Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > The Unicorn Corral
Register Now
 Register Now
 


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-28-2016, 09:42 PM   #161 (permalink)
Thalmaturge
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The edge of nowhere
Posts: 1,165

Spicy Italian - '13 Fiat 500 Abarth

eBike - '94 Trek Mountain Track 820

CHONK - '18 Honda Clarity
Thanks: 766
Thanked 643 Times in 429 Posts
Same totally real lab that "independently" tested a magical fuel vaporizer AND a magical fuel catalyst and found they are totally legit and real.

  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to samwichse For This Useful Post:
Air-Hybrid (03-24-2017), mcrews (11-29-2016)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-28-2016, 10:14 PM   #162 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
The thing with hho is if it were going to work I would expect it to have the most effect on gas engines and the least effect on diesel engines.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2017, 05:34 PM   #163 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 113
Thanks: 16
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Came across this and wanted to share:
"Typically [on-the-road diesel efficiency gains] are in the 2% to 8% range with clean engines burning quality fuel, however I have seen some tests regularly achieve over 10% and up to 20% with older vehicles" - HHO Injection Diesels by Mark Dansie

"Mark Dansie is a well-known Free Energy skeptic who makes dozens of flights each year to go around the world and check out various technologies."

In other words, Mark sounds like a decent guy and not one who'd want to support HHO and I can't help liking the way he comes over in interviews I've seen.

So, what's really going on?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2017, 05:47 PM   #164 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,999

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 53.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,714
Thanked 2,247 Times in 1,455 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Air-Hybrid View Post
Came across this and wanted to share:
"Typically [on-the-road diesel efficiency gains] are in the 2% to 8% range with clean engines burning quality fuel, however I have seen some tests regularly achieve over 10% and up to 20% with older vehicles" - HHO Injection Diesels by Mark Dansie

"Mark Dansie is a well-known Free Energy skeptic who makes dozens of flights each year to go around the world and check out various technologies."

In other words, Mark sounds like a decent guy and not one who'd want to support HHO and I can't help liking the way he comes over in interviews I've seen.

So, what's really going on?
???
He is going round the world promoting this stuff.
What leads you to think that he is sceptical? He may well be so deep into snake oil that he needs to swim up regularly to breathe.
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gmeter or 0.13 Mmile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2017, 06:04 PM   #165 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London, UK
Posts: 113
Thanks: 16
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
No, he spends his time debunking nonsense like Free Energy devices. He's not in the promoting game. ... So I can't see why he'd put his reputation at risk by saying HHO is (just about) improving things unless he has seen the data.

It seems possible to me that, on diesels especially, hydrogen (even in HHO form) can clean up emissions but not that it can improve mileage.

And I suppose I want to know why I'm wrong there.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2017, 06:45 PM   #166 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,999

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 53.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,714
Thanked 2,247 Times in 1,455 Posts
Have to say the article is really well written.
And actually I do think Browns gas can aid combustion in diesel engines under some conditions. Just not all conditions.

We know plain water vapour can have a benificial effect - under some conditions. I would expect Browns gas to do well under those conditions too, maybe even under a wider range of conditions.
But there's no magic to that.

If you have to factor in the energy needed to provide the gas there may be too little left to make it worthwhile.
Water vapour at least is easy to generate.
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gmeter or 0.13 Mmile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2017, 06:51 PM   #167 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,668

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touraeg
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,187 Times in 813 Posts
The biggest thing that stands out on that diesel rundown is the admission it increases NOx. VW got the same results with tuning, better power, better efficiency, but at the expense of NOx on their diesel engines. So it looks to me like the HHO is just fooling the tune.

I still put out I would love to see what manufactures could do if they didn't have rules.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2017, 01:30 AM   #168 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
Look to the aftermarket to see what modern diesels can do with out government mandated junk.
I have to say if it wasn't for government mandated emissions we may still be using mechanical injection P-pumps and rotory pumps. No fancy CP3 or funky ford hydraulic driven injection systems like on the 6.Oh no and 7.3 power stroke.

Diesel emissions are improved with regular water injection. No need for fancy do nothing hho garbage.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2017, 06:38 PM   #169 (permalink)
JSH
AKA - Jason
 
JSH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,600

Adventure Seeker - '04 Chevy Astro - Campervan
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 2,147 Times in 1,454 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hersbird View Post
The biggest thing that stands out on that diesel rundown is the admission it increases NOx. VW got the same results with tuning, better power, better efficiency, but at the expense of NOx on their diesel engines. So it looks to me like the HHO is just fooling the tune.

I still put out I would love to see what manufactures could do if they didn't have rules.
I work for a truck manufacturer. We would love to increase fuel economy 5% with HHO if it worked AND we could meet required emission requirements. However it doesn't work. As you mentioned to get improved fuel economy you have to use tuning that fails emissions. It is a deadend for ligitimate companies.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JSH For This Useful Post:
elhigh (04-17-2017)
Old 03-26-2017, 06:42 PM   #170 (permalink)
JSH
AKA - Jason
 
JSH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,600

Adventure Seeker - '04 Chevy Astro - Campervan
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 2,147 Times in 1,454 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
Look to the aftermarket to see what modern diesels can do with out government mandated junk.
I have to say if it wasn't for government mandated emissions we may still be using mechanical injection P-pumps and rotory pumps. No fancy CP3 or funky ford hydraulic driven injection systems like on the 6.Oh no and 7.3 power stroke.

Diesel emissions are improved with regular water injection. No need for fancy do nothing hho garbage.
That "government mandated junk" is what keeps our cities from looking like the smog choked hellholes you find in the developing world. It is telling to be in a factory and watch a US spec truck fire up compared to the export trucks without even a particulate filter.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
hho, hho boosters, hydrogen, hydroxy





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com