-mcarthur.com/maveri...icalspecs.html
Per the spec sheet the non-hybrid Maverick weighs about the same amount as my old full size half ton and can’t hold or tow as much
Boo, classic small Ford lead weight itis |
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to rmay635703 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
07-06-2021, 12:20 AM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmay635703
Per the spec sheet the non-hybrid Maverick weighs about the same amount as my old full size half ton and can’t hold or tow as much
|
It doesn't really surprise me, even though an old half-ton is not featherweight at all. |
|
|
|
|
12-29-2021, 11:16 AM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,960 Times in 3,604 Posts
|
Maverick eco-drivers: "600 mile club"
I was happy to discover today that some early Maverick hybrid owners are geeking out about the vehicle's fuel economy potential.
One forum has a thread dedicated to getting 600 miles to a tank, equating to about 45 MPG US = 5.2 L/100 km
https://www.mavericktruckclub.com/fo...ick-club.7080/ |
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
|
Ecky (01-03-2022), JSH (12-29-2021) |
|
12-29-2021, 06:24 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186
Thanks: 7,225
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
|
My brother's SLP bragged that she can drive 650 miles in her truck, but the pump automatically clicks off at $128.
Mom said she can do the same in her car.
The EPA says that she can go 536.5 miles.
__________________
"Oh if you use math, reason, and logic you will be hated."--OilPan4
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Xist For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
12-29-2021, 06:35 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,960 Times in 3,604 Posts
|
There was a similar comment in that forum thread: someone said their F150 was just as capable of doing 600 miles. Ergo, buy an F150 instead of the wussy "truck".
|
|
|
|
|
12-29-2021, 06:40 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,456
Thanks: 4,211
Thanked 4,390 Times in 3,364 Posts
|
The Airbus A350 can go 11,000 miles on 37,248 gallons of fuel. A fill up is about $178,000
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
12-30-2021, 09:19 AM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
|
Somewhat crazed
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,061
Thanks: 467
Thanked 1,112 Times in 981 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
The Airbus A350 can go 11,000 miles on 37,248 gallons of fuel. A fill up is about $178,000
|
Empty/@minimums or is ithat the efficiency at gross? Big difference.
Is that the also included mandatory 45 minutes to the alternate airport?
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
|
|
|
|
|
12-30-2021, 05:49 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,653
Thanks: 301
Thanked 1,177 Times in 807 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
The Airbus A350 can go 11,000 miles on 37,248 gallons of fuel. A fill up is about $178,000
|
I think the Nimitz went 1/2 million miles on it's first tank but it cost 1.5 billion to refuel. Then again it hauls 6000 "passengers". I'd be interested to know how many miles the USS Constitution has traveled on never a drop of feul. Or what is the record for a sailing vessel lifetime miles traveled although all modern boats have an ICE motor in addition to the sails.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hersbird For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
